Moderator: Community Team
Yup. No more skimming for you. Hammer from aage.aage wrote:He did, Mr. Skimmer. The vote count is on the previous page, and Everywhere's not on it.Iron Butterfly wrote:Excuse me but did I miss somthing?
Every was cleared how? Because Clever didnt get hammered/lynched? I did not see a vote count regarding that situation and Hippo removed his vote. What exactly does this prove?
Obviously you don't agree to yourself getting lynched.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:i thought that when he proved it people were gonna unvote now i find im gonna get lynched? i know im a vt and one of the vt was gonna get lynched but whatever. either way its not what i agreed to but who cares?
Personally, I think the Everywhere-testing and not-hammering S7C has dragged on far longer than usual, which makes me think he's got help. Two masons are already claimed, I doubt there are more.
Vote S7C. This should have happened days ago.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
betiko wrote:care to elaborate what you say about us 4? what makes you think that everywhere being priest has more chances of being scum than town? the flavour doesn't fit mafia. For me it's a role related to the oracle, therefore most likely beneficial to town.MoB Deadly wrote:my predictions
clever - town
vode - town
everywhere - scum
strong fos - betiko
we have 4 vts and i want to get rid of one. VT is the number 1 fakeclaim for scum, and clever is definitely for me the scummiest.
fastposted
The lynch is already done MoB....MoB Deadly wrote:betiko wrote:care to elaborate what you say about us 4? what makes you think that everywhere being priest has more chances of being scum than town? the flavour doesn't fit mafia. For me it's a role related to the oracle, therefore most likely beneficial to town.MoB Deadly wrote:my predictions
clever - town
vode - town
everywhere - scum
strong fos - betiko
we have 4 vts and i want to get rid of one. VT is the number 1 fakeclaim for scum, and clever is definitely for me the scummiest.
fastposted![]()
![]()
- Oh my dear god please pretend I never posted this post. I will do I big post today, its long overdue. If safari posts scene/lynch, then I will post everything First thing tomorrow morning, or Lynch me.
Immediate thoughts on Clever. I think he is town. I think vode is the safer lynch (in contrast to my previous post that I said ignore.) Vode has the only character claimed VT that can go into the matrix. If that is not enough for everyone, I completely understand lynching clever, I think the information we get from his lynch is definitely worthwhile to keep us moving forward on the game.

Looked at all of dazzas posts while he was in the game - he never ever made a comment on the meta of the characters. Never agreed or disagreed with the idea that VTs were all zion-born. Just something to note.... I would feel like we could have something if dazza seemed to agree that VTs were all zion.vodean wrote:is it possible that dazza comes in here and claims with me? he wouldnt have to know what i claimed.
I understand and saw that there was a vote count. I would think the logistics would show his name but no vote/hammer. THAT is my point. Was that the proper way it is done or are people assuming he voted and did not hammer?aage wrote:He did, Mr. Skimmer. The vote count is on the previous page, and Everywhere's not on it.Iron Butterfly wrote:Excuse me but did I miss somthing?
Every was cleared how? Because Clever didnt get hammered/lynched? I did not see a vote count regarding that situation and Hippo removed his vote. What exactly does this prove?
Obviously you don't agree to yourself getting lynched.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:i thought that when he proved it people were gonna unvote now i find im gonna get lynched? i know im a vt and one of the vt was gonna get lynched but whatever. either way its not what i agreed to but who cares?
Personally, I think the Everywhere-testing and not-hammering S7C has dragged on far longer than usual, which makes me think he's got help. Two masons are already claimed, I doubt there are more.
Vote S7C. This should have happened days ago.
I'm not sure what you're talking about. If he is at L-1 and I vote him (and I'm not another priest...), then it would automatically be the hammer, right?Iron Butterfly wrote:I understand and saw that there was a vote count. I would think the logistics would show his name but no vote/hammer. THAT is my point. Was that the proper way it is done or are people assuming he voted and did not hammer?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
aage wrote:I'm not sure what you're talking about. If he is at L-1 and I vote him (and I'm not another priest...), then it would automatically be the hammer, right?Iron Butterfly wrote:I understand and saw that there was a vote count. I would think the logistics would show his name but no vote/hammer. THAT is my point. Was that the proper way it is done or are people assuming he voted and did not hammer?
I did notice one mistake on my part, which is that I didn't unvote. Rules dictate that I should, so here she goes... Unvote vote S7C
Again, like I said earlier, your skimming is noted.Iron Butterfly wrote:aage wrote:I'm not sure what you're talking about. If he is at L-1 and I vote him (and I'm not another priest...), then it would automatically be the hammer, right?Iron Butterfly wrote:I understand and saw that there was a vote count. I would think the logistics would show his name but no vote/hammer. THAT is my point. Was that the proper way it is done or are people assuming he voted and did not hammer?
I did notice one mistake on my part, which is that I didn't unvote. Rules dictate that I should, so here she goes... Unvote vote S7C
Maybe Im just dumb. Whats to stop Everywhere to say he voted when he didnt?
Ya know what...whatever.
SCUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY!shieldgenerator7 wrote:UNVOTE
Awwww! I came too late! Anyway, nice case S7C. I'll look more into it tomorrow in D4.
-SG7 ()
yup. and to answer clever; when did I say that I was not on sg7's back anymore? I said that I wanted one more claim and then most probably be in favour of a VT lynch. I didn't manage to gather enough people on my SG7 case and we had the everywhere claim, so I sticked back to my plan, kill a VT if we had an extra claim. And you managed to skim even more throughout the day than vodean clever, becoming my number 1 vt suspect.pmchugh wrote:SCUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY!shieldgenerator7 wrote:UNVOTE
Awwww! I came too late! Anyway, nice case S7C. I'll look more into it tomorrow in D4.
-SG7 ()

jak111 wrote:Again, like I said earlier, your skimming is noted.Iron Butterfly wrote:aage wrote:I'm not sure what you're talking about. If he is at L-1 and I vote him (and I'm not another priest...), then it would automatically be the hammer, right?Iron Butterfly wrote:I understand and saw that there was a vote count. I would think the logistics would show his name but no vote/hammer. THAT is my point. Was that the proper way it is done or are people assuming he voted and did not hammer?
I did notice one mistake on my part, which is that I didn't unvote. Rules dictate that I should, so here she goes... Unvote vote S7C
Maybe Im just dumb. Whats to stop Everywhere to say he voted when he didnt?
Ya know what...whatever.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 0#p3764127
(Before vote count he is final vote. But since he is priest he didn't hammer)
Unless we were wrong on the vc, clever is already lynched, it just needs to be confirmed by safDoomYoshi wrote:Top of 107. I voted no lynch after realizing that none of the candidates were particularly good for lynches now and I don't want to pressure too many other players. As promised, I will still kill clever as I don't want to be a stick in the mud. Now that we have a deadline, let's get closer to it.

By 37 minutes (consdering aage needed the unvote). SG7 needs to be looked into tomorrow.shieldgenerator7 wrote:UNVOTE
Awwww! I came too late! Anyway, nice case S7C. I'll look more into it tomorrow in D4.
-SG7 ()
yup. if you were fastposted and it was like 1 minute, then maybe. but this is just trying to look town after the lynch.jonty125 wrote:By 37 minutes (consdering aage needed the unvote). SG7 needs to be looked into tomorrow.shieldgenerator7 wrote:UNVOTE
Awwww! I came too late! Anyway, nice case S7C. I'll look more into it tomorrow in D4.
-SG7 ()


I think you made a mistake here bud, not that is matters.safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
clever(11)- leehar, vodean, ghostly, IB,neb, jak, betiko, sound, shield, jonty, aage
vodean(2)- mob, chuck
everywhere(3)- edoc, dj, aage, pmc
no lynch(1)- doom
betiko(1)- clever
With 20 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.
Clever has been lynched, scene upcoming.

Fixed the numbering, rest is correct as is.pmchugh wrote:I think you made a mistake here bud, not that is matters.safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
clever(11)- leehar, vodean, ghostly, IB,neb, jak, betiko, sound, shield, jonty, aage
vodean(2)- mob, chuck
everywhere(3)- edoc, dj, aage, pmc
no lynch(1)- doom
betiko(1)- clever
With 20 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.
Clever has been lynched, scene upcoming.
