Conquer Club

edbeard wrote:

DiM wrote:

nagerous wrote:What's with the D day and San Francisco rush?

i was thinking the same

I think cairnswk made a mistake.
San Francisco
16416 is the correct last update stat
but when I do a search for San Fran games (active, waiting and finished) I get 16870 results
D-Day
7070 is correct, but 7319 is the current number of games not 9310

yeh i did make mistakes - fixed now. F5

gimil wrote:I think conquest maps (feudal, realm, new worlds) should have their own section in the caterogy stats.

Are not Fuedal and Realm already in Fantasy. If i have placed New World in wrong category because of misinterpretation then i will fix it next fortnight. Having read the original post it could be in either, but you're correct it probably belongs in Fantasy.

cairns can we expect an update tomorrow?

gimil wrote:I think conquest maps (feudal, realm, new worlds) should have their own section in the caterogy stats.

i think cairns should have his own section aswel

gimil wrote:cairns can we expect an update tomorrow?

yep.

t-o-m wrote:

gimil wrote:I think conquest maps (feudal, realm, new worlds) should have their own section in the caterogy stats.

i think cairns should have his own section aswel

bah...outta here with ye.

t-o-m wrote:

gimil wrote:I think conquest maps (feudal, realm, new worlds) should have their own section in the caterogy stats.

i think cairns should have his own section aswel

you have more maps that some sections do

I think the sections cairns came up with should be heavily considered if/when start a game and game finder become more organized.

is new world fantasy?
im sure you put thought into it - but i would have said that was continental?
im probably wrong.

I have one sugestion-can you add to maps place movement like these
-----------------------------------------------------
^5-WWII Western Front
----------------------------------------------------
*0-WWII Eastern Front
----------------------------------------------------
these is example -the arrow up and number present that Western Front move for 5 places up in Table from previous update..only a sugestion.

t-o-m wrote:is new world fantasy?
im sure you put thought into it - but i would have said that was continental?
im probably wrong.

This was discussed previously and this map can be both from the front page of the map thread.
If you want it back in regional or whereevere, please discuss with Gimil etc. and let me know.

qwert wrote:I have one sugestion-can you add to maps place movement like these
-----------------------------------------------------
^5-WWII Western Front
----------------------------------------------------
*0-WWII Eastern Front
----------------------------------------------------
these is example -the arrow up and number present that Western Front move for 5 places up in Table from previous update..only a sugestion.

Qwert, thanks for suggestion. This column would be unnecessary in my format as the fortnight's previous statistics are in the right hand column. It would also be hard to maintain as maps are often added and the position in the table will change anyway.

Well can you then only add place number?
1.Classic
2.World2,.1
3.
4.
5.
6.

Understand what i say?

qwert wrote:Well can you then only add place number?
1.Classic
2.World2,.1
3.
4.
5.
6.

Understand what i say?

Yes. I'll see what i can do.

Oops. i thought this was due again today, but not until next weekend.

cairnswk wrote:Oops. i thought this was due again today, but not until next weekend.

I little to egar?

what happened here, where is your list for most maps played total per pages?

OK here are the stats for 29 June.
the way these are calculated now is being done differently.
Chipv has developed a Map Move java script (available in Add-ons) so i will be using this in future. Thanks Chipv...a lot less time searching.
There is no categorisation this fortnight until i work our how to develop this for the spreadsheet and work it in with the new calcauation format.

cairnswk wrote:OK here are the stats for 29 June.
the way these are calculated now is being done differently.
Chipv has developed a Map Move java script (available in Add-ons) so i will be using this in future. Thanks Chipv...a lot less time searching.
There is no categorisation this fortnight until i work our how to develop this for the spreadsheet and work it in with the new calcauation format.

Click image to enlarge.

you got games, how bout per pages? you dont do that one anymore?

Blitzaholic wrote: you got games, how bout per pages? you dont do that one anymore?

No. not necessary. Do know that there are 100 games per page.

cairnswk wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote: you got games, how bout per pages? you dont do that one anymore?

No. not necessary. Do know that there are 100 games per page.

Ahh, this is the way i wnated to do it in the first place...ALot less confusing. Keep up he good work cairns, much appreciated update!

Hi, cairnswk,

If you want categorisation, this can be built into the script, no probs. (In fact just ask for what you want, this script is very simple at the moment).

I would like to see average rounds per game completed per map. Anyone else think that might be fascinating? Also, unique players per map. Is that possible?

snapdoodle wrote:I would like to see average rounds per game completed per map. Anyone else think that might be fascinating? Also, unique players per map. Is that possible?

indeed it would be fascinating but only if it is split by number of players by cards and fortifiations or fog/ no fog.

a sunny 1v1 on Age of Realms: Might could be over in 3-4 rounds.
an assassin 6p on the same map with fog could take 30 rounds.

YES! That would be interesting.

Maybe that really has nothing to do with map movement, however...

I was just suggesting because the script is fresh it might be possible to collect the data?

pleasepleasepleaseplease

All possible, but the script would then slow down a lot. Since cairnswk is the only one running it, cairnswk has final say.