Conquer Club

Vote Hank Why are we looking for people associated with him when we can just vote the man himself?

-Sully

shieldgenerator7 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Ok, then, for you I will do my

SG7's Game Summary!

Not much has happened so far.
1. Joke votes
2. Freezie claims miller
3. Many doubters appear, some skeptical
4. Hank asks about "mafia alliances"
5. Town goes AWOL,
6. evilchaos votes hank,
7. TheFissk votes evilchaos with no reason,
8. TheFissk is pressured, unvotes, town bandwagons him
9. jonty BW on TheFissk,
10. nag claims "poor logic" and votes for jonty
11. chu votes nag for voting n00b

I may have missed a few things but that's basically it.

You basically got it all, that was pretty accurate. It should be mentioned that Fissk later tried to explain his vote. Instead of summing it up, I suggest you go find it and read it yourself so you can draw your own conclusions. It happened a few pages ago.

shieldgenerator7 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Ok, then, for you I will do my

SG7's Game Summary!

Not much has happened so far.
1. Joke votes
2. Freezie claims miller
3. Many doubters appear, some skeptical
4. Hank asks about "mafia alliances"
5. Town goes AWOL,
6. evilchaos votes hank,
7. TheFissk votes evilchaos with no reason,
8. TheFissk is pressured, unvotes, town bandwagons him
9. jonty BW on TheFissk,
10. nag claims "poor logic" and votes for jonty
11. chu votes nag for voting n00b

I may have missed a few things but that's basically it.

I don't know if that was intentional, but reading this summary was hilarious!

That pretty much sums it up, but I advise you to read everything after Freezie's claim, AoG. Although the summary sounds pretty good, it is the details that matter.

Here is Fissk's explanation of his vote. If you read nothing else, you have to read that, as it prompted the last page or two worth of votes. I would advise reading everything after it as well.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3162858

hey thats awesome i got something you have to[/] read

note: "have to" was supposed to be bold

after many long hours of figuring I've discovered a formula that knows exactly you chances of winning

simply insert the number below beside you name and solve for X
-1. Fircoal
-2. Streaker
-3. karelpieterje
-4. shieldgenerator7
-5. Victor Sullivan
-6. Army of God
-7. Rodion
-8. Hank44Soccer
-9. shaggydan
-10. sheepofdumb
-11. kratos644
-12. jonty125
-13. Mr. Squirrel
-14. jimfinn
-15. Haggis McMutton
-16. nagerous
-17. freezie
-22. TheFissk
-19. jug68
-20. Commander9
-21. evilchaos

x21+231x20+25025x19+1689765x18+79721796x17+2792167686x16+75289668850x15+1599718388730x14+27188611869881x13+373100999802531x12+4154823851430525x11+37600535086859745x10+276019109275035346x9+1634980697246583456x8+7744654310169576800x7+28939583397335447760x6+83637381699544802976x5+181664979520697076096x4+284093315901811468800x3+298631902863216384000x2+186244810780170240000x+51090942171709440000

after many long hours of figuring I've discovered a formula that knows exactly how much of your post was funny

Answer: 0%

Fissk, give me a GREAT reason not to vote on you.

Army of GOD wrote:Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Victor Sullivan wrote:Vote Hank Why are we looking for people associated with him when we can just vote the man himself?

-Sully

I just realized something - where is the little bugger? He hasn't posted at all since his clarification to the question, which left a lot to be desired.

Unvote vote Hank

TheFissk wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

nagerous wrote:

jonty125 wrote:unvote vote Fissk for voting a player with no reason (at the time of voting) and then providing a weak defense.

Fissk is a new guy and he is learning, he had his reasons and now has come accross as a little scummy by backtracking. However, I personally think that he is innocent and just trying to hunt leads and play the game. However, you've come accross to me now as just a bandwagoner trying to hide in the middle of the wagon.

My vote goes on you, unvote vote jonty

Jonty is a new guy and he is learning, he probably had his reasons and now has come accross as a little scummy. However, I personally think that he is innocent and just trying to hunt leads and play the game. However, you've come accross to me now as just a bandwagon starter trying to get an easy lynch across.

My vote goes on you, unvote vote Nagerous

i think you could have been a little more creative than just copying his post and changing the last sentence but i guess their are time constraints...

plus i have half a mind to vote for you for a similar same reason everyone is bandwagoning me (at least you tried to explain your self) but i'll hold for now...

OUt of everything that has happened, this is what strikes me as the most scummy..Nag defended Fissk, who's a new player..nothing out of the extraordinary.

But fissk threatening fircoal because he voted nag? Fissk pretty much defended nag in return for the vote he got, and nothing else.

Nag wouldn't make that mistake..however fissk did one on his behalf

unvote

Vote: fissk

Rodion wrote:Fissk, give me a GREAT reason not to vote on you.

Never do today what you can put off 'til tomorrow
-William Pulteney, Earl of Bath, English MP

I see that you have made three spelling mistakes
-Thomas de Mahay, Marquis de Favras, French aristocrat, his last words upon reading his death sentence before being
guillotined

life is not defined by your achievements but the mistakes you make, don't let this be one.

TheFissk wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

nagerous wrote:

jonty125 wrote:unvote vote Fissk for voting a player with no reason (at the time of voting) and then providing a weak defense.

Fissk is a new guy and he is learning, he had his reasons and now has come accross as a little scummy by backtracking. However, I personally think that he is innocent and just trying to hunt leads and play the game. However, you've come accross to me now as just a bandwagoner trying to hide in the middle of the wagon.

My vote goes on you, unvote vote jonty

Jonty is a new guy and he is learning, he probably had his reasons and now has come accross as a little scummy. However, I personally think that he is innocent and just trying to hunt leads and play the game. However, you've come accross to me now as just a bandwagon starter trying to get an easy lynch across.

My vote goes on you, unvote vote Nagerous

i think you could have been a little more creative than just copying his post and changing the last sentence but i guess their are time constraints...

plus i have half a mind to vote for you for a similar same reason everyone is bandwagoning me (at least you tried to explain your self) but i'll hold for now...

I think that post went right over your head, as well as many other's heads. The point was basically that I was copying his response and applying it to his vote of Jonty. The thing that I find suspious about it is that he seems to let you (TheFissk) slide while he didn't let Jonty slide. They're both noobs doing noobish things. Can you please explain to me why you'll defend one but not the other Naggy?

TheFissk wrote:

Rodion wrote:Fissk, give me a GREAT reason not to vote on you.

Never do today what you can put off 'til tomorrow
-William Pulteney, Earl of Bath, English MP

I see that you have made three spelling mistakes
-Thomas de Mahay, Marquis de Favras, French aristocrat, his last words upon reading his death sentence before being
guillotined

life is not defined by your achievements but the mistakes you make, don't let this be one.

This type of defense is only excusable if it's Mandy doing it. Then for some odd reason it seems perfectly normal.

Freezie are you trying to impute that there is some form of dodgy relationship between me and fissk because that is defamatory and I can sue your ass for that.

Fissk, wow that is not helping your case at all, if you don't buck your ideas up, I'm going to be joining your wagon.

Fastposted by Mr. Fircoal, so I will address your point. Fissk voted a guy for no reason and was instantly jumped upon, he then provided his reasoning but feeling pressure from it unvoted. However a wagon quickly developed with Jonty sneaking in a vote. Whilst Fissk's vote was noobish it didn't initially warrant to me as a scummy, it was brash and I don't think a noob scum would be that brash in a random vote but would instead attempt to blend in. Jonty's vote on the other hand came accross as me as very sly, trying to sneak a vote in and agree with the majority opinion which is a scum tactic, this I did not like.

Harder than a diamond in a ice storm, will read up and post something tommorow(hopefully)

Vote Count:

Fircoal (1) - shieldgenerator7
Army of God (1) - kratos644
Hank44Soccer (2) - Victor Sullivan, evilchaos
jonty125 (1) - nagerous
Mr. Squirrel (1) - sheepofdumb
nagerous (2) - Fircoal, Army of God
TheFissk (6) - Streaker, shaggydan, ???, jonty125, Mr. Squirrel, freezie L-5
evilchaos (1) - jimfinn

With 21 alive it takes 11 to lynch

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

Rodion wrote:We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

Announcement: naxus is replacing karelpietertje

nagerous wrote:Freezie are you trying to impute that there is some form of dodgy relationship between me and fissk because that is defamatory and I can sue your ass for that.

I am trying to impute that he may be defending his scum mate. Go on and sue me for that..we're all playing mafia here, however.

Hank44Soccer wrote:

Rodion wrote:We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

Why? So you and your scum buddies can kill him off?

Hank44Soccer wrote:

Rodion wrote:We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

FoS: Hank

Why? There is no reasons for another claim today, especially not on something that doesn't change a lot on the gameplay...

Doublevoter is very most likely town ( Otherwise it screws the mafia '' outnumber town'' win condition..) and as far as I know isn't going to be a drastic turn on who we're going for..


Why not look out for the doc and cop today as we're at it?

kratos644 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Way to tip your hand. unvote vote kratos

He's trying to get people off nag, so he's obviously working with him. I don't like it...smells like scum.