Moderator: Community Team
And Snorri won it.daddy1gringo wrote:It's a redundant discussion. The "manifesto" is extreme conservatism. If you are an extreme conservative, you'll agree w/ all of it; if you are an extreme liberal, you'll disagree with all of it. If you're moderate to any degree, how much of it you agree with depends on where you generally fall on the scale.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
It depends on what your definition of "Save America" is or whether or not America needs saving.daddy1gringo wrote:It's a redundant discussion. The "manifesto" is extreme conservatism. If you are an extreme conservative, you'll agree w/ all of it; if you are an extreme liberal, you'll disagree with all of it. If you're moderate to any degree, how much of it you agree with depends on where you generally fall on the scale.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Its amusing stuff but cant see why it would lead to a ban, we are quite fond of eccentrics in BritainNobunaga wrote:... Bump.
... Is this why Savage was banned from the UK?
...
... A blog post I linked to in the other thread talks about Savage's views on rape being offensive. ... I've never heard him speak on the topic, wondering what those views might be.comic boy wrote:Its amusing stuff but cant see why it would lead to a ban, we are quite fond of eccentrics in BritainNobunaga wrote:... Bump.
... Is this why Savage was banned from the UK?
...
I read the Telegraph article and pretty much entirely agree with it.Nobunaga wrote:... A blog post I linked to in the other thread talks about Savage's views on rape being offensive. ... I've never heard him speak on the topic, wondering what those views might be.comic boy wrote:Its amusing stuff but cant see why it would lead to a ban, we are quite fond of eccentrics in BritainNobunaga wrote:... Bump.
... Is this why Savage was banned from the UK?
...
...
He appears to make 2 comments that probably are the heart of the uproar...Nobunaga wrote:... A blog post I linked to in the other thread talks about Savage's views on rape being offensive. ... I've never heard him speak on the topic, wondering what those views might be.comic boy wrote:Its amusing stuff but cant see why it would lead to a ban, we are quite fond of eccentrics in BritainNobunaga wrote:... Bump.
... Is this why Savage was banned from the UK?
...
...
Read it again.. he's suggested stripping citizens of their citizenship to MAKE them illegal.captain.crazy wrote:I totally agree with this manifesto, especially that parts about repatriating illegals. Go back from whence you came and re-enter this country legally.
Those aren't exactly views on the crime of rape. Those are views on homosexuals. I guess they prefer to have you believe he condones rape than that some actually have negative views of homosexuals. See what he means?got tonkaed wrote:one refers to an idea that more or less the homosexual agenda is mind-raping everyone, especially children. This would probably be quite offensive to homosexuals,their advocates, rape victims and their advocates as well.
The other appears to be a comment about human rights groups. Essentially he says when you think human rights you should think gay, and you should think someone who wants to rape your children and then have you defend them for it. That one is probably quite a bit offensive to a decent number of people.
Google search finds them in 2 pages imo.
i hope you get raped. then maybe you will see what all the fuss is aboutHapSmo19 wrote:Those aren't exactly views on the crime of rape. Those are views on homosexuals. I guess they prefer to have you believe he condones rape than that some actually have negative views of homosexuals. See what he means?got tonkaed wrote:one refers to an idea that more or less the homosexual agenda is mind-raping everyone, especially children. This would probably be quite offensive to homosexuals,their advocates, rape victims and their advocates as well.
The other appears to be a comment about human rights groups. Essentially he says when you think human rights you should think gay, and you should think someone who wants to rape your children and then have you defend them for it. That one is probably quite a bit offensive to a decent number of people.
Google search finds them in 2 pages imo.
Took care of that with a coat hanger.HapSmo19 wrote:Still can't wash away that dirty feeling?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
If i equate two things, by saying that A is akin to B, i necessarily have to divluge information about how i feel toward A and B.HapSmo19 wrote:Those aren't exactly views on the crime of rape. Those are views on homosexuals. I guess they prefer to have you believe he condones rape than that some actually have negative views of homosexuals. See what he means?got tonkaed wrote:one refers to an idea that more or less the homosexual agenda is mind-raping everyone, especially children. This would probably be quite offensive to homosexuals,their advocates, rape victims and their advocates as well.
The other appears to be a comment about human rights groups. Essentially he says when you think human rights you should think gay, and you should think someone who wants to rape your children and then have you defend them for it. That one is probably quite a bit offensive to a decent number of people.
Google search finds them in 2 pages imo.