Moderator: Tournament Directors
<laughing out loud> Dude, that's my sad, little world...I gotta pretend to be good at pretending to play war. <grin>HighlanderAttack wrote:holy crap batman--a lot of work put into this already--I will get a team together an post--I like how you put me second behind you in your example

Woodruff, I like that you have no limit to the number of athletes on a team. However, many track & field events do limit the number of entrants a team may submit for any given event. I would encourage you to consider implementing such a limit. Otherwise, the competition may come down to whose team is the largest. A team of 30, for instance, could theoretically have 6 entrants in each and every event which would likely skew the odds too strongly in their favor.Woodruff wrote:THE TRACK MEET is designed to simulate a track meet (high school, club level, college, professional, whatever). As such, you don’t win without a team. I am putting no maximum limitation on the number of members of any team that is interested in participating in this track meet…after all, it happens in real life that different teams have differing numbers of members on their respective teams. I am, however, placing a minimum number of four members on any given team.
....
An athlete may only be allowed to enter a maximum of five events (including the relays) OR the decathlon. However, each individual member cannot enter a single event more than once. If an athlete participates in the decathlon, they are ineligible for all other events. An athlete may, of course, enter as few as one event.

Agreed. In theory if I could put together a large enough team I could have more entrants than the entire rest of the field combined. Otherwise I love the idea.MudPuppy wrote:Woodruff, I like that you have no limit to the number of athletes on a team. However, many track & field events do limit the number of entrants a team may submit for any given event. I would encourage you to consider implementing such a limit. Otherwise, the competition may come down to whose team is the largest. A team of 30, for instance, could theoretically have 6 entrants in each and every event which would likely skew the odds too strongly in their favor.Woodruff wrote:THE TRACK MEET is designed to simulate a track meet (high school, club level, college, professional, whatever). As such, you don’t win without a team. I am putting no maximum limitation on the number of members of any team that is interested in participating in this track meet…after all, it happens in real life that different teams have differing numbers of members on their respective teams. I am, however, placing a minimum number of four members on any given team.
....
An athlete may only be allowed to enter a maximum of five events (including the relays) OR the decathlon. However, each individual member cannot enter a single event more than once. If an athlete participates in the decathlon, they are ineligible for all other events. An athlete may, of course, enter as few as one event.
king sam wrote: quit facebook stalking me... and Im a sailor all I do is drunk, cuss and make illegitimate kids when Im away from CC
dont sig that
Sweet...glad to have you (outstanding photo, by the way).BigBallinStalin wrote:From the people who've invented everything, McGill University has now entered the competition:
I can definitely see that potential, you're right. I suppose if a team were to attempt to enter what I would consider an outrageous number of entrants, I would cap them. My logic in not doing so initially is that by having that large of a number of entrants, while they may be giving themselves the greatest chance of winning, they're also giving themselves individually the smallest chance at a premium prize. So I would like to think that at a certain point, they would split into two groups instead of one, simply out of self-interest. So I will reserve the right to put a cap if necessary, but I am hoping it will not be (I'll add this to the rules...you're the second person to mention this to me). Thanks for that.MudPuppy wrote:Woodruff, I like that you have no limit to the number of athletes on a team. However, many track & field events do limit the number of entrants a team may submit for any given event. I would encourage you to consider implementing such a limit. Otherwise, the competition may come down to whose team is the largest. A team of 30, for instance, could theoretically have 6 entrants in each and every event which would likely skew the odds too strongly in their favor.Woodruff wrote:THE TRACK MEET is designed to simulate a track meet (high school, club level, college, professional, whatever). As such, you don’t win without a team. I am putting no maximum limitation on the number of members of any team that is interested in participating in this track meet…after all, it happens in real life that different teams have differing numbers of members on their respective teams. I am, however, placing a minimum number of four members on any given team.
....
An athlete may only be allowed to enter a maximum of five events (including the relays) OR the decathlon. However, each individual member cannot enter a single event more than once. If an athlete participates in the decathlon, they are ineligible for all other events. An athlete may, of course, enter as few as one event.
king sam wrote: quit facebook stalking me... and Im a sailor all I do is drunk, cuss and make illegitimate kids when Im away from CC
dont sig that
Correct, only the decathlon participants will compete against each other in that part of the meet. Think of the decathlon as it's own "meet within the meet", if you will. Which is why they don't participate in any other events...they've got enough on their plate. <grin>AgentSmith88 wrote:question: Are the decathlon participants doing each event with only each other, or together with the rest of the people for that event? I know they are usually separate in a track meet, but I wasn't sure if you wanted to run it that way.
HighlanderAttack wrote:Here is my team
Team Name: Highlander Legends
HighlanderAttack(captain)
shoop76
shaneback
jricart
olkok
Kritical
I love that name.HighlanderAttack wrote: Team Name: Highlander Legends

Hi BGtheBrain. Please don't take this the wrong way, but I don't typically allow ?'s into my tournaments. This is due to somewhat frequent multi-player involvement but primarily because ?'s tend to not be very committed to showing up.BGtheBrain wrote:Im new, but if anyone needs me on a team, this sounds awesome.
Actually, now that I think about it, it's entirely possible that by the time this tournament starts (I'll probably give it the full 30 day spinup), you may have "proven yourself" in regard to the consistency, so I may have poo-poo'd your participation too soon.BGtheBrain wrote:lol no problem. Maybe next time. I've only played a few games and noticed the same thing about the ?'s

Robinette wrote:Depends on what metric you use...Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
The coolest is squishyg
Us? Disagree? Say it isn't so! <grin>squishyg wrote:as much as woody and i disagree, you can't say the man isn't open-minded!
Awesome, im debating buying the premium membership and should know by then. Ill keep an eye on this thread.Woodruff wrote:Actually, now that I think about it, it's entirely possible that by the time this tournament starts (I'll probably give it the full 30 day spinup), you may have "proven yourself" in regard to the consistency, so I may have poo-poo'd your participation too soon.