Moderator: Cartographers
You are right, there is an inner bevel going up, but its not on India, its on the non-playable area. Since India is the main focus of the map, it looks kind of strange.InkL0sed wrote:I don't understand all this about the bevel. It isn't supposed to look like it's sinking -- the direction is up, it's an inner bevel.
Do you mean as it borders the unplayable area? Because that's another few layers that are also bevelled.
I guess I can play around with the stuff.
And the bevel on the names is definitely coming off.

Gradient stroke? I don't have any gradients in this map...Kaplowitz wrote:The gradient stroke around the text makes it hard to read
I dont like the new bevel. I think you should have the playable map and the brown on top one the same level, above the water.
The whole border of India is a little pixely
Thats all for now. Its looking pretty good
Oh. Well, it seems like no matter what I do, I get complaints about the text.Kaplowitz wrote:Not the legend, the text on the map.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Are you territ borders real or have you improvised? If you can, I would move some of them a bit. Right now, there are areas that are confusing - like the green region "eastern" - I have a hard time figuring out where some of the army circles / namers are. Ahh. As I was typing this I noticed that West and Bengal are one territory "West Bengal". With a river passing through it? No way man - that's not going to work. Way too confusing.InkL0sed wrote:![]()

I personally think it adds a little life to the map. Rather than having a rather large blank spot in that areasZeakCytho wrote:Having a legend and a minimap seems redundant, no?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
I'm just wondering if the space could be better filled with something else. Perhaps a quote on India? Or a picture? I suppose it's of minor consequence in the end, but I dislike redundancy.gimil wrote:I personally think it adds a little life to the map. Rather than having a rather large blank spot in that areasZeakCytho wrote:Having a legend and a minimap seems redundant, no?
Lets leave it at personal artistic intrestsZeakCytho wrote:I'm just wondering if the space could be better filled with something else. Perhaps a quote on India? Or a picture? I suppose it's of minor consequence in the end, but I dislike redundancy.gimil wrote:I personally think it adds a little life to the map. Rather than having a rather large blank spot in that areasZeakCytho wrote:Having a legend and a minimap seems redundant, no?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Okaygimil wrote:Lets leave it at personal artistic intrests
Hmm. Semms you havent leart that I get the last workZeakCytho wrote:Okaygimil wrote:Lets leave it at personal artistic intrests
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
I don't think that's a bad idea. Right now the rivers are effecting readability and regions, so if you nuke the rivers entirely for a while and get everything else settled you can drop the rivers in later. ??InkL0sed wrote:West Bengal is definitely a problem. I think I may have to give up and just completely wipe out the river parts that aren't impassables. I hate it, but ah well. The Ganges isn't even on its true course, I had to take some liberty with it....
I like the third option the best; the first two I hate.waseemalim wrote:I object to Bangladesh and Bhutan being part of "Eastern India" -- they are entirely different countries and it is very disrespectful to include them under such classification. Solutions:
1. Dont include those territories
2. Have single bonuses for those counties
3. Rename the continent to something like "Eastern zone"
Also I agree that the map looks a bit plastic.