Conquer Club

your maths sucks

Hm, good point about SA.

Right now, i only have time on the weekends to even go near a computer, so sorry about no updates. Id like to get this through eventually.

sam_levi_11 wrote:your maths sucks

idk who your talking to but...


2+4 = 24 my math is great though!

I like it, looks beautiful, but I don't want this to come in stead of Classic (1.0)

no link from aussie to argentine?

think it should be done!!

bryguy wrote:

sam_levi_11 wrote:your maths sucks

idk who your talking to but...


2+4 = 24 my math is great though!

bryguy when's your birthday? I want to buy you a calculator.

Timon wrote:I like it, looks beautiful, but I don't want this to come in stead of Classic (1.0)

No maps are ever deleted from CC (if that's what you are thinking of). Classic will always be everyone's favorite map. It is also the default create/find a game settings so that newbies play it first.

vampir2124 wrote:no link from aussie to argentine?

think it should be done!!

Its been considered but i like the fact that aussie is still that really easy continent to grab and hold at the beginning from the game for a small bonus. I can lower the bonus to 2, but really the NZ-Argentina doesnt make much sense IMO.

It took nine versions to get to this point? You have a map that is thoroughly lacking in any sense of direction or purpose and should more likely see use on the place mats of your local greasy spoon with a box of broken crayons, then any gaming site.

The continents are myopic, the territories are lackadaisical, and the colors suffer from an iron deficiency. This whole exercise is a slithering feat of malnourishment. And to top it all off, you have post humorously christen it "2.0" as if there were actually some resemblance to the living work of which you take inspiration from and nothing more.

If I were you, I would take this project and put it in a lock box, put the lock box on a shelf, close the closet door, and proceed to torch the entire neighborhood lest no future civilization should exhume this cartographic carcass and pass judgment upon mankind.

mibi wrote:It took nine versions to get to this point? You have a map that is thoroughly lacking in any sense of direction or purpose and should more likely see use on the place mats of your local greasy spoon with a box of broken crayons, then any gaming site.

The continents are myopic, the territories are lackadaisical, and the colors suffer from an iron deficiency. This whole exercise is a slithering feat of malnourishment. And to top it all off, you have post humorously christen it "2.0" as if there were actually some resemblance to the living work of which you take inspiration from and nothing more.

If I were you, I would take this project and put it in a lock box, put the lock box on a shelf, close the closet door, and proceed to torch the entire neighborhood lest no future civilization should exhume this cartographic carcass and pass judgment upon mankind.

Everyone has his critics. You obviously are in the minority. Compared to half the maps on this site that make no sense to me (not being critical) Kaplowitz's idea is a masterpiece. If you don't like a particular map do as everyone else does. Don't play on it.

mibi wrote:It took nine versions to get to this point? You have a map that is thoroughly lacking in any sense of direction or purpose and should more likely see use on the place mats of your local greasy spoon with a box of broken crayons, then any gaming site.

The continents are myopic, the territories are lackadaisical, and the colors suffer from an iron deficiency. This whole exercise is a slithering feat of malnourishment. And to top it all off, you have post humorously christen it "2.0" as if there were actually some resemblance to the living work of which you take inspiration from and nothing more.

If I were you, I would take this project and put it in a lock box, put the lock box on a shelf, close the closet door, and proceed to torch the entire neighborhood lest no future civilization should exhume this cartographic carcass and pass judgment upon mankind.

are you a writer? you should become a critic for sure, love your writing style. =) such venom.

mibi wrote:It took nine versions to get to this point? You have a map that is thoroughly lacking in any sense of direction or purpose and should more likely see use on the place mats of your local greasy spoon with a box of broken crayons, then any gaming site.

The continents are myopic, the territories are lackadaisical, and the colors suffer from an iron deficiency. This whole exercise is a slithering feat of malnourishment. And to top it all off, you have post humorously christen it "2.0" as if there were actually some resemblance to the living work of which you take inspiration from and nothing more.

If I were you, I would take this project and put it in a lock box, put the lock box on a shelf, close the closet door, and proceed to torch the entire neighborhood lest no future civilization should exhume this cartographic carcass and pass judgment upon mankind.

I love your posts mibi!

but seriously, look at the poll. Out of 99 votes, 53 people said they wanted the map.

Kaplowitz wrote:

mibi wrote:It took nine versions to get to this point? You have a map that is thoroughly lacking in any sense of direction or purpose and should more likely see use on the place mats of your local greasy spoon with a box of broken crayons, then any gaming site.

The continents are myopic, the territories are lackadaisical, and the colors suffer from an iron deficiency. This whole exercise is a slithering feat of malnourishment. And to top it all off, you have post humorously christen it "2.0" as if there were actually some resemblance to the living work of which you take inspiration from and nothing more.

If I were you, I would take this project and put it in a lock box, put the lock box on a shelf, close the closet door, and proceed to torch the entire neighborhood lest no future civilization should exhume this cartographic carcass and pass judgment upon mankind.

I love your posts mibi!

but seriously, look at the poll. Out of 99 votes, 53 people said they wanted the map.

Well, it's your 'mandate'.

Say ello to my version 10!



-Changes to Scandinavia, Ukraine can attack Norway
-Removed Sahara Desert
-Changes to US
-New title?

the bonuses for S.A. and Africa don't make sense... maybe they should both be 4.

yes, you're right.

The Scandinavia area looks way too crowded, and the borders there look about as bad as they get on the map. Perhaps simplify or condense that?

And it's Southern U.S., not Souhthern. Also suggest just changing it to Midwest U.S. instead of the squeeze-erific Midwestern U.S.

Can you please reduce the font-size of the territory names? North America looks really crowded and becomes a reason for confusion.

TaCktiX wrote:The Scandinavia area looks way too crowded, and the borders there look about as bad as they get on the map. Perhaps simplify or condense that?

Yeah, I'd definitely make those 3 countries into one. It doesn't make sense to have really big countries like North Africa and Ukraine, but have little territories like that.

I like mibi's style and points...


--Andy

mibi.....that's pure bitch!

AndyDufresne wrote:I like mibi's style and points...


--Andy

So you're saying you agree with him on that i should abandon the map....and then you put a smiley to make me feel better?

btw, what do i need to get a stamp/adv. idea. What requirements?

pepperonibread wrote:

TaCktiX wrote:The Scandinavia area looks way too crowded, and the borders there look about as bad as they get on the map. Perhaps simplify or condense that?

Yeah, I'd definitely make those 3 countries into one. It doesn't make sense to have really big countries like North Africa and Ukraine, but have little territories like that.

Seconded.

ok, ill make Scandinavia one territory, and split up Ukraine.