pmchugh wrote:
This is harder to argue with, but I wouldn't be surprised if the SK was given a fake claim to help him out.
A fake claim of the guy who pops up as the pen name for the last 2 lynches(
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 0#p3749137)? Awfully convenient? Would be kinda worthless to throw it out on an sk don't you think?
As I said, I 'fessed up on maybe it wasn't the best decision to kill night 1, but it's a bit hard to eat humble pie when I got a bullseye on mafia, while the best everyone else can come up with is lynching a vt and green survivor, and being desperate enough to want to lynch an inactive on day 3?
safariguy5 wrote:One of the ways to distance a vig from an SKer is precisely not shooting on Night 1 as SKer's must kill. By killing Night 1, you've put yourself in the situation where you exactly could be the SKer Leehar. I suppose it's true that we could have a Poisoner and you'd be off the hook, but the consistency of 2 night kills makes it more difficult to speculate.
I'm not understanding this correlation you have going on? I wasn't around for the end for at least the last fortnight and a bit, and I certainly didn't perform any night action. I didn't even know chuck and sparticus were dead until I looked at page 91 just now, since I was reading off the OP and thats only had 4 kills, which was actually making me think no one died last night.
Anyway, I certainly had nothing to do with chucks death, which lends credence to their being an actual sk out there, who's quite distinct from me. Scene flavour should also lend credence to that, since my guy died with a bullet, and this n2 kill with a knife apparently.
Perhaps his reasoning for not killing n1 was a counter for your reasoning Saf? They didn't want to stand out by killing n1 as sk?
