Moderator: Community Team
Human beings are not animals, not all our relationships are geared towards reproduction.john9blue wrote:younger = more likely to successfully bear children?thegreekdog wrote:Question - why do guys like young looking girls (i.e. the "teen" types)? Is there a particular psychological reason for that?
from an evolutionary standpoint
holy shitnatty_dread wrote:Human beings are not animals, not all our relationships are geared towards reproduction.john9blue wrote: younger = more likely to successfully bear children?
from an evolutionary standpoint
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I take it that you disagree.2dimes wrote:Says you.natty_dread wrote: Human beings are not animals, not all our relationships are geared towards reproduction.
What about heterosexual couples who don't want to (or can't) have children?2dimes wrote:No, you're sort of right. If it's a same sex relation there won't be any "reproduction."
Wow, I pity your sex life.2dimes wrote:They may still want to have sex until they're in like their 30s when they become too old.
At New Year's Eve back in '05 I was really drunk and ended up sleeping with this woman who must have been at least 31 or 32. It wasn't that bad, though, granted she'd had a lot of botox treatments so she didn't look quite so old and gross.2dimes wrote:They may still want to have sex until they're in like their 30s when they become too old.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
