Moderator: Community Team
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Well, I agree that burning the books is stupid. Mostly however, because it is against the entire teaching of his chosen religion, and therefore hypocritical to the point of insanity. I do however respect his right to speak his opinion of another religion, but more importantly, respect his right to speak it, even if it does possibly include some risk. If we were to somehow restrict the speaking of an opinion because that opinion was deemed dangerous, there would never be a freedom of speech. The fact that there may be consequences of said speech is the exact reason for the freedom in the first place.2dimes wrote:I like most people was not happy about Planes crashing into buildings on our safe plot of dirt.
It pisses me off to think that some moron would burn books and try to get it to happen again! Please leave the Island.
Crazy leaders of crazy people..AAFitz wrote: Granted, we invaded two entire countries based on the acts of a relatively small number of crazy people ourselves.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Because it's the only redeeming quality of the concept purely from an entertainment perspective.AAFitz wrote:Well, I agree that burning the books is stupid. Mostly however, because it is against the entire teaching of his chosen religion, and therefore hypocritical to the point of insanity.
Those Muslims who burn bibles are either fanatics or simply ignorant , so are those who support such actions . If a Christian group wishes to mimic that behaviour then they should expect to be held in equal contempt , as of course should their own supporters.Night Strike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles yet some countries do these same things toward Christianity on a frequent basis? If it's okay for Iranians to burn the bible and crosses, why isn't it ok for others to burn the koran?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Sanity is in the eye of the beholder.GabonX wrote:Crazy leaders of crazy people..AAFitz wrote: Granted, we invaded two entire countries based on the acts of a relatively small number of crazy people ourselves.
Whats ironic, is that it is probably those who do not believe in any God, that defend the right of those to worship any God. It seems those that have chosen and actually believe, only believe in the right to believe in that single God or religion.john9blue wrote:Us Christians need to learn how to threaten violence when freedom of expression gets in our way. Maybe then we'd be taken more seriously!
I would hardly call it a stink. More of a comical topic to discuss.BigBallinStalin wrote:Good job, guys. All this stink over some guy who should've been indefinitely put on "hold" in our minds. Eventually, they hang up.
Terry, you've been reading this?BigBallinStalin wrote:Good job, guys. All this stink over some guy who should've been indefinitely put on "hold" in our minds. Eventually, they hang up.
Well Im hardly advocating the idea and only suggesting they have their right.2dimes wrote:AA; I agree with everything but this.Because it's the only redeeming quality of the concept purely from an entertainment perspective.AAFitz wrote:Well, I agree that burning the books is stupid. Mostly however, because it is against the entire teaching of his chosen religion, and therefore hypocritical to the point of insanity.
And even though he's only providing the crazys with an excuse not a reason. I don't think they need one and they might have not bothered until that excuse finally convinced them. "Now we have to."
Absolutely astonishing.HapSmo19 wrote:The only difference between this and a flag burning, or the burning of an effigy, is the level of psychosis of those that will be offended.
It's simply an acid test of the purity of their tolerance. I, for one, wont be surprised at the results.

No, see, it is stereotyping because he said "Why do Muslims". He in no way tried to declare a difference between the radical terrorists and the every day normal Muslims.GabonX wrote:That's not stereotyping brother..Army of GOD wrote:Congratulations for continuing to stereotype an entire religion.Night Strike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles yet some countries do these same things toward Christianity on a frequent basis? If it's okay for Iranians to burn the bible and crosses, why isn't it ok for others to burn the koran?
That's statement of facts coupled with a very legitimate question.
Of course it is and obviously so. It borders on possibly being against the bigotry guidelines of CC in fact.Army of GOD wrote:No, see, it is stereotyping because he said "Why do Muslims". He in no way tried to declare a difference between the radical terrorists and the every day normal Muslims.GabonX wrote:That's not stereotyping brother..Army of GOD wrote:Congratulations for continuing to stereotype an entire religion.Night Strike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles yet some countries do these same things toward Christianity on a frequent basis? If it's okay for Iranians to burn the bible and crosses, why isn't it ok for others to burn the koran?
That's statement of facts coupled with a very legitimate question.
What about that abortion doctor that was killed by a Christian? Should I say "Why do all Christians make threats and violence whenever someone is supporting abortion"?
Nightstrike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles...
Yeah, but if they're right and the other six and a half billion people are wrong, you're in deep doo-doo.Army of GOD wrote:I laugh, I lose.
I lost at "On Halloween night, Grizzard and the 14 members of the Amazing Grace Baptist Church"
OH NOES! NOT ALL 14 MEMBERS!!!!
OK. What if they just put a really, really bad crease in the binding? Do you still think anyone would get blown up?heavycola wrote:Absolutely astonishing.HapSmo19 wrote:The only difference between this and a flag burning, or the burning of an effigy, is the level of psychosis of those that will be offended.
It's simply an acid test of the purity of their tolerance. I, for one, wont be surprised at the results.
Islam is a religion, not a race, so there is no "confirming racism" in my post.AAFitz wrote:Of course it is and obviously so. It borders on possibly being against the bigotry guidelines of CC in fact.Army of GOD wrote:No, see, it is stereotyping because he said "Why do Muslims". He in no way tried to declare a difference between the radical terrorists and the every day normal Muslims.GabonX wrote:That's not stereotyping brother..Army of GOD wrote:Congratulations for continuing to stereotype an entire religion.Night Strike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles yet some countries do these same things toward Christianity on a frequent basis? If it's okay for Iranians to burn the bible and crosses, why isn't it ok for others to burn the koran?
That's statement of facts coupled with a very legitimate question.
What about that abortion doctor that was killed by a Christian? Should I say "Why do all Christians make threats and violence whenever someone is supporting abortion"?
Nightstrike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles...
He is a racist. He simply enjoys confirming it on a regular basis. No doubt he will eventually go too far and embarrass all of Team CC in doing so. In my opinion he just has. In any case, I hope he truly believes what he wrote because on my signature its viewable 7500 times, unless of course its deemed racist and unfit for the CC forums, as I personally think it should be.
At least Hell would contain all of the people that matter in the world.jonesthecurl wrote:Yeah, but if they're right and the other six and a half billion people are wrong, you're in deep doo-doo.Army of GOD wrote:I laugh, I lose.
I lost at "On Halloween night, Grizzard and the 14 members of the Amazing Grace Baptist Church"
OH NOES! NOT ALL 14 MEMBERS!!!!
I shouldn't need to instruct you on how Christianity works, given that I'm not one -Night Strike wrote:Why do Muslims make threats and violence whenever they are offended by an action such as depicting Muhammed or burning their bibles yet some countries do these same things toward Christianity on a frequent basis? If it's okay for Iranians to burn the bible and crosses, why isn't it ok for others to burn the koran?