Moderator: Community Team
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:I don't believe for a second that Woodruff took any threats seriously. He loves drama and an opportunity has presented itself and he's going for broke.
I've voiced my concerns over cyber bullying here before. But not "I'm gonna hunt you down and blah blah blah" crap. The harmful stuff is the psychological torment that can be applied to a person.
I've seen Woodruff act passive-aggressive and he has tried to be hurtful many times. This is just the same thing, but in a bigger way. "What?? Me?!?! I was only concerned for my safety!! I wasn't trying to screw anybody over!!" Bullcrap, Woodruff. You are a vindictive person.
Fortunately, I think the authorities are going to tell him he's a nut.
Well I suppose it is possible that the forums become too much work, or too much risk, but Id guess we are pretty far away from that for now. Not to say the possibility is not there.PLAYER57832 wrote:AAFitz
Good post. I won't quote it all. However, 2 points.
First, I agree that if CC did not let the information get out (if they did not take sufficient security), they are not directly responsible. I won't cite any legal precedents (such as Craig's list) because the jurisdiction differs and this is an area where the law is still in flux, being changed almost continually. (the result of new technology, powers, etc.).
When I talk about forum shutdown or leven just serious curtailment, I mean that this is, as we have been told repeatedly, a gaming site. If the forums get to be too much of a bother, any business would just eliminate them. I am not privy to the data, the reasoning, etc. Right now, the forums are serving a purpose.. either just the desire of admin or, more likely, they are helping to keep this an active site. However, that balance could tip. Lawsuits, continual harrassment of mods, complaints that don't end and general bickering are certainly moving that balance closer to the tipping point.
I suspect that as yet, the "tipping point" is pretty far. However, that could change. That was my only real point.
That is also, (a point I know you realize, but maybe others don't) why I do make suggestions about clarifying rules and policies, even the occasional complaint. I do so because I want the site to stay. Not just the site, but the forums.

I think you meant to say, if CC took reasonable precautions, they are not directly responsible.PLAYER57832 wrote:
First, I agree that if CC did not let the information get out (if they did not take sufficient security), they are not directly responsible.
Many of the complaints against mods that I see have to do with unequal moderating (my complaints all had to do with unequal moderating); no action taken regarding complaints, depending on who complained or who the complaint is against or if the mod who happens to be reviewing the issue just doesn't consider the issue serious enough to require a warning - which leaves ALL early discipline that might be used to curtail incidents, totally up the whim of the mod, and THAT leads to a potential (and sometimes actual) problem of "too much favoritism".Lawsuits, continual harrassment of mods, complaints that don't end and general bickering are certainly moving that balance closer to the tipping point...

In 1904: King Edward VII granted them the prefix 'Royal' and so the force then became known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
Because you foisted it on the peace loving peoples of Canada. Please remove your royal charter forthwith.chaosfactor wrote:In 1904: King Edward VII granted them the prefix 'Royal' and so the force then became known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
Before 1904 they were simply known as the Canadian Mounted Police.
I referred to them as Privates, Sergeants and Lieutenants, because I was drawing a comparison based on the ranking system in this game. If I mentioned constables they would have been confused with the moderators on this site.
If you didn't like us Brits maligning them in the first place, why agree to them being called Royal in the first place?
As soon as you work back every Queen's birthday you've had off. And re-name Regina - and PEI. And give back your medals from the commonwealth games. And start speaking French. Don't you have a toque to be wearing, eh?notyou2 wrote:Because you foisted it on the peace loving peoples of Canada. Please remove your royal charter forthwith.chaosfactor wrote:In 1904: King Edward VII granted them the prefix 'Royal' and so the force then became known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.notyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.
Before 1904 they were simply known as the Canadian Mounted Police.
I referred to them as Privates, Sergeants and Lieutenants, because I was drawing a comparison based on the ranking system in this game. If I mentioned constables they would have been confused with the moderators on this site.
If you didn't like us Brits maligning them in the first place, why agree to them being called Royal in the first place?
We would but your resources get mixed up with all that other stuff coming from India etc, there's just no way we can separate it out now. If you want we can send Liz over for a pep talk again, though. You do have some great comedians, could you send some over?notyou2 wrote:I left my toque on the wood stove to dry last week and it melted. I'll have to knit a new one eh.
OK, I get your point, but please return all the resources you have stripped from this great country for 500 years.
I always thought they had no ballsnotyou2 wrote:Chaos, its ROYAL Canadian Mounted Police, thus the RCMP, and they don't have privates, they have constables.
Please do your research, we don't take kindly to Brits maligning our RCMP, otherwise the rest of the article is fine except for a few spelling errors.
Carry on.


El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:
There is no comparison.

El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
They do though, give great lap dances!jonesthecurl wrote:Yup, the brit bobbies just can't tap-dance to save their life.