Conquer Club

sam_levi_11 wrote:that bit in my last post about needing to test them, it was a general statement, not aiming for a lynch, just agreeing with whoever said we need to know which is lying.

How would you know which is lying without lynching one of them? Or are you trying to direct the cop? That's just as scummy IMO (although pmc will disagree ). By the way, your input in this game has been zero. Who are your top suspects and why?

pmchugh wrote:Why havent some people replied to Sierra yet? More active people.

TODO-list:
2. drake_259 - needs to post more.
3. animorpherv1 - needs to be replaced.
4. Natewolfman - needs to answer to that question by pmc he ignored.
5. sam_levi_11 - needs to explain his last post.
8. cena-rules - needs to be replaced.
10. mr. incrediball - needs to be replaced.

Well, a lot of those people need to be replaced, so they won't be saying anything any time soon. Also, I believe I already mentioned drake's situation. It is interesting that nate has started to submarine, however.

Last I heard of cena he was on a ban, don't think it's permanent though.

Hmm, it has been awhile since we heard from the mod. We have not had a vote count yet. There appears to be no deadline yet. What good does summarizing this do? I have no idea...

spiesr wrote:Hmm, it has been awhile since we heard from the mod. We have not had a vote count yet. There appears to be no deadline yet. What good does summarizing this do? I have no idea...

There are hardly any votes to count, but I'll put one up. No deadline yet, but you can expect one soon.

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
Vote count

Natewolfman - 3 (pmchugh, spiesr, Nickbaldwin)
pmchugh - 1 (Natewolfman)
animorpherv1 - 1 (LSU Tiger Josh)

Not voting: animorpherv1, sam_levi_11, dunc_2007, drake_259, Sierra_Leon, cena-rules, mr. incrediball

With 12 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.

I'm replacing animorpherv1, mr. incrediball and cena-rules for inactivity.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

Sierra_Leon wrote:

sam_levi_11 wrote:that bit in my last post about needing to test them, it was a general statement, not aiming for a lynch, just agreeing with whoever said we need to know which is lying.

How would you know which is lying without lynching one of them? Or are you trying to direct the cop? That's just as scummy IMO (although pmc will disagree ). By the way, your input in this game has been zero. Who are your top suspects and why?

Nate is my main suspicion, for his bandwagon on PMC for nothing more than "a gut feeling" and continuing to try get him lynched after that. Also he didnt read the game AT ALL when replacing, which is hard to beleive, he's not a noob so he prolly did and wants to appear innocent by acting like it.

However, Spiesr bandwagoning on him, plus switch, who he replaced, acting so scummy day 1 he is high up on my suspicion.

You arent exactly in my good books either, for your relentless attempts to lynch me and put unneeded suspicion onto me and on your todo list you act like your totally in the clear and free of suspicion. But i think thats just generally wanting to find mafia badly.

Is it really bandwagoning when you are second to vote?

well i didnt see you provide any reason.

sam_levi_11 wrote:Nate is my main suspicion, for his bandwagon on PMC for nothing more than "a gut feeling" and continuing to try get him lynched after that. Also he didnt read the game AT ALL when replacing, which is hard to beleive, he's not a noob so he prolly did and wants to appear innocent by acting like it.

bandwagon? lol i was the first AND ONLY one to vote for PMC, how is that a bandwagon? and yes i have gone on gut feeling before (and both times i did i was correct!) and for future reference, in mafia games i am a complete noob lol, this is my 3rd game ever i do belive, and truth be told I havnt read the rules in any of them yet i glossed over is all *is going to start reading them from here on out though*

pmchugh wrote:Why havent some people replied to Sierra yet? More active people.

TODO-list:
4. Natewolfman - needs to answer to that question by pmc he ignored.

sorry its been a buisy week, what was the question again?

sam_levi_11 wrote:well i didnt see you provide any reason.

Did too.

spiesr wrote:

Sierra_Leon wrote:Please explain what part of pmc's posts you agreed with and what made you vote Natewolfman exactly.

The part where pmc called nate on how it was almost impossible for him to not realize the deadline and nate then ignoring it.

spiesr wrote:I side with pmc this time.
Vote Natewolfman

really now?
All your saying is you agree with pmc, but nothing specific. If one of you turns up scum ill be looking towards the other.

Natewolfman wrote:

sam_levi_11 wrote:Nate is my main suspicion, for his bandwagon on PMC for nothing more than "a gut feeling" and continuing to try get him lynched after that. Also he didnt read the game AT ALL when replacing, which is hard to beleive, he's not a noob so he prolly did and wants to appear innocent by acting like it.

bandwagon? lol i was the first AND ONLY one to vote for PMC, how is that a bandwagon? and yes i have gone on gut feeling before (and both times i did i was correct!) and for future reference, in mafia games i am a complete noob lol, this is my 3rd game ever i do belive, and truth be told I havnt read the rules in any of them yet i glossed over is all *is going to start reading them from here on out though*

Really? i thought id seen you in more, i stand corrected. Also read the feckin rules ejit! Joke. Read the rules, might just help.

sam_levi_11 wrote: Really? i thought id seen you in more, i stand corrected. Also read the feckin rules ejit! Joke. Read the rules, might just help.

haha, well ive played mafia with friends a ton of times, but im pretty new to online mafia

Sierra_Leon wrote:

Natewolfman wrote:I dont vote for pmc because he voted for me, im voting because of how quickly he is to jump on and hammer and hammer to divert attention, the last 2 games ive been in when a player did that he ended up being scum, and the fact that im attempting to defend myself and give calm rational views and your post seems to be all over the place and (in my mind) yelling, casts a heavy suspicion on you. now i say you dont feel like mafia because you have noone backing you up, so logically you would be a lone role AKA the werewolf.

I can't make heads or tails of this post.

pmchugh wrote:

to jump on and hammer and hammer to divert attention

What exactly am I meant to be trying to divert attention from?

This is a good question. Notice how it was ignored by Natewolfman.

The best advice I can give you nate is to read some posts yourself.

Unvote since Animo is getting replaced. Not all here right now so I'll reread later.

Nate, please explain how it was possible for you not to notice the deadline, assuming that you read the thread at all...

The thread i do read, i ready many updates as it goes, but for some reason i glossed over the time limit thats all, I didnt notice a time limit, i unvoted because drake had 3 votes and mine was strictly random vote and was worried that it would make me accidently lynch him

@Natewolfman: do you still think pmchugh is scum? If yes, can you quote the posts by pmchugh that give you this 'gut feeling' ?

@mod: please don't set a deadline too soon after replacing 3 players. They'll never have time to do anything but a hasty vote-before-deadline if you do.


PS: Happy 2009 everybody!

To be fair, the deadline announcement was rather clear.....

Stroop wrote:=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
Announcement: Deadline

The deadline for day 1 is set at exactly 2 weeks from the time of this post.

Deadline: Saturday, December 20th

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

So nick, what do you think about nate?

And just in case you missed that nate there was:

dunc_2007 wrote:Time is running out

dunc_2007 wrote:We'd best make it snappy, people.

Sierra_Leon wrote:Mod: What happens when there is no majority reached at the deadline?

This was also quoted and replied to by the mod:

Stroop wrote:

Sierra_Leon wrote:Mod: What happens when there is no majority reached at the deadline? It doesn't say anything about that in the rules.

Mafia Rules wrote:5. Lynching requires a majority of the town vote

Without a majority, there is no lynch.

Stroop wrote:=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=[/b
Vote count

drake_259 - 4 (Natewolfman, sam_levi_11, ace1217, switchblade)
switchblade - 3 (dunc_2007, drake_259, LSU Tiger Josh)
ace1217 - 3 (Sierra_Leon, Nickbaldwin, sheepofdumb)
sam_levi_11 - 1 (cena-rules)
Nickbaldwin - 1 (mr. incrediball)

Not voting: animorpherv1

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.

Deadline: Saturday, December 20th 12:30 pm GMT+1
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

[quote="Stroop]
Prodded ace1217. This is his second prod, if he doesn't post before the deadline, I will replace him during the night.
[/quote]

dunc_2007 wrote: Oh, unvote. We don't need to rush the lynch, seeing as we have 2 weeks.

I don't want to see Nate lynched before we hear from our future replacements, but getting a claim while we wait seems like a good idea. At least we're not wasting our time while waiting for the replacements this way.

Vote Natewolfman.

spiesr wrote:So nick, what do you think about nate?

Yeah, just ignore the that post. I looked back and saw that you already said that...

Nate are you going to claim or wait a while and see what the replacements have to say?

[Silence of the lambs] It puts the pressure on the wolfman!! [/Silence of the lambs]