Page 627 of 2036
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:59 am
by hammockboy1
if the mods could change the name on the thread to fairylot why don'y they?
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:59 am
by Aries
Skittles! wrote:hecter wrote:Skittles! wrote:hecter wrote:Skittles! wrote:Aries wrote:In so many things about Spamalot knights, it has practically every name of a knight that's active except me
It's like barely anyone other than a knight knows that I'm a knight
I don't think many of the knights know I'm part of Spamalot.
You're a part of Spamalot!?
Loser..
Come on. It was a joke. Hence the ":lol:".
I know that Hecter, I'm not an idiot.
But you can't say the same about diddle
Have to go guys, cya
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:00 am
by hecter
Later Aries.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:00 am
by Skittles!
Byee
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
by hammockboy1
hecter why does your signature say creator of the fairylot thread
not spamalot
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:02 am
by Skittles!
hecter wrote:Skittles! wrote:I know that Hecter, I'm not an idiot.
REALLY!?
Man… You're full of surprises today
Boy, I know. It's so good, right?
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:05 am
by hecter
hammockboy1 wrote:hecter why does your signature say creator of the fairylot thread
not spamalot
1. I didn't create this thread
2. It says Spam King right above it
3. I did create the Fairylot thread. In callouts.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:39 am
by jnd94
hey guys
I was looking back, remember when their were like 5 knights? All the ppl in spamalot were Vincent, hecter, DDS, Aries, Skittles, and a bunch o ppl that didnt talk?
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:40 am
by XenHu
What are 'ppl'?
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:42 am
by Splash
XenHu wrote:What are 'ppl'?
-X
people
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:49 am
by XenHu
Splash wrote:XenHu wrote:What are 'ppl'?
-X
people
I suppose you missed my sarcasm.
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:49 am
by Skittles!
jnd94 wrote:hey guys
I was looking back, remember when their were like 5 knights? All the ppl in spamalot were Vincent, hecter, DDS, Aries, Skittles, and a bunch o ppl that didnt talk?
Boo yawh, one of the original.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:50 am
by Skittles!
XenHu wrote:Splash wrote:XenHu wrote:What are 'ppl'?
-X
people
I suppose you missed my sarcasm.
-X
I think a lot of people that have multiple personalities would.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:56 am
by XenHu
Skittles! wrote:XenHu wrote:Splash wrote:XenHu wrote:What are 'ppl'?
-X
people
I suppose you missed my sarcasm.
-X
I think a lot of people that have multiple personalities would.
I don't miss sarcasm.
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:57 am
by Skittles!
XenHu wrote:Skittles! wrote:XenHu wrote:Splash wrote:XenHu wrote:What are 'ppl'?
-X
people
I suppose you missed my sarcasm.
-X
I think a lot of people that have multiple personalities would.
I don't miss sarcasm.
-X
I was talking about your type of sarcasm. Not other people's.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:02 am
by hammockboy1
are the mods attacking again?
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:05 am
by XenHu
hammockboy1 wrote:are the mods attacking again?
Firstly, they don't 'attack'. Secondly, do you see any mods here?
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:06 am
by hecter
hammockboy1 wrote:are the mods attacking again?
No, just one of there lackies.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:10 am
by XenHu
hecter wrote:hammockboy1 wrote:are the mods attacking again?
No, just one of there lackies.
'Lackeys'.
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:10 am
by hecter
XenHu wrote:hecter wrote:hammockboy1 wrote:are the mods attacking again?
No, just one of there lackies.
'Lackeys'.
-X
Sorry
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:11 am
by XenHu
hecter wrote:XenHu wrote:hecter wrote:hammockboy1 wrote:are the mods attacking again?
No, just one of there lackies.
'Lackeys'.
-X
Sorry
Apology excepted.
If you are going to falsely name me, at least spell it right.
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:13 am
by hecter
I'm not falsely naming anybody. You're one of the lackeys.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:14 am
by XenHu
hecter wrote:I'm not falsely naming anybody. You're one of the lackeys.
Uh-huh.
For a lark, explain to me why you think that.
-X
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:15 am
by hecter
XenHu wrote:hecter wrote:I'm not falsely naming anybody. You're one of the lackeys.
Uh-huh.
For a lark, explain to me why you think that.
-X
No thank you. I don't have to explain anything to you.
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:16 am
by XenHu
hecter wrote:XenHu wrote:hecter wrote:I'm not falsely naming anybody. You're one of the lackeys.
Uh-huh.
For a lark, explain to me why you think that.
-X
No thank you. I don't have to explain anything to you.
I didn't think you would.
All talk, no action, eh Hecter?
-X