Moderator: Clan Directors



I'm not strongly opposed to it, just adds a little time to collect / create the data. I figured having all the previous F400 ratings right below it, you could easily find that information for 2 weeks, 1 month, or 6 months just by comparing the two numbers instead of that column always only showing 2 week differences.Dako wrote:What do you think about adding another column "rating +/-"? no change is not telling if any clan just got closer to the clan above him. Would be cool to see it as well.


This was updated as well. CL4 Ph 2 are not included, I don't have dates yet. I've started a thread last week to begin accumulating all data for CL4 because its so work intensive. I was busy / out of town late last week and all weekend.josko.ri wrote:You did not update which clan wars are included in Sep 15 Ranking. were CL4 phase 2 results included?




I'm not that familar with ACC rules, tho i think its based not on wins but on some scoring system? I would have to look at it. It might be awhile before i really look into it, I have other projects (like CL4) to get to first.Keefie wrote:Will the ACC matches, which are 33 team games + 8 singles, be included in the F400 ?



There is more than 1 vs 1 in ACC wars, the majority is team games.lord voldemort wrote:Im very much against 1v1 games being included in any ranking

FD just took the scores and divided by two. He told me that he had tested is couple different ways and the division was the easiest and made little difference.IcePack wrote:I'm not that familar with ACC rules, tho i think its based not on wins but on some scoring system? I would have to look at it. It might be awhile before i really look into it, I have other projects (like CL4) to get to first.Keefie wrote:Will the ACC matches, which are 33 team games + 8 singles, be included in the F400 ?
But, others are free to discuss it here for now until I've taken a look.
IcePack

Just curious, are you still using the original javascript I wrote, or have you made any changes? Good on you if you can decipher my code...IcePack wrote:I'm not strongly opposed to it, just adds a little time to collect / create the data. I figured having all the previous F400 ratings right below it, you could easily find that information for 2 weeks, 1 month, or 6 months just by comparing the two numbers instead of that column always only showing 2 week differences.Dako wrote:What do you think about adding another column "rating +/-"? no change is not telling if any clan just got closer to the clan above him. Would be cool to see it as well.
The graphs also show this info, just not as detailed as the charts by showing whether you've gone up, down, or remained flat.
IcePack




IcePack wrote:Update:
Since i was asked / pm'd about this i might as well provide an update. My original plan was to be updating this on the first of every month still.
Essentially, I've been out of town more than I thought I would due to RL issues. My wife has had to go to numerous out of town specialist / testing dates, and it's been determined she will need to have brain surgery performed.
For obvious reasons the next month or two, I'm assuming I'll be busier than planned / first expected. Since most of this has been out of town I haven't had access to my computer as often.
I should have part of the weekend free at home to do some work on updating this and CL4.
Thanks for your patience and understanding the next month or two while I sort out some stuff.
By the new year things should be back to normal, and I'll do it 1st and 15th again.
I'm also reducing my game count so the little time I do hve can be utilized on efforts like this.
Thanks,
IcePack






Important things first Ice. Best of luck with your wife. I hope she has a quick recovery fro surgery.Fewnix wrote:Appreciate what you have done, are doing and will do
![]()
![]()
IcePack wrote:Update:
Since i was asked / pm'd about this i might as well provide an update. My original plan was to be updating this on the first of every month still.
Essentially, I've been out of town more than I thought I would due to RL issues. My wife has had to go to numerous out of town specialist / testing dates, and it's been determined she will need to have brain surgery performed.
For obvious reasons the next month or two, I'm assuming I'll be busier than planned / first expected. Since most of this has been out of town I haven't had access to my computer as often.
I should have part of the weekend free at home to do some work on updating this and CL4.
Thanks for your patience and understanding the next month or two while I sort out some stuff.
By the new year things should be back to normal, and I'll do it 1st and 15th again.
I'm also reducing my game count so the little time I do hve can be utilized on efforts like this.
Thanks,
IcePack

My assumption is because CL4 results backdate, OTP had some rough loses in CL4. So they wouldn't have peaked at the score listed previously when you beat them.Dako wrote:I wonder what happened to our best showing this time. Last ranking it was best vs Otpisani (TOFU OTP 38 23 09/11/12) and now it vs PIG.



Ok - thanks for pointing it out. I'll look into and re-update tonight.Dako wrote:Ok, got that.
I also would like to say that I have found TOFU and z-TOFU in the database. Can you please fix it? Cheers.


Ok, should be fixed now. Updated database.IcePack wrote:Ok - thanks for pointing it out. I'll look into and re-update tonight.Dako wrote:Ok, got that.
I also would like to say that I have found TOFU and z-TOFU in the database. Can you please fix it? Cheers.
IcePack
