Conquer Club

dustn64 wrote:no they are gay... jessica could turn any women into a lesbian

Puck yeah
i have her as a background pic on my cell
It's so beautiful, it makes me wanna cry

bumpage

This thread was the best idea i ever had

defenitely

So whos up for more topics like this?

Hitman079 wrote:

LePetitStella wrote:im a chick, whos straight. but im sorry, i would lesbian/bi for her in a second flat!

am i the only one who doesn't want jessica alba?

Nope.

Here comes the second revolutionarist in this thread.

*in borat voice* VERY NICE

Band coming...

UPDATE: seventeen people on CC are homosexual.

dustn64 wrote:UPDATE: seventeen people on CC are homosexual.

or are women

not necessarily

misterman10 wrote:

dustn64 wrote:UPDATE: seventeen people on CC are homosexual.

or are women

Hold The Phones...

LePetitStella wrote:im a chick, whos straight. but im sorry, i would lesbian/bi for her in a second flat!

How about just 17 blind people?

Yes, because if someone doesn't want to 'do more than just hit that' means they're homosexual. Right.

Well, how about if someone considered 'hitting that' to be a disgustingly objectifying approach to thinking about womyn? But hey, you guys have grown up in a misogynist society, so you can't blame yourselves that you haven't begun to think about the repercussions of your words/thoughts/actions towards womyn, right??

For the record, she's nice, nothing to go crazy about though, and I think john said it earlier in the thread, but got flamed for it, but I'd much rather sleep with a girl who has the mental capacity to engage in conversation afterwards (and i have no idea what Jessica Alba is like in that department, obviously never meeting her before)

Sleeping with girls who aren't that intelligent isn't very fulfilling. I've done that (too many times) - over it now.

i'd hit that faster then a heartbeat

I added another banner into my banner thread

radiojake wrote:Yes, because if someone doesn't want to 'do more than just hit that' means they're homosexual. Right.

Well, how about if someone considered 'hitting that' to be a disgustingly objectifying approach to thinking about womyn? But hey, you guys have grown up in a misogynist society, so you can't blame yourselves that you haven't begun to think about the repercussions of your words/thoughts/actions towards womyn, right??

For the record, she's nice, nothing to go crazy about though, and I think john said it earlier in the thread, but got flamed for it, but I'd much rather sleep with a girl who has the mental capacity to engage in conversation afterwards (and i have no idea what Jessica Alba is like in that department, obviously never meeting her before)

Sleeping with girls who aren't that intelligent isn't very fulfilling. I've done that (too many times) - over it now.

calm down dude
we are just joking around
let us, poor men, fantasize a little

-ShadySoul- wrote:

radiojake wrote:Yes, because if someone doesn't want to 'do more than just hit that' means they're homosexual. Right.

Well, how about if someone considered 'hitting that' to be a disgustingly objectifying approach to thinking about womyn? But hey, you guys have grown up in a misogynist society, so you can't blame yourselves that you haven't begun to think about the repercussions of your words/thoughts/actions towards womyn, right??

For the record, she's nice, nothing to go crazy about though, and I think john said it earlier in the thread, but got flamed for it, but I'd much rather sleep with a girl who has the mental capacity to engage in conversation afterwards (and i have no idea what Jessica Alba is like in that department, obviously never meeting her before)

Sleeping with girls who aren't that intelligent isn't very fulfilling. I've done that (too many times) - over it now.

calm down dude
we are just joking around
let us, poor men, fantasize a little

Quite clearly that is always the response when most people have their shit called on 'It was only a joke' - or whatever

Everytime you let a racsist joke slide, you merely just consolidate it, and make it seem acceptable. Same goes for misogyny.

I'm just sick of letting it go, 11 pages of people carrying on over the (probably photoshopped) images of a 'perfect' girl and consolidating the theory that a womyn's only inherit worth is her appearance.

spelling woman like that so that you don't use the word 'man' in it, eh? How stupidly lame is that? I'm a 'womyn' and i talk like that. does that mean i look down on myself? No. Does that mean that i see myself as an object of sexual desire, without a need for a brain? No.

I simply understand the desire for someone that looks so flawless

radiojake wrote:

-ShadySoul- wrote:

radiojake wrote:Yes, because if someone doesn't want to 'do more than just hit that' means they're homosexual. Right.

Well, how about if someone considered 'hitting that' to be a disgustingly objectifying approach to thinking about womyn? But hey, you guys have grown up in a misogynist society, so you can't blame yourselves that you haven't begun to think about the repercussions of your words/thoughts/actions towards womyn, right??

For the record, she's nice, nothing to go crazy about though, and I think john said it earlier in the thread, but got flamed for it, but I'd much rather sleep with a girl who has the mental capacity to engage in conversation afterwards (and i have no idea what Jessica Alba is like in that department, obviously never meeting her before)

Sleeping with girls who aren't that intelligent isn't very fulfilling. I've done that (too many times) - over it now.

calm down dude
we are just joking around
let us, poor men, fantasize a little

Quite clearly that is always the response when most people have their shit called on 'It was only a joke' - or whatever

Everytime you let a racsist joke slide, you merely just consolidate it, and make it seem acceptable. Same goes for misogyny.

I'm just sick of letting it go, 11 pages of people carrying on over the (probably photoshopped) images of a 'perfect' girl and consolidating the theory that a womyn's only inherit worth is her appearance.

what do u want from us? no shit this pic is photoshoped, and we all know that perfectly well. It all depends on how fked up the guy is, if he trully beliefs that a pic of a half naked girl is the "perfect" image for women, then he needs to see a doctor. For many, its not about appearance, but about preference. We all have an image of how our special one should look, behave, and act, and that's what we base our preference one. And it wont kill to fantasize once in a while about something that will never happen. These that truly believe that they can tap jessica alba are just delusional, and only kidding themselves.

s.xkitten wrote:spelling woman like that so that you don't use the word 'man' in it, eh? How stupidly lame is that?

I spell it like that because of my totally token effort to try to remove some of the patriarchal 'normalities' in society. It's really ironic that there is Man and Woman (which inherently implies that a woman is a variation of man) when the fact is it's quite the opposite. XX chromosome and XY chromosome. There is no 'Y' in girls chromosomes, but men indeed have 'X' - Think about it.

Also I do find a great deal of irony trying to explain gender equality to someone called 's.xkitten' - What message are you trying to put across with your screen name?

-ShadySoul- wrote:
what do u want from us? no shit this pic is photoshoped, and we all know that perfectly well. It all depends on how fked up the guy is, if he trully beliefs that a pic of a half naked girl is the "perfect" image for women, then he needs to see a doctor. For many, its not about appearance, but about preference. We all have an image of how our special one should look, behave, and act, and that's what we base our preference one. And it wont kill to fantasize once in a while about something that will never happen. These that truly believe that they can tap jessica alba are just delusional, and only kidding themselves.

It's not about fantasizing or not, that's another issue. I guess I should've made it more clear from the start

The actual Polling question was 'Would you do more than just hit that?' - this question itself is crap. Hit that? Hit what? Since when the f*ck does a word like hit, (which is a violent term, by definition) turn into something that implies sexual gradification? Oh wait, I think I answered my own question maybe, that sexual gradification in this world IS infact a violent act a lot of the time.

But whatever..

radiojake wrote:

s.xkitten wrote:spelling woman like that so that you don't use the word 'man' in it, eh? How stupidly lame is that?

I spell it like that because of my totally token effort to try to remove some of the patriarchal 'normalities' in society. It's really ironic that there is Man and Woman (which inherently implies that a woman is a variation of man) when the fact is it's quite the opposite. XX chromosome and XY chromosome. There is no 'Y' in girls chromosomes, but men indeed have 'X' - Think about it.

Also I do find a great deal of irony trying to explain gender equality to someone called 's.xkitten' - What message are you trying to put across with your screen name?

-ShadySoul- wrote:
what do u want from us? no shit this pic is photoshoped, and we all know that perfectly well. It all depends on how fked up the guy is, if he trully beliefs that a pic of a half naked girl is the "perfect" image for women, then he needs to see a doctor. For many, its not about appearance, but about preference. We all have an image of how our special one should look, behave, and act, and that's what we base our preference one. And it wont kill to fantasize once in a while about something that will never happen. These that truly believe that they can tap jessica alba are just delusional, and only kidding themselves.

It's not about fantasizing or not, that's another issue. I guess I should've made it more clear from the start

The actual Polling question was 'Would you do more than just hit that?' - this question itself is crap. Hit that? Hit what? Since when the f*ck does a word like hit, (which is a violent term, by definition) turn into something that implies sexual gradification? Oh wait, I think I answered my own question maybe, that sexual gradification in this world IS infact a violent act a lot of the time.

But whatever..

you know, i agree with ya, but the term "hit that" came, as anything in sex, in a playful way. At first the term was used to represent gentle slapping ( really), and u would only say that to a girlfriend u had sexual intercourse with. But seeing as anything in this world exaggerates, the term hit that now has a bigger meaning, and i dont believe it implies anything violent.

radiojake wrote:Everytime you let a racsist joke slide, you merely just consolidate it, and make it seem acceptable. Same goes for misogyny.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=kGaDsancYZs

Jesus Radio, get the stick out of your ass. A ton of threads like this went around for a time, it was no big deal. "Womyn" made threads about guys too, so its not a sexist thing.

Also, why did you bring intelligence into your "argument"? All we said was that she's bangin', then you come in and say "I dont know if she is dumb, but I dont want sex with her." A little contradictory...

Chill, its for fun... and viewing pleasure