Conquer Club

Unvote guess my vote doesn't make sense any more, since it wasn't that serious

i'm just trying a little different approach then my previous games because being overly active either gets me lynched or nightkilled.

i'm just trying to find the right balance between being constructive to the forums, and not getting killed.

on top of that, stool pigeon style is new to me, so i'm trying to find out how this version is played.

in my opinion you are acting more scummy then i do, by trying to push into a lynch 'for your own personal reasons'.

zimmah wrote:i'm just trying a little different approach then my previous games because being overly active either gets me lynched or nightkilled.

i'm just trying to find the right balance between being constructive to the forums, and not getting killed.

on top of that, stool pigeon style is new to me, so i'm trying to find out how this version is played.

in my opinion you are acting more scummy then i do, by trying to push into a lynch 'for your own personal reasons'.

this was ment to hippo, i didn't realise there was a whole page in between

UNVOTE

Looks like RV stage is over.

As I've given my clue out and can't really discuss it more, I still would like to reiterate that I like seeing the votes on Zimmah at this time to gain us more information hopefully.

To the noobs that didn't quite realize who I was here are a couple of links that you may enjoy reading.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... war+mafia and http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... Revolution

EBWP

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:As I've given my clue out and can't really discuss it more, I still would like to reiterate that I like seeing the votes on Zimmah at this time to gain us more information hopefully.

To the noobs that didn't quite realize who I was here are a couple of links that you may enjoy reading.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... +war+mafia and http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... Revolution

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:As I've given my clue out and can't really discuss it more, I still would like to reiterate that I like seeing the votes on Zimmah at this time to gain us more information hopefully.

To the noobs that didn't quite realize who I was here are a couple of links that you may enjoy reading.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... war+mafia and http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... Revolution

here's my and any future roleclaim:

1) if i'm pigeon, i'm not even allowed to say it, and since there's only pigeon, informant, vanilla and scum, i can only claim vanilla and scum.

2) if i'm informant, i can also not claim informant or pigeon, so again, i can only claim vanilla or scum

3) if i'm vanilla, i can also just claim vanilla or scum

4) if i'm scum, i can also just claim vanilla or scum.

so i'll just claim now to save time.

i'm either vanilla or scum. and judging by the amount of scum that's usually in a mafia, i'd say there's about 30% chance of me statistically to be scum. there's a certain amount of chance i am hiding my true role, but even then it can be both very good or very bad.

now, that was informative, not

what exactly is the point of claiming, if everyone can only claim vanilla and/or scum?

should i just claim scum to keep everyone happy, cuz if i claim vanilla, people will think i'm scum, or should i just claim vanilla, because claiming scum will be seen as wifom?

i guess i'll let random.org decide.

There were 2 items in your list. Here they are in random order:

scum
vanilla

random.org said i should claim scum

ok, i'm scum

P.S. i hope the people will understand it's irony, and not really a scumclaim.

zimmah wrote:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:As I've given my clue out and can't really discuss it more, I still would like to reiterate that I like seeing the votes on Zimmah at this time to gain us more information hopefully.

To the noobs that didn't quite realize who I was here are a couple of links that you may enjoy reading.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... war+mafia and http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... Revolution

here's my and any future roleclaim:

1) if i'm pigeon, i'm not even allowed to say it, and since there's only pigeon, informant, vanilla and scum, i can only claim vanilla and scum.

2) if i'm informant, i can also not claim informant or pigeon, so again, i can only claim vanilla or scum

3) if i'm vanilla, i can also just claim vanilla or scum

4) if i'm scum, i can also just claim vanilla or scum.

so i'll just claim now to save time.

i'm either vanilla or scum. and judging by the amount of scum that's usually in a mafia, i'd say there's about 30% chance of me statistically to be scum. there's a certain amount of chance i am hiding my true role, but even then it can be both very good or very bad.

now, that was informative, not

what exactly is the point of claiming, if everyone can only claim vanilla and/or scum?

should i just claim scum to keep everyone happy, cuz if i claim vanilla, people will think i'm scum, or should i just claim vanilla, because claiming scum will be seen as wifom?

i guess i'll let random.org decide.

There were 2 items in your list. Here they are in random order:

scum
vanilla

random.org said i should claim scum

ok, i'm scum

Great stuff. We have our first lynch sorted!

you seriously want to lynch me too badly.

too bad people will just think it's OMGUS at this point but anyway:

unvote vote hippo

hippo, i do have a question for you.

you are saying you're trying to get me lynched for me not adding constructive things to the topic, however i personally think my few posts were by far more constructive then your crusade against me.

so, aren't there any better leads to follow, or are you just trying to get the attention away from you by trying to get the attention to someone else (in this case me).

because i noticed in other mafia games that succesfull scum usually is succesfull because they succesfully shift the attention towards someone else, and that way they fly under the radar, it seems to me like you're definitly doing this.

care to explain yourself?

if you really want to lynch me go ahead, you'll not only lose a townie, but also lose an opportunity to lynch some real scum. if you just want to random vote, be my guest. but i don't see how random voting is better then trying to actually find scum.

zimmah wrote:hippo, i do have a question for you.

you are saying you're trying to get me lynched for me not adding constructive things to the topic, however i personally think my few posts were by far more constructive then your crusade against me.

so, aren't there any better leads to follow, or are you just trying to get the attention away from you by trying to get the attention to someone else (in this case me).

because i noticed in other mafia games that succesfull scum usually is succesfull because they succesfully shift the attention towards someone else, and that way they fly under the radar, it seems to me like you're definitly doing this.

care to explain yourself?

if you really want to lynch me go ahead, you'll not only lose a townie, but also lose an opportunity to lynch some real scum. if you just want to random vote, be my guest. but i don't see how random voting is better then trying to actually find scum.

LOL ... make up your mind ... first you acknowledge you are scum now you say that you are townie. At least one of those is a lie, given your current desperation I suggest the latter. I am not surprised you are seeking to vote for me again - but your argument doesn't wash ... in fact quite the reverse. Cheers for the compliment though!

thehippo8 wrote:

zimmah wrote:hippo, i do have a question for you.

you are saying you're trying to get me lynched for me not adding constructive things to the topic, however i personally think my few posts were by far more constructive then your crusade against me.

so, aren't there any better leads to follow, or are you just trying to get the attention away from you by trying to get the attention to someone else (in this case me).

because i noticed in other mafia games that succesfull scum usually is succesfull because they succesfully shift the attention towards someone else, and that way they fly under the radar, it seems to me like you're definitly doing this.

care to explain yourself?

if you really want to lynch me go ahead, you'll not only lose a townie, but also lose an opportunity to lynch some real scum. if you just want to random vote, be my guest. but i don't see how random voting is better then trying to actually find scum.

LOL ... make up your mind ... first you acknowledge you are scum now you say that you are townie. At least one of those is a lie, given your current desperation I suggest the latter. I am not surprised you are seeking to vote for me again - but your argument doesn't wash ... in fact quite the reverse. Cheers for the compliment though!

Even though his zimmah's first claim was a scum claim, it was completely facetious. You can't actually count that. I do think the post wasn't the most townish post ever. However, still not a real claim. And he said as much in the post immediately following.

So, you are trying to ignore the fact that it wasn't a real claim and paint zimmah as a liar, which seems scummy to me. And you completely ignored any question he asked you while doing so.

chapcrap wrote:

thehippo8 wrote:

zimmah wrote:hippo, i do have a question for you.

you are saying you're trying to get me lynched for me not adding constructive things to the topic, however i personally think my few posts were by far more constructive then your crusade against me.

so, aren't there any better leads to follow, or are you just trying to get the attention away from you by trying to get the attention to someone else (in this case me).

because i noticed in other mafia games that succesfull scum usually is succesfull because they succesfully shift the attention towards someone else, and that way they fly under the radar, it seems to me like you're definitly doing this.

care to explain yourself?

if you really want to lynch me go ahead, you'll not only lose a townie, but also lose an opportunity to lynch some real scum. if you just want to random vote, be my guest. but i don't see how random voting is better then trying to actually find scum.

LOL ... make up your mind ... first you acknowledge you are scum now you say that you are townie. At least one of those is a lie, given your current desperation I suggest the latter. I am not surprised you are seeking to vote for me again - but your argument doesn't wash ... in fact quite the reverse. Cheers for the compliment though!

Even though his zimmah's first claim was a scum claim, it was completely facetious. You can't actually count that. I do think the post wasn't the most townish post ever. However, still not a real claim. And he said as much in the post immediately following.

So, you are trying to ignore the fact that it wasn't a real claim and paint zimmah as a liar, which seems scummy to me. And you completely ignored any question he asked you while doing so.

Agreed with chap.

Zimmah hasn't done anything that screams scum to me, which leads me to think he is town.

FOS for Hippo
Unvote for now

Bloody hell, I skip a day and have 4 pages to read! UNVOTE

FOS Hippo for the same reasons as above.

FoxMists wrote:Bloody hell, I skip a day and have 4 pages to read! UNVOTE

FOS Hippo for the same reasons as above.

Fine UNVOTE. I really have no beef with Zimmah and if you lot are satisfied with his posts then I will move on. I agree his post is facetious.

So, it's back to the drwing board. And in answer to Zimmah and Skill ... can I remind you all that we still have two players who are silent. In particular JenBroness and Victor Sullivan. To be fair Sully is a rediculously busy person and has at least posted once. FOS JenBroness. I would vote but perhaps it is time for me to take a back seat and listen for a while!

thehippo8 wrote:

FoxMists wrote:Bloody hell, I skip a day and have 4 pages to read! UNVOTE

FOS Hippo for the same reasons as above.

Fine UNVOTE. I really have no beef with Zimmah and if you lot are satisfied with his posts then I will move on. I agree his post is facetious.

So, it's back to the drwing board. And in answer to Zimmah and Skill ... can I remind you all that we still have two players who are silent. In particular JenBroness and Victor Sullivan. To be fair Sully is a rediculously busy person and has at least posted once. FOS JenBroness. I would vote but perhaps it is time for me to take a back seat and listen for a while!

vote hippo for the continual deflection. It has already been reported that jen was replaced in another game, likely to replaced in this one. I don't even think she confirmed, did she?

chapcrap wrote:

thehippo8 wrote:

FoxMists wrote:Bloody hell, I skip a day and have 4 pages to read! UNVOTE

FOS Hippo for the same reasons as above.

Fine UNVOTE. I really have no beef with Zimmah and if you lot are satisfied with his posts then I will move on. I agree his post is facetious.

So, it's back to the drwing board. And in answer to Zimmah and Skill ... can I remind you all that we still have two players who are silent. In particular JenBroness and Victor Sullivan. To be fair Sully is a rediculously busy person and has at least posted once. FOS JenBroness. I would vote but perhaps it is time for me to take a back seat and listen for a while!

vote hippo for the continual deflection. It has already been reported that jen was replaced in another game, likely to replaced in this one. I don't even think she confirmed, did she?

Yes she did confirm. Violet posted in another forum that she prefers to have people lynched than replaced ... hence my suggestion that at least by lynching JenBrowness we have an easy first day. This is no deflection, far from it. It is reasonable to pursue an avenue until it results in a conclusion. I am satisfied we have done that with Zimmah. What deflection are you talking about? Please explain yourself.

And to clarify it is no deflection vote JensBowness.

And to clarify it is no deflection vote JensBowness.

And to clarify it is no deflection vote JenBroness

LOL .. bolded coloured and spelt right!

BTW JenBroness is a guy. He explained his username once and he's a guy.

For now, I am suspicious of hippo, but perhaps not enough to cast a vote.

I would bandwagon Jen to make him come back here but it appears he has left the building. I'd prefer pressuring VS.

-SG7 ( )

thehippo8 wrote:

zimmah wrote:hippo, i do have a question for you.

you are saying you're trying to get me lynched for me not adding constructive things to the topic, however i personally think my few posts were by far more constructive then your crusade against me.

so, aren't there any better leads to follow, or are you just trying to get the attention away from you by trying to get the attention to someone else (in this case me).

because i noticed in other mafia games that succesfull scum usually is succesfull because they succesfully shift the attention towards someone else, and that way they fly under the radar, it seems to me like you're definitly doing this.

care to explain yourself?

if you really want to lynch me go ahead, you'll not only lose a townie, but also lose an opportunity to lynch some real scum. if you just want to random vote, be my guest. but i don't see how random voting is better then trying to actually find scum.

LOL ... make up your mind ... first you acknowledge you are scum now you say that you are townie. At least one of those is a lie, given your current desperation I suggest the latter. I am not surprised you are seeking to vote for me again - but your argument doesn't wash ... in fact quite the reverse. Cheers for the compliment though!

dude, the only two options are scum and vanilla, noone can claim anything else, obviously i just made a joke about it, because it's basicly pointless to claim.

no matter if i claim vanilla or scum, noone will believe me either way. especially not you, because you are on a crusade against me since the start of the game.

sar·casm   [sahr-kaz-uhm]
noun
1.
harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2.
a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.

i·ro·ny1   [ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-]
noun, plural -nies.
1.
the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.

unvote vote hippo

honestly I am just so frustrated with seeing them fighting each other. It would surprise me if they were both town, but this has GOT to stop..