More experts say Gov. is lying about 911

FoolishFool · Post by **FoolishFool** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:00 am

Frigidus wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote: Let's say for just a moment that the government did perpetrate 9/11. What exactly do you propose our course of action should be?

Overthrow it
About time, I've been waiting for someone to say this. Would the repercussions of creating a power vacuum by throwing the worlds only superpower into a civil war be much less counteractive than anything that even a corrupt government could ever hope to accomplish? It honestly is a question by the way, no implied answer.

Actually, as an annoying teenager skimming quickly through a conspiracy thread on a simulation risk game site (ahh, we are the future.) I find this one of the very few actually intriguing posts in this whole mindless drivel. I for one can tell that there is no real way you are going to change the mind of either side and you should all move on to this new topic so I can have something to read in the afternoons. And no, I won't tell you my thoughts on this topic, just wanted to move it along. *wanders off to the nearest Atheist vs Cristian thread*

Good day,
The Fool

luns101 · Post by **luns101** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:00 am

xtratabasco wrote:cool, then show us the 757 that this government says hit the pentagon and vaporized.

Please have the $1 million wired to my Swiss bank account.

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:35 am

luns101 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:cool, then show us the 757 that this government says hit the pentagon and vaporized.

Please have the $1 million wired to my Swiss bank account.

yup

your a good man luns, not a great one, but a good one.

and you appear to use the brain that God gave you, which is a rare thing around here.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:41 am

xtratabasco wrote:
luns101 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:cool, then show us the 757 that this government says hit the pentagon and vaporized.

Please have the $1 million wired to my Swiss bank account.

yup

your a good man luns, not a great one, but a good one.

and you appear to use the brain that God gave you, which is a rare thing around here.

Only that's not a 757. Its an F16.

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:46 am

Right here's the plane the government asked me to hide, now where's my mula?

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:26 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:

Right here's the plane the government asked me to hide, now where's my mula?

That's a TWA, the government said it was AA.

I FOUND IT!!!!

I'M rich!

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:25 am

I think dancing mustard had you beat.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:09 pm

in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to scrash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:11 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to crash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.

Thats actually one of the best points I've seen in this tired old charade.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:14 pm

Guiscard wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to crash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.
Thats actually one of the best points I've seen in this tired old charade.

Thank you Guiscard!

Im glad we have found a common ground

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:17 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to scrash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.

Theres many reasons, you can start here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... eptions%22

but your question is besides the point. If a 757 hit the pentagon then the hole shouldnt be smaller than the plane and there should be debris all over the place. we have gone over this in other threads, but the link explains it, if you are truly interested in getting to the bottom of this.

as to the eyewitnesses

Wheres Tim Timmerman when we need him?

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32594

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:20 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to scrash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.
Theres many reasons, you can start here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... eptions%22

but your question is besides the point. If a 757 hit the pentagon then the hole shouldnt be smaller than the plane and there should be debris all over the place. we have gone over this in other threads, but the link explains it, if you are truly interested in getting to the bottom of this.

as to the eyewitnesses

Wheres Tim Timmerman when we need him?

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32594

Answer the question simply and in your own words, Xtra. I'm not watching any bollocks video.

Why, if they could steal two planes to fly into the towers, couldn't they steal another one to fly into the pentagon?

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:28 pm

Guiscard wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to scrash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.
Theres many reasons, you can start here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... eptions%22

but your question is besides the point. If a 757 hit the pentagon then the hole shouldnt be smaller than the plane and there should be debris all over the place. we have gone over this in other threads, but the link explains it, if you are truly interested in getting to the bottom of this.

as to the eyewitnesses

Wheres Tim Timmerman when we need him?

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32594
Answer the question simply and in your own words, Xtra. I'm not watching any bollocks video.

Why, if they could steal two planes to fly into the towers, couldn't they steal another one to fly into the pentagon?

to much to go over, im sorry you dont want to check out the facts.
but if you show us some pictures of the 757 you can be a millionaire.

but since 911 nobody has been able to.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:33 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:in all seriousness though they apparently had no difficulty finding planes to scrash into the Twin towers so I frankly see little importance in proclaiming that there is no photographic evidence of the AA plane that hit the pentagon, although there are plenty of eyewitnesses.
Theres many reasons, you can start here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... eptions%22

but your question is besides the point. If a 757 hit the pentagon then the hole shouldnt be smaller than the plane and there should be debris all over the place. we have gone over this in other threads, but the link explains it, if you are truly interested in getting to the bottom of this.

as to the eyewitnesses

Wheres Tim Timmerman when we need him?

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32594
Answer the question simply and in your own words, Xtra. I'm not watching any bollocks video.

Why, if they could steal two planes to fly into the towers, couldn't they steal another one to fly into the pentagon?

to much to go over, im sorry you dont want to check out the facts.
but if you show us some pictures of the 757 you can be a millionaire.

but since 911 nobody has been able to.

No, you fucking idiot. Answer the question.

Any possible reason whatsoever?!?

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:34 pm

The plane smashed into the pentagon and its wings and tail folded. The physics isnt difficult.

Sorry, but I just dont have time to watch a video that long.

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:35 pm

all let these experts answer your questions.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

cant spoon feed you dude.

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:36 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:The plane smashed into the pentagon and its wings and tail folded. The physics isnt difficult.

Sorry, but I just dont have time to watch a video that long.

to busy flipping burgers for minimum wage instead of being a millionaire.

lol

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:38 pm

xtratabasco wrote:all let these experts answer your questions.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

cant spoon feed you dude.

I'm not gonna read through all that bollocks to try and dredge up an answer that doesn't exist.

Answer the fucking question.

How come they can steal two planes to crash into the WTC, but can't get a plane to crash into the Pentagon?

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:38 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
to much to go over, im sorry you dont want to check out the facts.
but if you show us some pictures of the 757 you can be a millionaire.

but since 911 nobody has been able to.

IF YOU DON'T EXPLAIN THIS SHIT RIGHT NOW IN YOUR OWN WORDS INSTEAD OF SAYING THE SAME STUFF OVER AND OVER UNTILL OUR EYES BLEED I WILL MAKE SURE YOU'RE BANNED TOMORROW!

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:39 pm

they dont answer the question. I dont have time to trawl though the net over pages of text.

Please, spoon feed me.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:40 pm

Lets get a slow clap going...

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:42 pm

Guiscard wrote:Lets get a slow clap going...

xtratabasco · Post by **xtratabasco** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:45 pm

Guiscard wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:all let these experts answer your questions.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

cant spoon feed you dude.
I'm not gonna read through all that bollocks to try and dredge up an answer that doesn't exist.

Answer the fucking question.

How come they can steal two planes to crash into the WTC, but can't get a plane to crash into the Pentagon?

its all in here my friend.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28557

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:45 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:The plane smashed into the pentagon and its wings and tail folded. The physics isnt difficult.

Sorry, but I just dont have time to watch a video that long.

to busy flipping burgers for minimum wage instead of being a millionaire.

lol

pipe down I get paid £20 hour^-1 for my work. Not bad aged 15.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:54 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:all let these experts answer your questions.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

cant spoon feed you dude.
I'm not gonna read through all that bollocks to try and dredge up an answer that doesn't exist.

Answer the fucking question.

How come they can steal two planes to crash into the WTC, but can't get a plane to crash into the Pentagon?

its all in here my friend.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28557

Answer the fucking question in your own words. I don't want a link to a video, or a block of copied text you've found on google.

I want a straight answer in your own words. Understand?

If you're that bothered about 'educating' us 'sheeple' then stop dicking around. Seems like you're not sure of this one yourself, eh?