jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
We are getting into the stretch run now. Which player can the current playoff teams do without.
Yanks-Sabathia?
Red Sox- Youkilis?
Tigers-VerLander?
Angels-Abreau?
No way. With Hunter+Guerrero back the Angels have plenty of outfielders to cover any injury. I'd say that they can't afford any more pitchers to go down this season. Lackey would probably hurt the most, especially for the playoffs.
Does anyone at all think that the Rockies can catch the Dodgers for the NL West title? The Rockies are my team, so I would love it if they did, but I'm not sure. Dodgers are strong with some veteran "stretch-run" leadership in their corner, but the Rockies are playing some great baseball right now.
This series starting should determine a lot I think.
No way. With Hunter+Guerrero back the Angels have plenty of outfielders to cover any injury. I'd say that they can't afford any more pitchers to go down this season. Lackey would probably hurt the most, especially for the playoffs.
Good point.
2010-04-24 18:51:35 - MrMoody: OMG I'm in a game with stunna, what is up with this?
As well as Verlander has been pitching this year (and he's a Cy Young candidate for sure), he only pitches once every 5 games or so. Miguel Cabrera has been incredible. Without his bat in a lineup that has been quiet most of the year, Detroit would lose the little offense they've had.
As well as Verlander has been pitching this year (and he's a Cy Young candidate for sure), he only pitches once every 5 games or so. Miguel Cabrera has been incredible. Without his bat in a lineup that has been quiet most of the year, Detroit would lose the little offense they've had.
out of the AL central I like Detroit.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I don't think Chicago or Minnesota can catch Detroit unless the Tigers totally melt down. As much as I hate Boston and New York, I'm hoping the Red Sox win the wild card just so Detroit can play New York in the first round. I like the Tigers chances much more playing the Yankees in a 5 game series opposed to a 7 game series (if the Rangers win the wild card it would be Tigers-Angels and Rangers-Yankees, meaning assuming Tigers and Yankees won they would play in the ALCS)
safariguy5 wrote:The most you can use him for now is DH.
How have his defensive stats been the last several years anyway? Does anyone get that awesome digest every year of every conceivable stat, including the defensive rating of each player?
I read about it in Moneyball and have been curious to see it ever since.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
safariguy5 wrote:The most you can use him for now is DH.
How have his defensive stats been the last several years anyway? Does anyone get that awesome digest every year of every conceivable stat, including the defensive rating of each player?
I read about it in Moneyball and have been curious to see it ever since.
Stat Inc used to come out with books on the subject but have not published those books the past few years. Bill James came out with Range Factor and someone from Stat Inc came out with Zone Rating. Zone Rating is supposedly a more accurate account of someone's range at their particular position. As the story goes Stat Inc has someone at every ball game who assign's a zone to each fielder. http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/artic ... ne-rating/
AgentSmith88 wrote:I don't think Chicago or Minnesota can catch Detroit unless the Tigers totally melt down. As much as I hate Boston and New York, I'm hoping the Red Sox win the wild card just so Detroit can play New York in the first round. I like the Tigers chances much more playing the Yankees in a 5 game series opposed to a 7 game series (if the Rangers win the wild card it would be Tigers-Angels and Rangers-Yankees, meaning assuming Tigers and Yankees won they would play in the ALCS)
2007 Mets blow a 7 game lead with 17 games to play
1964 Phillies 6.5 game lead with 12 games to play
2008 Mets blow a 3.5 game lead with 17 games to play
Anything can happen in baseball, especially in September.
AgentSmith88 wrote:I don't think Chicago or Minnesota can catch Detroit unless the Tigers totally melt down. As much as I hate Boston and New York, I'm hoping the Red Sox win the wild card just so Detroit can play New York in the first round. I like the Tigers chances much more playing the Yankees in a 5 game series opposed to a 7 game series (if the Rangers win the wild card it would be Tigers-Angels and Rangers-Yankees, meaning assuming Tigers and Yankees won they would play in the ALCS)
2007 Mets blow a 7 game lead with 17 games to play
1964 Phillies 6.5 game lead with 12 games to play
2008 Mets blow a 3.5 game lead with 17 games to play
Anything can happen in baseball, especially in September.
I think what you should be saying anything can happen in baseball especially in the NL East.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
The Phillies are involved in 3 of the biggest collapses of all-time. Fortunately i wasnt born yet in 1964 but old-timers here still bitterly complain about that season.
Looks like Cole Hamels is back. Lidge may be as well.
hopefully the champs will be operating at optimum level during the post-season
AgentSmith88 wrote:I don't think Chicago or Minnesota can catch Detroit unless the Tigers totally melt down. As much as I hate Boston and New York, I'm hoping the Red Sox win the wild card just so Detroit can play New York in the first round. I like the Tigers chances much more playing the Yankees in a 5 game series opposed to a 7 game series (if the Rangers win the wild card it would be Tigers-Angels and Rangers-Yankees, meaning assuming Tigers and Yankees won they would play in the ALCS)
2007 Mets blow a 7 game lead with 17 games to play
1964 Phillies 6.5 game lead with 12 games to play
2008 Mets blow a 3.5 game lead with 17 games to play
Anything can happen in baseball, especially in September.
Yes, but all 3 of those teames MELTED DOWN. I said they wouldn't be caught if they don't melt down. Of course anything can happen. But if all 3 of those teams continued to win they they wouldn't have been caught. The 2006 Tigers had a minor meltdown and lost the division title on the last day of the year (still won the wildcard and went to the WS). They had been in 1st place since May (and have been in 1st place since June this year so I'm very aware they could suck it up and not make the playoffs.)