Conquer Club

prowler back on topic or don't say anything. Stop trolling.

GabonX wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.

Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.

That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.

The truth is far, far more complex.

Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?

This never made sense to me.

Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.

captain.crazy wrote:

GabonX wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.

Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.

That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.

The truth is far, far more complex.

Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?

This never made sense to me.

Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.

Yeah, it's immoral for the government to force people not to rape and murder, they should just not do it out of the goodness of their hearts like Christ intended.

captain.crazy wrote:

GabonX wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.

Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.

That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.

The truth is far, far more complex.

Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?

This never made sense to me.

Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.

No! That would be communism!

F1fth wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:

GabonX wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.

Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.

That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.

The truth is far, far more complex.

Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?

This never made sense to me.

Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.

No! That would be communism!

Except for the entire first half of my statement. Christ taught that it is better to teach a man to fish... Meaning that it is better to work for yourself, so as not to burden others needlessly. Your version of this is government mandated, and is an open door for high level political corruptness.

Here's what happens when the kids of people who watch Fox News go out to protest...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=191g6Pc4tOM

They haven't even a cursory grasp of that which they are opposing. America. f*ck yeah.

... Compare that to the Obama voters in Philly. Pack of morons.

... More of the same.

... Isn't there a "Dumbing down of America" thread here someplace?

...

In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).

TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).

Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.

MeDeFe wrote:

TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).

Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.

Not the chicks I know.

TheProwler wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).

Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.

Not the chicks I know.

You're into hippies?

MeDeFe wrote:

TheProwler wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).

Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.

Not the chicks I know.

You're into hippies?

Nope, models. Slutty models.

TheProwler wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

TheProwler wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).

Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.

Not the chicks I know.

You're into hippies?

Nope, models. Slutty models.

Don't they usually wear panties (of whatever form) and little else?

MeDeFe wrote:Don't they usually wear panties (of whatever form) and little else?

Not around here. Those slutty little fresh as a daisy models that I am so into every night. Maybe it's a regional thing...?

You could start a poll.

TheProwler wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:Don't they usually wear panties (of whatever form) and little else?

Not around here. Those slutty little fresh as a daisy models that I am so into every night. Maybe it's a regional thing...?

You could start a poll.

If you're into them every night they won't remain fresh as flowers for long I think.

Oh, they're fresh all right...you just have to know what personal hygiene products to use.

TheProwler wrote:Oh, they're fresh all right...you just have to know what personal hygiene products to use.

With that form they can fulfill at least two functions.

There is clear bias in favor of Prowler's fantasies in this thread. Prowler, shut up you're full of shit. MeDeFe, your biasing the thread in favor of Prowler's trolling.

BIAS!


IN THE MEDIA!




(lol)

They aren't fantasies.
And if one of Prowler's models gets ill, he just fixes the puncture and inflates her again.
Hahaha!

Oh, it ain't air that I'm pumping into them, Jonesy old man.

Hahaha!!

You have to be a stud like me to understand.

"Document everyone of these traders, socialist, cowards who surrender to Islam and Communism"

The above video, which can be viewed without sound, was made by a conservative Catholic priest.

And the right wing isn't fascist, they say.

...no, it's your inflated ego.

jonesthecurl wrote:...no, it's your inflated ego.

moi?

pimpdave wrote:

jonesthecurl wrote:...no, it's your inflated ego.

moi?

He's just blurting out what we're all thinking.

jonesthecurl wrote:...no, it's your inflated ego.

Sorry, dave, that was for prowler and his pumping of his punctured models.