Conquer Club

BIG_John wrote:Josko and Random are the two biggest babies on this site! I see why everyone is leaving the site! Also nice to see the CDs backing the two biggest crybabies on here! I guess you have to try and handicap us because you can't beat us on normal terms so you have to rig it to give you a chance! Clan world = BIG JOKE!

BIG_John wrote:I am talking about Josko in this forum after you said if anyone kept talking about it would face consequences and the person kept talking about it and nothing ands I remember in CL7 Paul lost a medal, first contact spot, and we got a clan warning but nothing for this person. I understand you guys don't like us but the rules are rules why do we get punished for it and they don't?

josko.ri wrote:

BIG_John wrote:Josko and Random are the two biggest babies on this site! I see why everyone is leaving the site! Also nice to see the CDs backing the two biggest crybabies on here! I guess you have to try and handicap us because you can't beat us on normal terms so you have to rig it to give you a chance! Clan world = BIG JOKE!

Anyway it looks like we will beat you 5-3 in both home and away sets, even if the Usa 2.1 game was not replayed.
So do not act like you are some kind of dream team that nobody can beat because you definitely aren't

We can question for how long did your sitting abuse lasted and did you achieve your excellent results and top 1 ranking by constantly abusing the account sitting system. For example (this was not included in my report), today I found that FreeFalling123 sat 3 turns for jdw35 in Hive Game 16942551 including sitting in opening turn but in all 3 cases jdw35 played his other turns earlier that day normally. It seems like the sitting abuse was not limited only to the Usa 2.1 game but was more widespread practice.

I would really like if admin comes up publicly with details how often did FreeFalling123 logged in to other players accounts during CL8 games and was it sometimes for reasons which are not emergency sitting so that we can know how widespread his account sitting abuse was.

BIG_John wrote:I am talking about Josko in this forum after you said if anyone kept talking about it would face consequences and the person kept talking about it and nothing ands I remember in CL7 Paul lost a medal, first contact spot, and we got a clan warning but nothing for this person. I understand you guys don't like us but the rules are rules why do we get punished for it and they don't?

It was said to not talk about this issue in CL8 Premier League thread here: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 1&t=220017

However this is different topic, called CL8 Discussion Area, and discussions about CL8 related things are allowed in this topic.

BIG_John wrote:Josko and Random are the two biggest babies on this site! I see why everyone is leaving the site! Also nice to see the CDs backing the two biggest crybabies on here! I guess you have to try and handicap us because you can't beat us on normal terms so you have to rig it to give you a chance! Clan world = BIG JOKE!

rockfist wrote:After round 7, it will look about like this:

Top 23 GD36
TOFU 21 GD32
S&M 20 GD34
LHDD 20 GD14
Fallen 19 GD14
OSA 18 GD8

None of the others have a chance to win the overall title.

There is a chance TOFU could improve if we turn a game against PACK or a game or two against LHDD (we are struggling in that match).

Donelladan wrote: Rockfist, I only count 17 points for OSA after round 7.
And 16 for FOED, so actually FOED could still win ( though very unlikely, mathematically I think it's possible).

Donelladan wrote: I think it's still quite open, if TOP loses some point along the way. ( looks like FOED is taking some )

Donelladan wrote:Well, if we only consider the top 6 ranked from rockfist list.
TOP is facing TOFU and FALL.
TOFU is facing S&M and TOP
FALL is facing OSA and TOP
OSA is facing FALL and LHDD.

Looks like for the last 3 rounds, S&M and LHDD kinda have the easier ones... but well if we include the ongoing match ( round 7 and 8 ), then no one has an easy path.
Also the clan which aren't ranked top 6 aren't small clan either.
I think it's still quite open, if TOP loses some point along the way. ( looks like FOED is taking some )

Rockfist, I only count 17 points for OSA after round 7.
And 16 for FOED, so actually FOED could still win ( though very unlikely, mathematically I think it's possible).

“ your dispute against the Clan mods or with Icepack....has taken up more time than anyone could handle. This attitude has taken too long to be tolerated and we have reached that point where we had enough. You are hereby banned indefinitely so that you can contemplate your actions.

“No clear rules have been broken here. High ranked players or decent ranked players should know what they are getting into once they get invited. If the invitation was clear enough to tell what is going to happen, then accepting that invite, as a high ranked player, you are also liable for taking it. Does this practice also involved forcing anyone to play these games with him? I can understand the wrongdoing if the accused is targeting new recruits or low ranked players who will likely lose after the game but if we go further with this guideline in also including high ranked players, we are setting a dangerous precedent in telling everyone not to play and send invites in games or maps that we have grown to like. I agree that this kind of practice looks shady but there is also a point where, as a long time high ranked player, we should also be responsible of our own actions when we accept game invites. Let's not look at this report as only about the accused. Setting a precedent like this may also mean that any player who gets most of his points from playing a particular map is on his way of getting reported in the future. We might as well request the webmaster to put a limit on how many times you can play on each map which is not going to happen and no one would like.”

“ your dispute against the Clan mods or with Icepack....has taken up more time than anyone could handle. This attitude has taken too long to be tolerated and we have reached that point where we had enough. You are hereby banned indefinitely so that you can contemplate your actions.”

“No clear rules have been broken here. High ranked players or decent ranked players should know what they are getting into once they get invited. If the invitation was clear enough to tell what is going to happen, then accepting that invite, as a high ranked player, you are also liable for taking it. Does this practice also involved forcing anyone to play these games with him? I can understand the wrongdoing if the accused is targeting new recruits or low ranked players who will likely lose after the game but if we go further with this guideline in also including high ranked players, we are setting a dangerous precedent in telling everyone not to play and send invites in games or maps that we have grown to like. I agree that this kind of practice looks shady but there is also a point where, as a long time high ranked player, we should also be responsible of our own actions when we accept game invites. Let's not look at this report as only about the accused. Setting a precedent like this may also mean that any player who gets most of his points from playing a particular map is on his way of getting reported in the future. We might as well request the webmaster to put a limit on how many times you can play on each map which is not going to happen and no one would like.”