Conquer Club

qeee1 wrote:My vote goes to anyone who hasn't posted in this thread.

Yeah! Me Too!Hey! wait a minute.

Sorry High Guard I couldn't resist.

qeee1 wrote:My vote goes to anyone who hasn't posted in this thread.

Would you feel better if I changed my vote to you?

Time is running out, just 20 more hours to put in your vote.

VT is gonna win. I know it.

have i won this poll yet?

MR. Nate wrote:Would you feel better if I changed my vote to you?

No thanks, this is the kind of knobendery you expect at a mensa meeting not in the clubhouse. Now lets all ejaculate over ourselves in an orgy of self congratulatory smartness.

qeee1 wrote:Now lets all ejaculate over ourselves in an orgy of self congratulatory smartness.

Not in the eyes for the love of god please queee....

Gotta give honorable mention to some of my noble adversaries: MeDeFe, vtmarik and Guiscard; I've learned a lot debating with them. My list from the other side of most debates includes the usual suspects: Nate, Luns, Anglican. But after reading the agnostic thread, I gotta go with OnlyAmbrose. I was blown away, as were several of his opponents. (No scatalogical puns please, Norse)

daddy1gringo wrote:But after reading the agnostic thread, I gotta go with OnlyAmbrose. I was blown away, as were several of his opponents.

Yeah, pretty good for a kid whose greatest job skill is telling people where the bathroom is located...

(sorry OA, couldn't resist)

To be honest, I couldn't care less who wins. There are plenty of intelligent people on this forums (some of them debate, some don't) and I don't think it's possible to single out just one, and it's almost insulting to the rest if we do.

Vote btown.

Yay for hypocrisy!

I'd have to go with luns, but there isn't really anyway to tell who the smartest really is.

daddy1gringo wrote:Gotta give honorable mention to some of my noble adversaries: MeDeFe, vtmarik and Guiscard; I've learned a lot debating with them. My list from the other side of most debates includes the usual suspects: Nate, Luns, Anglican. But after reading the agnostic thread, I gotta go with OnlyAmbrose. I was blown away, as were several of his opponents. (No scatalogical puns please, Norse)

Sure, but I really get the feeling you are feeding us with excrement here.



Well, not being one to judge the opinions of others, I will turn a blind eye, despite watching certain members of your "hot-list" have their bowel ripped viciously from them, by certain other people.

Not that I wish to be vague.

hecter wrote:To be honest, I couldn't care less who wins. There are plenty of intelligent people on this forums (some of them debate, some don't) and I don't think it's possible to single out just one, and it's almost insulting to the rest if we do.

Vote btown.

Yay for hypocrisy!

Hecter, will you marry me?

Im not even gay, but I would stick one up you to show you how much I care.

qeee1 wrote:

MR. Nate wrote:Would you feel better if I changed my vote to you?

No thanks, this is the kind of knobendery you expect at a mensa meeting not in the clubhouse. Now lets all ejaculate over ourselves in an orgy of self congratulatory smartness.

You don't know how much i like the sound of that.

Norse wrote: watching certain members of your "hot-list" have their bowel ripped viciously from them, by certain other people.

You must mean the vicious uncalled-for personal attacks to which Ambrose responded with surprising gentleness, maturity, and lack of retaliation. Yeah, whoever it was boasted s/he was going to "rip it out of him" or some such bluster and obviously failed. My estimation of Ambrose went up a great deal as a result.

Say Norse, would you have been capable of responding with such restraint?

daddy1gringo wrote:

Norse wrote: watching certain members of your "hot-list" have their bowel ripped viciously from them, by certain other people.

You must mean the vicious uncalled-for personal attacks to which Ambrose responded with surprising gentleness, maturity, and lack of retaliation. Yeah, whoever it was boasted s/he was going to "rip it out of him" or some such bluster and obviously failed. My estimation of Ambrose went up a great deal as a result.

Say Norse, would you have been capable of responding with such restraint?

Nah, I think I'm reffering to the occasions where certain "digs" and mild provocations have be dealt with by supreme blasts of intelligence, wit and cunningness to said one's liver.

I havent seen said one post since, have you?

Maybe he is recovering, and feels a bit sore.

He will come back a better person after he recovers from this defamation of character.

Nobody voted for me so I guess I will!

who really cares about this thread?

misterman10 wrote:who really cares about this thread?

I'm sure high guard does, which is more then I can say for you.

daddy1gringo wrote:You must mean the vicious uncalled-for personal attacks to which Ambrose responded with surprising gentleness, maturity, and lack of retaliation.

Add 'lack of substance' to that list and you've summarised his post beautifully. Please don't make the rookie mistake of thinking that 'not having the last word' is the same thing as 'admitting defeat'. There's only so much sense that can be talked into a man who still continues to insist that forum comedians (and apparently anyone who isn't debating) are 'acting like idiots' and as such cannot be recognised as intelligent enough to warrant even a mention in a discussion about the possible intelligence of forum members.

Anyway, my work here is done, my point has been amply proved, and I really didn't intend to escalate this discussion into a quasi-flame-war and so I'm happy to let the point rest, I think we all know how everybody feels now... but in response to Ambrose's final question:

Yes, spending 10 minutes of my lunch break to assault the posts and character of an individual I've never met is mad good fun. If you ever get bored of debating you should give it a try.

Norse wrote:

daddy1gringo wrote:

Say Norse, would you have been capable of responding with such restraint?

I havent seen said one post since, have you?

1. I'll take that as a "no" to my question.

2. Your friend has some good advice.

Dancing Mustard wrote:Please don't make the rookie mistake of thinking that 'not having the last word' is the same thing as 'admitting defeat'.

Dancing Mustard wrote:

daddy1gringo wrote:You must mean the vicious uncalled-for personal attacks to which Ambrose responded with surprising gentleness, maturity, and lack of retaliation.

Add 'lack of substance' to that list and you've summarised his post beautifully.

Nah, but I will add humility and good humor. Oh wait, those are the things that....

luns101 wrote:

daddy1gringo wrote:But after reading the agnostic thread, I gotta go with OnlyAmbrose. I was blown away, as were several of his opponents.

Yeah, pretty good for a kid whose greatest job skill is telling people where the bathroom is located...

(sorry OA, couldn't resist)

Hey no worries luns, I'm proud of my position! And I just got a 25 cent raise!

So ... um ... posting after the "This thread is closed" sign disqualifies us....right?