Moderator: Tournament Directors
Is this the tournament where the last man standing wins?Sir. Ricco wrote:Keiths31 has withdrawn from the tournament. Sorry to see you go.
Tournament Down to 12 players.

It might be. There will be no more replacements, and I am expecting another year at the least left.Lufsen75 wrote:Is this the tournament where the last man standing wins?Sir. Ricco wrote:Keiths31 has withdrawn from the tournament. Sorry to see you go.
Tournament Down to 12 players.
AgreeBones2484 wrote:I vote for three groups of four just to make this go more quickly.

You are such a whiner. Do you even realize that in one of the two games you are referring to I am leading? Or are you just going to sit here crying about the fact that I kept breaking your bonus after you continually attacked me for no reason in a build game? I apologize for growing tired of your attacks so I crippled you.aspalm wrote:I would also like to bring to attention the behavior of Bones in two ongoing games. I've never had a problem with Bones, and I believe he is a quality player, but he has admitted that he has deliberately handed games to players instead of playing them straight to try and influence the current standings in this tournament. I feel this is unacceptable behavior. Each game should be played as if they were not even in a tournament. So what- we're just going to gang up on whoever is at the top of the heap until everyone is at 99 wins? Ridiculous.
This tournament was ambitious, and it is a miracle it is still going considering all the dropouts. To Bones and all others who see themselves losing a game: try and win it. Play it as you would a normal game with nothing on the line but points and your reputation. I won every game I have won legitimately. I don't think I've even won one of those "bonus" games that I detest, because I never get there in time to sign up half the time.
Play it straight, and don't gang up as if it were a terminator game. Otherwise, this tournament will have truly been a waste of all of our time.
Don't listen to the ramblings of the poor loser.poptartpsycho18 wrote:Well, I've got mixed feelings because I really didn't need the game handed to me, I probably would have won it anyway so now if I win it'll seem like I didn't win it on my own, which will cheapen it for me. But I'm not about to throw it so it's a hard pill to swallow for me too.
You're kidding, right? Go back and read your post. You attacked my character from the very first sentence.aspalm wrote:I feel obliged to respond to Bones's responses to my post. In no way did I bash Bones or his character in my post. "Loser"? "Whiner"? Very mature.
See? This is where you completely miss the point (as usual). I only critiqued you for doing that because you decided to call me out for attacking you. Ironic that you attack me all game and then when I decide to fight back, I'm the one playing poorly.aspalm wrote:And, btw, thank you, for the critique of my attacking during a "build" game. I got a good laugh out of that one. The nerve-attacking instead of just sitting there! I guess I missed the memo that said everyone in a no spoils game has to just sit there for 3 months until someone gets bored and suicides. A "build" game. ha!

I vaguely remember something like that.drunkmonkey wrote:Does anyone else remember Sir Ricco mentioning something about searching for unannounced bonus games? Maybe it was just my imagination...