Recovering Multis

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:24 pm

Levon wrote:still not right

I smell another multi

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:26 pm

i smell a crucible type witch hunt

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:28 pm

awesome lets do it. but you've got to admit a newbie sympathizing with a busted multi with a rhyming name? suspicious

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:32 pm

Yes, Levon was a multi of Anon, that he just made today in fact, apparently to "sympathize" with himself. He has since been busted.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:33 pm

i was busted simply because i am new and i sympathize with someone thats shitty rules. i cant beleive i can be busted on strictly circumstancial evidence. busted anon may have been not right but this is now where near right.
who decides who gets busted anyway. i cant believe a person could be that stupid

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:34 pm

^^lol

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:37 pm

Levon wrote:i was busted simply because i am new and i sympathize with someone thats shitty rules. i cant beleive i can be busted on strictly circumstancial evidence. busted anon may have been not right but this is now where near right.
who decides who gets busted anyway. i cant believe a person could be that stupid

No you were busted with plenty of proof.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:38 pm

wicked wrote:
Levon wrote:i was busted simply because i am new and i sympathize with someone thats shitty rules. i cant beleive i can be busted on strictly circumstancial evidence. busted anon may have been not right but this is now where near right.
who decides who gets busted anyway. i cant believe a person could be that stupid
No you were busted with plenty of proof.

like what?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:40 pm

The various methods we use to bust multi's are not shared. If you dispute the bust, you can follow the instructions in the email you should have rec'd or PM lackattack.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:43 pm

the methods are oddly remiscent of McCarthyism. and i will danm well "dispute the bust"

what,me worry? · Post by **what,me worry?** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:43 pm

Levon wrote:
wicked wrote:
Levon wrote:i was busted simply because i am new and i sympathize with someone thats shitty rules. i cant beleive i can be busted on strictly circumstancial evidence. busted anon may have been not right but this is now where near right.
who decides who gets busted anyway. i cant believe a person could be that stupid
No you were busted with plenty of proof.
like what?

well.......we could throw you into a lake with a stone around your neck. if you float, your a multi, if you sink your telling the truth.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:44 pm

^i sorta like that idea

and, if you guys wanna hear th edumbest flame thread ever, go to the flame wars, and the one at the tope titled P Gizzle

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:46 pm

what,me worry? wrote:
Levon wrote:
wicked wrote:
Levon wrote:i was busted simply because i am new and i sympathize with someone thats shitty rules. i cant beleive i can be busted on strictly circumstancial evidence. busted anon may have been not right but this is now where near right.
who decides who gets busted anyway. i cant believe a person could be that stupid
No you were busted with plenty of proof.
like what?
well.......we could throw you into a lake with a stone around your neck. if you float, your a multi, if you sink your telling the truth.

i said McCarthyism not witch hunt asshole

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:48 pm

No one else sees what a load of crap this is? i am getting banned for being sympathitic to someone and making an account today. did everyone else who made an account today get banned or just the ones with a conscience?

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:49 pm

sfhbballnut wrote:
Levon wrote:still not right
I smell another multi

thanks for throwing me under the bus too

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:51 pm

That is not the reason for your ban. Your name came up on the same IP as Avon's, so a further investigation was done. That's all I can say, take it up with Lack.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:51 pm

i use concealme on game sites

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:54 pm

besides i am at the library

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:57 pm

Well it's a good thing we have more info to go off of than that.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:59 pm

what else could you have i have only had this account for like 7 hours

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:00 pm

Wow, that's a long time to be at the library.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:02 pm

i came back after work to check this account seems like a mistake to me

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:09 pm

when i first got to the library i saw a guy playing this game. since i liked risk i asked him how to join he showed me but he told me it wasnt a good idea cause you get banned alot.

i guess he was right. this game sucks if the threat of getting banned is hanging over you head all the time espcially for people like me who use public computers

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:15 pm

no, most people only get banned once.

Levon · Post by **Levon** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:17 pm

i dont want to get banned at all because i havent done anything wrong

Recovering Multis

Have you been banned for Multi?