Moderator: Community Team
Read this please. I don't care what motives the French and the English exactly have, but I think it's unquestionable that we should kill all Muslim defenders (i.e. also Haggis).edocsil wrote:The year is 1187, Saladin, Sultan of Egypt, has reconquered the city of Jerusalem from the Franks, nearly 100 years after they conquered the city in the First Crusade. The Pope has called for another crusade to win back the Holy Lands, and the French and English armies have arisen to the call. They are commanded by none other then Richard the Lionheart himself.
The Third Crusade has begun!
So you don't care that after they finish killing the muslims, the english will then be easily killed of by the third faction(probably french)?aage wrote:Read this please. I don't care what motives the French and the English exactly have, but I think it's unquestionable that we should kill all Muslim defenders (i.e. also Haggis).edocsil wrote:The year is 1187, Saladin, Sultan of Egypt, has reconquered the city of Jerusalem from the Franks, nearly 100 years after they conquered the city in the First Crusade. The Pope has called for another crusade to win back the Holy Lands, and the French and English armies have arisen to the call. They are commanded by none other then Richard the Lionheart himself.
The Third Crusade has begun!
You just posted the mod quote saying that there are indeed french and english "armies".aage wrote:If French is indeed the other faction, I don't think it'll matter whether I'm part of it or part of the English faction. Stop trying to make me claim my role, it won't work. You should've been dead by now, by any means.
It'd be best for the french yes. Not so much for the english ...aage wrote:If the french and english are going to put up a fight, it'd be best if the muslim faction were down at that point. vote haggis <-- I suggest all french and english troopers copy-paste that.
They lost one bloke and had the nice Mr. Saxlad go: "ok, I'm the english doctor, Tails is my patient, if i protect him for 2 more nights he gets an awesome power role".aage wrote:Because the English lost one bloke? lmao. The Muslims probably get another kill tonight. If you're as venerable as you say you are, I suggest you choose someone who smells of onions, wine and cheese. For now I'll say bye-bye. I can't even believe I'm discussing this with you
Well, I don't usually consider myself easily manipulated and I don't think that it happened here either. This definitely has more than 1 faction (probably 3+), so I don't think it's a really good idea to let any off them completely out grow any other. There have been quite a few rather interesting characters through game which I would benefit from this more than most of us would, so I'm just trying to balance it out.aage wrote:That's not a reason to let the muslim faction NK away. Every dead muslim is a step closer to Jerusalem. Every dead french or english guy is just a waste of time and resources.
Let me ask you a question, Commander9. Why do you think the English and the French have to fight each other in the end? Except that an investigated muslim tries to save his sorry ass by making the remark?
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
If I were town and there would be two mafia groups (which is what this game looks like from anyone's perspective, if you're right) it's best to eliminate one of the two mafia factions (relatively these are mafia factions, since they're "enemies" of anyone's faction). (This is getting very theoretical, I hope you're still with me.) This is because it would take away one random factor, i.e. the night kill of this third mafia faction, in this case the Muslim faction. Either faction is better off without them since neither of them can predict what side the muslims will choose, not to mention the fact that they will back stab the other two factions once these are decimated, or the unknown abilities these muslims have. Night kill? Does it stop there? English army seems to have a cop and a doc already, so if all factions are equal the muslims also have a doc and a cop which can also randomly tip the scales into either the English or the French faction's favor.Commander9 wrote:Well, I don't usually consider myself easily manipulated and I don't think that it happened here either. This definitely has more than 1 faction (probably 3+), so I don't think it's a really good idea to let any off them completely out grow any other. There have been quite a few rather interesting characters through game which I would benefit from this more than most of us would, so I'm just trying to balance it out.aage wrote:That's not a reason to let the muslim faction NK away. Every dead muslim is a step closer to Jerusalem. Every dead french or english guy is just a waste of time and resources.
Let me ask you a question, Commander9. Why do you think the English and the French have to fight each other in the end? Except that an investigated muslim tries to save his sorry ass by making the remark?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
By the same logic, in a 3 player game it's ALWAYS best to eliminate one of the players, no matter what the situation? No because it doesn't matter wether you come in 2nd or you come in 3rd, you still lose.aage wrote: If I were town and there would be two mafia groups (which is what this game looks like from anyone's perspective, if you're right) it's best to eliminate one of the two mafia factions (relatively these are mafia factions, since they're "enemies" of anyone's faction).
(This is getting very theoretical, I hope you're still with me.) This is because it would take away one random factor, i.e. the night kill of this third mafia faction, in this case the Muslim faction.
Pure speculation. I might as well say that maybe the muslims don't even have a NK anymore(which is quite possible). The only facts are: Muslim leader and second in command are down, this makes the muslims the weakest right now, so the "OMG they're going to kill us all" theories are really misplaced.aage wrote: Either faction is better off without them since neither of them can predict what side the muslims will choose, not to mention the fact that they will back stab the other two factions once these are decimated, or the unknown abilities these muslims have. Night kill? Does it stop there? English army seems to have a cop and a doc already, so if all factions are equal the muslims also have a doc and a cop which can also randomly tip the scales into either the English or the French faction's favor.
Except the two dogs fighting are the english and muslims. We both have men down and men compromised. And what are the french doing, waiting comfortably.aage wrote:Haggis, the story pretty much refers to the fact that there's europeans on the move who are going to kill some muslims. What part of that don't you get?
Yes, it is pure speculation, but nonetheless it's true. I don't know if this goes for English as well, but in Dutch there's a saying, "when two dogs fight for a bone the third walks away with it". In this case I think it's best to first get rid of that third dog, and then see how many bones we're actually talking about. We might not need to fight.
Uhm, because we actually have to make an alliance before i start fighting for you? Right now I'm trying to convince the english guys that what I'm saying makes sense.aage wrote:Also, Haggis, do tell me why you're not voting or at least FoS'ing everyone who votes for theSaxLad? I mean, he claims to be English, and you're saying it's wise to kill French people. You might want to dig into that instead of sitting at the side saying "they're accusing me but killing me won't get them anywhere". Persuade me to vote someone else, if you can. I really don't see you trying anything yet. If you really believe what you're saying all the time, I find it strange you haven't done all that yet
My example was referring to your scenario in which the French and the English arrive at the gates of Jeruzalem and say "hey, you know what, I actually don't like you". But okay, your scenario could be possible too... Except that you don't know my alignment, and you don't know the alignment of everyone who is scumarining. The muslims might be a fighting dog, but in that case he's fighting against the french and the english in the solution I put forward in that post you're quoting.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Except the two dogs fighting are the english and muslims. We both have men down and men compromised. And what are the french doing, waiting comfortably.aage wrote:Haggis, the story pretty much refers to the fact that there's europeans on the move who are going to kill some muslims. What part of that don't you get?
Yes, it is pure speculation, but nonetheless it's true. I don't know if this goes for English as well, but in Dutch there's a saying, "when two dogs fight for a bone the third walks away with it". In this case I think it's best to first get rid of that third dog, and then see how many bones we're actually talking about. We might not need to fight.
Also, in the first sentence you deny the existence of 3 groups, but in both the previous posts and even in the second sentence of this post you acknowledge the existence of 3 groups(dogs) ...
Why should I trust that? Any beans you like to spill?Iliad wrote:So to avoid the French getting too much power vote Saxlad and eliminate their doctor. Trust me, he is the French bodyguard.