Moderator: Clan Directors
agreedjackal31 wrote:Stalin is getting really interesting.....seems to be one of the best war games in a while. I think its the best game when two great teams clash and as code put it, when a mistake is made, it will determine who comes away with it. Great play from both sides thus far!!!
It also appears CCC is in the same boat... fantastic game there too!

Tell me about it!jackal31 wrote:Stalin is getting really interesting.....seems to be one of the best war games in a while. I think its the best game when two great teams clash and as code put it, when a mistake is made, it will determine who comes away with it. Great play from both sides thus far!!!
It also appears CCC is in the same boat... fantastic game there too!

I thought rail was a sure win, but its starting to scare me a little, I don't want it to turn into another cairns. Cairns and stalingrad might go to you guys, could be 22-18. I hope we get a little luck in one of those, 23-17 would make me feel sooooo much better : P Well, either way it should be a fun final round, gl guys : )jackal31 wrote:3 games left from the first two sets.....things are tightening up a bit.

You're talking about their age, right?jalen45 wrote:must be a 15 and under clan.

Disagreed.firstholliday wrote:agreedjackal31 wrote:Stalin is getting really interesting.....seems to be one of the best war games in a while. I think its the best game when two great teams clash and as code put it, when a mistake is made, it will determine who comes away with it. Great play from both sides thus far!!!
It also appears CCC is in the same boat... fantastic game there too!


firstholliday wrote:Make bamboo again please , we have no snapshot. Follow the rules.
Not again guys.

Why are you so vehement in asking for game recreation fh?firstholliday wrote:Those games are ok thats risk. BUT
firstholliday wrote:Make bamboo again please , we have no snapshot. Follow the rules.
Not again guys.
I will try to give a productive response. This rule is irritating, and causes problems like this. CC should look at implementing some sort of automatic snapshot for both sides as soon as the game starts. Or allow teams to take snapshots for eachother, although that would still mean that the team that goes first would have to remember to snap before playing.Leehar wrote:Why are you so vehement in asking for game recreation fh?firstholliday wrote:Those games are ok thats risk. BUT
firstholliday wrote:Make bamboo again please , we have no snapshot. Follow the rules.
Not again guys.
Com did say: 2011-10-10 10:21:52 - Commander62890: I took Sao Yok and Tamadju. Tennaserim is mine (red).FoW rule
Fog Rule:
If the second team to join a foggy game also gets the first turn, they must hold their attack for 12 hours or until a member of the opposing team announces that they have taken their snapshot. Should that team accidentally break this agreement, then they will give all relevant information to their opponents in the game chat. eg. territories taken during the first turn, plus the owners of any other territory thrown into the fog as a result of the attack (Note that this does not necessarily include attack information).
The rule can be ignored, if the following conditions are met;
a) No borders are shared by both teams at the start, such as Poland, Feudal, AoR, Woodboro etc.
b) If there is no intent to attack an enemy position, but to only drop, fort and leave, then the turn may be taken.
In short, the turn may be taken, if the enemy will not be losing a territory and are still able to see the map as it was on the original setup.
Once the second team to play, have their snap, they will announce it in the chat, so that the game can commence.
A breach of the rule will NOT result in the game being forfeited, unless; on game completion (when the fog is lifted), it shows that the information given, was incorrect.
It is also good practice (not obligatory), to have any clan member leave a reminder of the rule in the gamechat, once they see the game has started. Plus, for the clan leader to post a reminder on the clan forum.
Also, if the game is part of a tournament (created with privs), “12hr” could be included in the gaming label, eg “Home games, batch 2, 12hr rule applies”.
What else do you need? (unless he didn't tell about other terr. he possibly had surrounding it?)





jackal that is fine if you and LC want to resolve this yourselves, however, if the game is to be remade that decision needs to be made withing the next few hours because once turns start swaying the outcome one way or the other, its going to cause a huge fight between the clans. I will not push for a remake or not, but what im saying is that it needs to be decided very quickly before more turns are taken.jackal31 wrote:Listen gang, you guys should understand I have taken the privi's from BW for a reason, so Blitz and BW should not be given pm's regarding this scenario.
Secondly, I am already in communications with lc regarding this.
Thirdly, yes this happened in the last war, but Commander wasnt in that war and this is not something THOTA does all the time. This has been a great and fun war to this point. As Skill pointed out, Commander was kind enough to recognize his mistake and posted information about it. I have requested more information to satisfy the "needy", but personally, this is not a practice of THOTA to gain a tactical advantage. It was an honest mistake.
Please let lc and I handle this. The outcome will be posted and we will get this resolved. Until then, lets play the other games and continue to have fun.
