Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Yes, I remember. That is why i figured your role must have been up to something. And I saw the message; I was the first one to see it, after you and fir of course. Its good you asked to be replaced if you didn't want to play anymore, but it still caused suspicion because it happened at a highly climatic point in that game. That was a really fun game until that whole princess dilemma. Sigh.Commander9 wrote: Yes, but remember that I said I wanted to just quit, and screw it overall, but I asked to be replaced. I could have just gone down as an inactive and died out or be modkilled, but I asked to be replaced instead. If you'd like to, I can find the exact msg.
I am very sorry strike. I misspoke. I thought i was suggesting what was best. I would be quite glad if you stayed in the game, and I wouldn't mind waiting for a week. Up to the mod though.strike wolf wrote:This is probably going to be my last post in any mafia game for a while but vio addressed replacing me and I just thought I'd say this now before I came back to find out that I have been. I will most likely not be paying attention to any of my mafia games over the next so many days however I should be back in less than a week and would prefer not to be replaced (this goes for the Matrix mafia as well). However if Iliad feels I should be replaced than that's fine.
That is true, but some people like to metagame. It can be quite fun. If a game was mentioned, I will comment on it.Anarkistsdream wrote:Whatever happened in that game has no bearing here, so let's not focus on it.


virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
QFTCommander9 wrote:Well, to be fair, there's really not that much to post for. I won't vote yet (as there's no hurry), but if I would, it would be the same ol' TWO as I've yet to see a more compelling case around.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Party hearty. Love to hear what you have to say. I have my own thoughts to add as well, be seeing as it is 4 AM here I am less then inclined to make another superpost like I did in the SF Mafia.naxus wrote:Replaced here but got slammed in RL should reread and post by tommorow.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Whatever happened in that game has no bearing here, so let's not focus on it.
I agree wholeheartedly with Nark on this Violet. That scenario between you was ridiculous in the first place, and has no place here. Please don't continue to bring this up. Actually I think this sheds light on your play style: you grasp on to a suspect based on an imagined sleight (see CK's "misogynistic" statement and why you wanted to vote for him.) That is no reason to vote for someone as it does not stem from character persuasion or story, and obviously was a joke. Really it's just poor play. If you actually took offense to that quip, then I suggest avoiding play with him (he has disappeared anyway). I feel like that, coupled with active submarining whilst presenting no case is detrimental to the town's interests. Even if you were to give us some weak case, it would be better than "oh he's an asshole let's get rid of him." vote Violet until something better comes along.Violet wrote:Yes, I remember. That is why i figured your role must have been up to something. And I saw the message; I was the first one to see it, after you and fir of course. Its good you asked to be replaced if you didn't want to play anymore, but it still caused suspicion because it happened at a highly climatic point in that game. That was a really fun game until that whole princess dilemma. Sigh.
+1 to you, sir. I love one-liners and cheesy catch-phrases.edocsil wrote:Party hearty.
Nice flavor. This makes it sound like we have 2 distinct kills then, pretty obvious that it is a SK and a Mafia, working under the assumption we don't have a trigger happy Vig running around.Iliad wrote:Since there is a bit of confusion about the thread title, I'll clear the purpose behind it.
The thread titles are all episode names from season 3. Treat them like night scenes: mostly just for flavour, but sometimes there are subtle hints and references to the events on the television show.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Thank you for the explanationIliad wrote:Since there is a bit of confusion about the thread title, I'll clear the purpose behind it.
The thread titles are all episode names from season 3. Treat them like night scenes: mostly just for flavour, but sometimes there are subtle hints and references to the events on the television show.
edoc wrote: Here are the people who voted on the last No Lynch tail, campin, /, ga7, streaker, edoc, safariguy5, fircoal, aage, commander9, flores, skoff, herk, haggis
Err, either you're trying to mislead people or you meant people who voted at all... I definitely hope it's the latter.Iliad wrote:Vote count
sens-2 tail, campin
vio-5 /, ga7, streaker, edoc, safariguy5
two-3 fircoal, aage, commander9,
skoff-1 flores
fircoal-1 skoff
aage-1 herk
campin-1 haggis,
It takes 10 to lynch, 2 days left
Eh, I think I said it right, if poorly perhaps. Those were all the people who were voting as of the final VC and were at least attempting to contribute in some way.Commander9 wrote:edoc wrote: Here are the people who voted on the last No Lynch tail, campin, /, ga7, streaker, edoc, safariguy5, fircoal, aage, commander9, flores, skoff, herk, haggisErr, either you're trying to mislead people or you meant people who voted at all... I definitely hope it's the latter.Iliad wrote:Vote count
sens-2 tail, campin
vio-5 /, ga7, streaker, edoc, safariguy5
two-3 fircoal, aage, commander9,
skoff-1 flores
fircoal-1 skoff
aage-1 herk
campin-1 haggis,
It takes 10 to lynch, 2 days left
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
That's what I wanted to hear - just making sure. However, while I do understand this type of argument, it's not a very strong one - we didn't have any really strong cases @ Day 1 and I can understand in way how it ended. It's definitely better to at least to try catching a scum (mathematically anyways), but this is not strong enough case for me to vote. It does deserves FoS to them, however.edocsil wrote:Eh, I think I said it right, if poorly perhaps. Those were all the people who were voting as of the final VC and were at least attempting to contribute in some way.
Ordinarily I would agree, but Vio's name was on that list, the one who I thought should be lynched yesterday, I will call that two strikes, but your right it isn't a terribly solid case. Unfortunately we really don't have an info to go on because of yesterdays lack of action.Commander9 wrote:That's what I wanted to hear - just making sure. However, while I do understand this type of argument, it's not a very strong one - we didn't have any really strong cases @ Day 1 and I can understand in way how it ended. It's definitely better to at least to try catching a scum (mathematically anyways), but this is not strong enough case for me to vote. It does deserves FoS to them, however.edocsil wrote:Eh, I think I said it right, if poorly perhaps. Those were all the people who were voting as of the final VC and were at least attempting to contribute in some way.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Fair enough. Since we've got time, I just want to avoid a quick lynch, but some pressure probably wouldn't hurt.edocsil wrote:Ordinarily I would agree, but Vio's name was on that list, the one who I thought should be lynched yesterday, I will call that two strikes, but your right it isn't a terribly solid case. Unfortunately we really don't have an info to go on because of yesterdays lack of action.
I have same thoughts, but it may be better if mod would prod/replace him rather than just taking a quick lynch. Besides, if we'd go for him now, he probably wouldn't come to defend himself.Anarkistsdream wrote:TWO hasn't made a post on here in some time... I hate to say it, but that just strengthens my opinions towards lynching him.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
ga7 wrote:Well, I was pretty set on Vio yesterday and rereading even though she's a bit more active she gives off a scummy vibe to me. It's quite sad we had to waste day 1 with a no lynch instead of getting it right the first time though -_-
TWO has gone absolutely inactive, his last post being 11 days ago, he posted in another game he had midterms though so that might explain it. He's a valid inactive lynch either way, but I prefer the added scummy juice with a Vote Vio
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

Apologies for that. I had midterms on Thursday and Friday so I didn't have much of a chance to post, and I've been unconscious for most of the weekend. I'm rereading, now.Anarkistsdream wrote:TWO hasn't made a post on here in some time... I hate to say it, but that just strengthens my opinions towards lynching him.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD