Conquer Club

Amazing challenge guys, looks like this one will be going to THOTA, but obviously 2 of the best on CC.. no doubts.

Congrats on the clan challenge of the year guys, u didnt dissapoint!

It was a great challenge, one of the greatest that CC has ever seen.
Both clans played great,
Congrats to THOTA

sk-

Not really sure why my clan is giving up already. This thing could still end 40-40

kratos644 wrote:Not really sure why my clan is giving up already. This thing could still end 40-40

Agreed, we still have a chance in 2 games. WWII is roughly even, so if we can win the other one then we can still pull off a tie.

Now THAT would be something else...

george is right, this still could easily be 40-40, the last 2 games are close to about even in troops last I knew. Much respect to Tsm for being a class act and fighting like true warriors.

Blitzaholic wrote:george is right, this still could easily be 40-40, the last 2 games are close to about even in troops last I knew. Much respect to Tsm for being a class act and fighting like true warriors.

Same to you boys

Soo, is there a tiebreaker planned if it evens up?

Maybe everyone whips it out, measures, and the clan with the highest combined score wins?

Snowgun wrote:Soo, is there a tiebreaker planned if it evens up?

Maybe everyone whips it out, measures, and the clan with the highest combined score wins?

There is nothing planed. I still say 1 quad on a standard map, no spoils, chained, sunny should be the tie breaker if it comes to that. Otherwise we could just leave it a tie. I'm not up for some 40 or 60 game tie breaker if that's what anyone's thinking, just how I feel.

Georgerx7di wrote:

Snowgun wrote:Soo, is there a tiebreaker planned if it evens up?

Maybe everyone whips it out, measures, and the clan with the highest combined score wins?

There is nothing planed. I still say 1 quad on a standard map, no spoils, chained, sunny should be the tie breaker if it comes to that. Otherwise we could just leave it a tie. I'm not up for some 40 or 60 game tie breaker if that's what anyone's thinking, just how I feel.

Like the idea, but I'd make it a 3 game series with those teams and settings for posterity's sake.

For the moment, let's file any talk of a tiebreaker under the heading "let's cross that bridge when and if we get to it." No sense in engaging in vile speculation unless necessary.

well Id be in for another chicago quad Im too funny

reptile wrote:Amazing challenge guys, looks like this one will be going to THOTA, but obviously 2 of the best on CC.. no doubts.

Congrats on the clan challenge of the year guys, u didnt dissapoint!

thx reptile, there is still 3 games ongoing and we slightly ahead 39-38 in total games, but, 2 of the last 3 games are around even in troops, in fact, earlier this am, they were ahead 7+ troops in euro war II.

over 14,000 views, can that be right?

Blitzaholic wrote:over 14,000 views, can that be right?

blitzy u prolly take a look like 100 times a day so u tell me

nikola_milicki wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:over 14,000 views, can that be right?

blitzy u prolly take a look like 100 times a day so u tell me

LOL, I got too many games active to do that.

Incandenza wrote:For the moment, let's file any talk of a tiebreaker under the heading "let's cross that bridge when and if we get to it." No sense in engaging in vile speculation unless necessary.

Wild speculation, perchance?

Vile speculation seems somewhat more sinister.

niMic wrote:

Incandenza wrote:For the moment, let's file any talk of a tiebreaker under the heading "let's cross that bridge when and if we get to it." No sense in engaging in vile speculation unless necessary.

Wild speculation, perchance?

Vile speculation seems somewhat more sinister.

no I think he meant what he said

i was thinking along nimic's lines earlier actually! if it is intentional then it at least goes down as an apt turn of phrase anyway

niMic wrote:

Incandenza wrote:For the moment, let's file any talk of a tiebreaker under the heading "let's cross that bridge when and if we get to it." No sense in engaging in vile speculation unless necessary.

Wild speculation, perchance?

Vile speculation seems somewhat more sinister.

best of 15 on Hive, no cards-adjacent, fog

Blitzaholic wrote:

niMic wrote:

Incandenza wrote:For the moment, let's file any talk of a tiebreaker under the heading "let's cross that bridge when and if we get to it." No sense in engaging in vile speculation unless necessary.

Wild speculation, perchance?

Vile speculation seems somewhat more sinister.

best of 15 on Hive, no cards-adjacent, fog

It might take more than a year to play them lol.

Dako wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

niMic wrote:

Incandenza wrote:For the moment, let's file any talk of a tiebreaker under the heading "let's cross that bridge when and if we get to it." No sense in engaging in vile speculation unless necessary.

Wild speculation, perchance?

Vile speculation seems somewhat more sinister.

best of 15 on Hive, no cards-adjacent, fog

It might take more than a year to play them lol.

I was joking but, could you imagine how long this thread would be by then

its too long already

no harm in making it longer

sweet battle guys!

nikola_milicki wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:over 14,000 views, can that be right?

blitzy u prolly take a look like 100 times a day so u tell me

Actually he's right. I'm sure I've looked at this thread 50 or 100 times over the past few months, so several thousand could be from clan people, still that leaves thousands for others. Btw, this war will be the topic of another article. I had planned it that way because I thought it would be over, but I should have waited one more issue, oh well, writing about this clan wars is what got me interested in the newspaper anyway.