MAFIA- ATHF THE SOLE MAFIA (HOUSSAM) WINS THE GAME!!!

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:17 pm

I think that's enough proof. and it was funny.

Vote: Geegel

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:20 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:OK.. time to stop throwing random accusations. This is not a good situation at all. We need to look at the data and see if we can make this work.

First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:

1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.

2. There is a pretty high possibility that we still have a doctor, that protected last night's target. Either we started off with 2 docs, or we had a nurse that got a promotion after our doc was killed.

Now, with 3 nights gone, our cop should have 3 names he can provide us data on. So here is a strategy I suggest – it’s bold, but absent that I am not sure what else to do.. I am thinking that the Cop should come out with his list of investigations so far. This should give us 3 names that are either cleared or have some scum in them.. since no one came out after anyone that diligently, I think that odds are that he will come up with 3 confirmed townies – which is just as good. I have 100% confidence in Fircoal. This makes 5 confirmed townies, in addition to the cop. That gives us 6 out of 12. we will at least not lynch someone stupidly – and hopefully will have one or 2 more nights of information..

COP: PLEASE DO NOT SAY ANYTHING UNTIL WE CONFIRM THAT THIS IS THE STRATEGY WE ARE FOLLOWING.

Thoughts anyone?

I like the idea. The cop will give us 3 confirmed townies (or some mafia) plus the cop will be confirmed townie, and fircoal is a townie, and everyone knows themself to be a twonie.

That is six s right there, meaning we will only have to look at 6 people, and 3 or four of them will be mafia

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:21 pm

Unless the cop investigated fircoal, then we would only have 5 confirmed townies.

I still think it is worth it though.

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:21 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
geegel wrote: Also asking for the cop to reveal himself this early in the game is a very scummy move.

This early?? Has the gentleman from Romania missed the fact that we are down F I V E townies, and with ZERO more information than we had on day 1?

It only seems too risky. The Mafia might know who the doc is or might kill him by chance and with him out what would happen to our lovely cop now in the open?

I'd rather be paranoid, suits me better.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:22 pm

No, I am not the cop btw.

when I said "I know geegel is mafia" I dont actually know, but I am pretty sure that he is from what the evidence tells us.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:25 pm

Machiavelli wrote:No, I am not the cop btw.

yeah.. I noticed. I was kinda thinking you were since you were uncharacteristically quiet at the beginning of the game..

So I guess we have a strategy. The only thing missing is the cop's concensus.

crazy thought... but.. has anyone ever been in a game where there was no cop??

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:26 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
geegel wrote:Just to get the party started,

Vote: Puff
You very first post, you put the third vote on someone.

geegel wrote:I don't have any reason to FOS, but I have reasons to vote. As townies our only weapon is the lynch squad, if we don't use it we're toast.

Also, this early in the game it is next to impossible to point at somebody
Just because we didnt have anything to go on yet, you shouldnt try to bandwagon someone right away.

geegel wrote:I'll FOS cmckinney and rudders for not posting at all. there may be others, but these I was able to spot.

If we're gonna lynch somebody, let's at least lynch somebody inactive, as they are more likely to be scum.

so...

unvote puff

vote cmckinney

If any of these inactive guys posts I'll gladly unFos/ unvote
Now you unvote and vote someone else…

geegel wrote:unvote cmckinney

Thanks for showing up again
Then you unvote him...

geegel wrote:vote pyro55

Another absent player
But quickly vote someone else...

geegel wrote:
pancakemix wrote:Look, first off, pyro posted his vote on the last page. It has taken us two days to get eight votes for puff. He's one vote away from getting lynched. You want to try and convince us that we should change our minds even though some of us (like yours truly) will not change their vote and we'll end up with no lynch. That would not be good.
You have a point. Gah...

unvote pyro

vote puff
Then you vote puff, your only reasoning being that it will be hard to lynch anyone else!

geegel wrote:I's still prefer to lynch an inactive (death to beats), but it's better to lynch somebody than nobody at all

There wasnt even a de@dline at the time, there was no rush!!!

geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
Senfive wrote:Lets see the First 2 pages of this thread are pure spam between you and the evil smiley face guy. Tell me that isn't spam Fircoal. that gets you no where. Point proven.
Point taken, but I don't only spam, and what do you except the 1st 1-3 pages are going to be? Most 1st day random votes go nowhere. Do you have something against me?

Also, I see your point on Pancakemix, but I don't think it's enough to lynch him. Many people bandwagoned on Puff. These are the 9 people on the Puff bandwagon, these also are suspicious, Mach, CBlake, Houssam, Pancakemix, dcowboy, Roger Dodger, Slim_Jesta, Pyro55, geegel.
Although my name is on the list, I have to agree with you. In my defense, I did try at two different points to swing the mob, but I was unsuccessful.

Also as Roger and dcowboy are , the list grows thinner. For now

FOS Houssam and FOS Pancakemix

because they are in the critical position for the bandwagon swing

You say they were at the critical position for bandwagoning, but you are the one who actually put the final vote on, puff. Also, you were the third person to vote puff, but then you unvoted.

geegel wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:
geegel wrote:Things are stalling.

vote houssam

Please don't bandwagon people, give the man a chance a defend himself
huh? Against what exactly?? Is this because I did not post as much today? was supposed to fly out ended up airport hopping since 4 in the morning till 5 in the afternoon - dorve 500 miles (yeah. I am not in the best of moods! ) but seriously, if it's not for lack of posting - then tell me what your theory is and I will gladly defend myself.
Whatever. I'm too tired to think straight now. I'll take a fresh look tomorrow

For now:

unvote houssam

Your voting patterns are erratic!

geegel wrote:No one is sticking for pancakemix and if he were to be mafia, his pals should.

Houssam though is once again bandwagoning.

FOS Houssam

Vote Houssam
More crazy voting...

geegel wrote:Oh crap.

Fine let's have a lynch.

unvote houssam

vote pancakemix

MB, get to lynching

Again, you switch your vote, AND KILL A TOWNIE!!!

geegel wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:
everywhere116 wrote:Im sorry I havent been posting. Busy weekend. Since we have to vote someone, Vote Pancakemix
This is a redundant vote since pancake mix is already . If he turns out to be mafia, then my money is on everywhere116 being a close friend!
Do you have a hunch there Houssam? You are still on the top of my list

If he's at the top of your list, WHY DID YOU JUST KILL SOMEONE!!!

geegel wrote:No I won't disregard it . Actually if I think about, the fact that pancake was a townie sort of exonerates both Senfive and Mach. They entered the argument with me convinced that I was sticking for pancake to protect brother scum. That means that they were sure that pancake WAS scum. Uninformed means to me , but of course it also means that they aren't the bright bulbs they think they are. Of course they might just be playing dumb.
And I never said I thought pancake mix was mafia, I siad that if he was mafia so were you.

Without lynching we stand no chance, absolutely none, zilch, nada. Yes, I did vote a lot, but I wasn't hiding, nor blame someone else for my decision. Does it look suspicious? Sure it does. It's supposed to. It's what townies do. They talk, they vote, they FOS and are not afraid to stand in the spotlight.

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:28 pm

still really im deciding not to vote to geeglem although ur evidence machiavelli was enough and very funny but i think we need to make sure of some1 first like some1 aint playing if he even not a mafia he must be a useless citisen not trying to help

Senfive · Post by **Senfive** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:28 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:OK.. time to stop throwing random accusations. This is not a good situation at all. We need to look at the data and see if we can make this work.

First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:

1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.

2. There is a pretty high possibility that we still have a doctor, that protected last night's target. Either we started off with 2 docs, or we had a nurse that got a promotion after our doc was killed.

Now, with 3 nights gone, our cop should have 3 names he can provide us data on. So here is a strategy I suggest – it’s bold, but absent that I am not sure what else to do.. I am thinking that the Cop should come out with his list of investigations so far. This should give us 3 names that are either cleared or have some scum in them.. since no one came out after anyone that diligently, I think that odds are that he will come up with 3 confirmed townies – which is just as good. I have 100% confidence in Fircoal. This makes 5 confirmed townies, in addition to the cop. That gives us 6 out of 12. we will at least not lynch someone stupidly – and hopefully will have one or 2 more nights of information..

COP: PLEASE DO NOT SAY ANYTHING UNTIL WE CONFIRM THAT THIS IS THE STRATEGY WE ARE FOLLOWING.

Thoughts anyone?
I like the idea. The cop will give us 3 confirmed townies (or some mafia) plus the cop will be confirmed townie, and fircoal is a townie, and everyone knows themself to be a twonie.

That is six s right there, meaning we will only have to look at 6 people, and 3 or four of them will be mafia

Wow nice going on getting on quee same pattern as Pancake. I am sorry about Pancake I really am. He didn't help himself at all with his voting pattern and not posting any substance what so ever.

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:31 pm

vote everywhere116 trust me on this one guys please

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:32 pm

vote : senfive
dont ask me why all if he is a citizen just vote me next ok???if u think im scum but he was the 1st to vote pancakemix its just an instinct c'mon

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:32 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:No, I am not the cop btw.
yeah.. I noticed. I was kinda thinking you were since you were uncharacteristically quiet at the beginning of the game..

So I guess we have a strategy. The only thing missing is the cop's concensus.

crazy thought... but.. has anyone ever been in a game where there was no cop??

Yep, but it's not a good example for this type of game.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:33 pm

CBlake wrote:vote everywhere116 trust me on this one guys please

Are you 100% sure?

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:33 pm

CBlake wrote:vote everywhere116 trust me on this one guys please

If you are the cop just claim...

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:33 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
CBlake wrote:vote everywhere116 trust me on this one guys please

If you are the cop just claim...

claimed

please vote for him

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:34 pm

chessplaya wrote:vote : senfive
dont ask me why all if he is a citizen just vote me next ok???if u think im scum but he was the 1st to vote pancakemix its just an instinct c'mon

scum tactic!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:34 pm

chessplaya wrote:vote : senfive
dont ask me why all if he is a citizen just vote me next ok???if u think im scum but he was the 1st to vote pancakemix its just an instinct c'mon

Are you claiming to be the cop too?

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:34 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
CBlake wrote:vote everywhere116 trust me on this one guys please
Are you 100% sure?

109 % sure

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:34 pm

chessplaya wrote:vote : senfive
dont ask me why all if he is a citizen just vote me next ok???if u think im scum but he was the 1st to vote pancakemix its just an instinct c'mon

See - that's why we really can't afford to go with the "trust me votes" anymore!! Should we trust you? or trust CBlake?? or Geeg E l (happy?:) )

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:34 pm

vote everywhere 116

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:34 pm

CBlake who else did you investigate?

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:35 pm

Fircoal wrote:CBlake who else did you investigate?

none of the mafia

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:35 pm

but one(everywhere)

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:35 pm

here's who I think are scum (in order)

1. everywhere116
2. Chessplaya
3. Geegel

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:35 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
chessplaya wrote:vote : senfive
dont ask me why all if he is a citizen just vote me next ok???if u think im scum but he was the 1st to vote pancakemix its just an instinct c'mon

Are you claiming to be the cop too?

Chessplaya. please answer this.