I voted gregwolf.colton24 wrote:Vote Count
Skoffin(3)-DCR,wercool, gregwolf121
PCM(1)-Rainbow Eater
Safariguy5(1)-captainwalrus
Not Voting:/, safariguy5, cowboyz,???
With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch
Moderator: Community Team
I voted gregwolf.colton24 wrote:Vote Count
Skoffin(3)-DCR,wercool, gregwolf121
PCM(1)-Rainbow Eater
Safariguy5(1)-captainwalrus
Not Voting:/, safariguy5, cowboyz,???
With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
that is too funny. you killed yourself./ wrote:That Cop was /, thank you very much.
I can see this and have been thinking that you are not a PGO because of this./ wrote:Anyways, as much as I would like to claim PGO, I doubt it would fool scum anyways, since they are the ones who killed /, I'd imagine.
1. If I were a PGO , why would I shoot me from behind rather than when I walked in?
True this would be an easy claim and I was going to bring up point 1 if you did claim./ wrote:2. If I were a PGO I would claim so, I have to reason to deny it.
They could have been role blocked, forgot to send in night actions, or your investigation might have thwarted their attempt or changed their plans/ wrote:3. If I were a PGO, Where did scum's kill go? / Was the only one to die that night.
Why does anyone need to be replaced? Could be Christmas break and no computer, I have no idea./ wrote:4. If I am scum who voluntarily killed /, why did I need to replace?
revert to my answer for number three./ wrote:5. If I were Scum who automatically killed /, why was there only one kill?
there are more than two possibilities, but these two are some of them./ wrote:This leave only two possibilities, I am unknowingly an auto-killer, scum's kill was blocked somehow.
Then why was it at your house?/ wrote:/'s death had nothing to do with me, it was a scum night kill.

you have no votes on you because we took them off until a new player arrived./ wrote:It's quite pointless, Being visited by a cop means you killed a cop?
You are still missing the main point, there is no way that "I" had voluntarily made a kill, what you are accusing me of is that, I am scum who was investigated, and I therefor killed the cop.
How would Leading an investigation in anyway lead to a scum retaliation? This was night one, there was no evidence, how do you suppose scum would not only track the cop's action, but receive the result on the same night then off him?
If I had visited /, that would be reason for a claim, but there is absolutely no significant reason to suspect I could have visited him more than anyone else in the entire game, so what exactly are you accusing me of? The only role that would hold plausibility would be a PGO, which is a town role..... So your only possible motivation is to out a townie?
Also Skoffin has been gone since November, so...yeah.
Anyways, I don't need to claim, I have no votes on me, and town claiming needlessly just allows scum to be more selective in their kills.
Also vote Rainbow Eater, your accusations all game have been confusing and scummy.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
I was your biggest proponent after night 1 and wanted a replacement to speak and shed some light on what happened last night before a quick lynch. Your character really did not seem like scum at all. Then after the past 2 pages where you constantly dodged the question of who you were and then tried to pass the blame, how am I suppose to believe that you are vanilla?/ wrote:Could you just save some time and modkill next time, colton?![]()
Cpl. Nancy Van Huegostrach-Town Soldier, vanilla role. *waits for scum to bring up BWCS and hammer*

It was necessary, you had a lot of votes on you, and you were a prime suspect. The only reason you did not have votes on you at the time was because we were waiting for a replacement./ wrote:I already explained, I've learned not to claim unnecessarily.
uhmm it was at your house. You can say it doesn't matter but it does because you were investigating you and died while doing it./ wrote:There was no reasonable evidence to suggest foul play.
/ wrote:I'm just like any other townie, so why don't YOU claim?
It also gives us one more name to narrow down on the "Guess who" should we lynch and not lynch. By acting defensive like you did just seems like you are hiding a scum role and can't come up with a lie./ wrote:it gives you all one more justification to lynch me without seeming scummy, and it give scum one more name to narrow down on their "Guess who" of important roles
Information goes both ways, town needs to know who is town and by hiding and being deceptive like you did you seem scum./ wrote:That is, for every role Scum knows to be unimportant, the more likely they are to hit a valuable role, especially in a small game like this.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
here heredeathcomesrippin wrote:That was a confusing day. I am glad for some sleep.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
