Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
colton24 wrote:vote MeDeFe for being a mod
I suppose colton's vote might have been made jokingly, but edocsil, seriously... in a game where it takes only 4 to lynch and there are probably 2 scum it's not a good idea to cast a second vote against someone with such a flimsy reasoning. Care to explain your behaviour? Or should we just lynch you for scummy behaviour?edocsil wrote:vote medefe for doubting the existence of velociraptors. Definitely a werewolf.MeDeFe wrote:A velociraptor? lolwut?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
IF you got hammered, your sacrifice would not be in vain, we would have the scums nuts in a vice. That being said, if someone was dumb enough to put a joke vote (It was an XKCD link, I was joking) to L-1 I would have unvoted.MeDeFe wrote:colton24 wrote:vote MeDeFe for being a modI suppose colton's vote might have been made jokingly, but edocsil, seriously... in a game where it takes only 4 to lynch and there are probably 2 scum it's not a good idea to cast a second vote against someone with such a flimsy reasoning. Care to explain your behaviour? Or should we just lynch you for scummy behaviour?edocsil wrote:vote medefe for doubting the existence of velociraptors. Definitely a werewolf.MeDeFe wrote:A velociraptor? lolwut?
vote edocsil
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Um defensive much? 2 votes really isn't much and unless we had some brain-dead townies, or some stupid scum, you wouldn't be hammered. Anyone that would hammered would pretty much be lynched the next day point blank, so there really isn't anything for you to worry about. However the fact that you did worry shows that your life is very important to you. Usually that is a trait of scum not town. Thusly Vote: MeDeFeMeDeFe wrote:colton24 wrote:vote MeDeFe for being a modI suppose colton's vote might have been made jokingly, but edocsil, seriously... in a game where it takes only 4 to lynch and there are probably 2 scum it's not a good idea to cast a second vote against someone with such a flimsy reasoning. Care to explain your behaviour? Or should we just lynch you for scummy behaviour?edocsil wrote:vote medefe for doubting the existence of velociraptors. Definitely a werewolf.MeDeFe wrote:A velociraptor? lolwut?
vote edocsil
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Woah? You are not banned? where did all the rumors flying from?Victor Sullivan wrote:No replacement needed! Reporting for duty!
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Two out of four is plenty. And why wouldn't my life be important me? Whether I'm scum or town, I want to win, staying alive is very conducive to that end.Fircoal wrote:Um defensive much? 2 votes really isn't much and unless we had some brain-dead townies, or some stupid scum, you wouldn't be hammered. Anyone that would hammered would pretty much be lynched the next day point blank, so there really isn't anything for you to worry about. However the fact that you did worry shows that your life is very important to you. Usually that is a trait of scum not town. Thusly Vote: MeDeFeMeDeFe wrote:colton24 wrote:vote MeDeFe for being a modI suppose colton's vote might have been made jokingly, but edocsil, seriously... in a game where it takes only 4 to lynch and there are probably 2 scum it's not a good idea to cast a second vote against someone with such a flimsy reasoning. Care to explain your behaviour? Or should we just lynch you for scummy behaviour?edocsil wrote:vote medefe for doubting the existence of velociraptors. Definitely a werewolf.MeDeFe wrote:A velociraptor? lolwut?
vote edocsil
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
You don't need to stay alive to win, and it's easier to be town and die and win than for scum to die and win. SCum need to stay alive it's very important. Town doesn't. and two out of four really isn't that many. And you can't tell me that two people aren't going to vote the same person on day 1 as it's gonna happen.MeDeFe wrote:Two out of four is plenty. And why wouldn't my life be important me? Whether I'm scum or town, I want to win, staying alive is very conducive to that end.Fircoal wrote:Um defensive much? 2 votes really isn't much and unless we had some brain-dead townies, or some stupid scum, you wouldn't be hammered. Anyone that would hammered would pretty much be lynched the next day point blank, so there really isn't anything for you to worry about. However the fact that you did worry shows that your life is very important to you. Usually that is a trait of scum not town. Thusly Vote: MeDeFeMeDeFe wrote:colton24 wrote:vote MeDeFe for being a modI suppose colton's vote might have been made jokingly, but edocsil, seriously... in a game where it takes only 4 to lynch and there are probably 2 scum it's not a good idea to cast a second vote against someone with such a flimsy reasoning. Care to explain your behaviour? Or should we just lynch you for scummy behaviour?edocsil wrote:vote medefe for doubting the existence of velociraptors. Definitely a werewolf.MeDeFe wrote:A velociraptor? lolwut?
vote edocsil
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I still haven't sorted out what he did to colton, and how cena was involved... Maybe we should lynch him, just as a precaution you know?Victor Sullivan wrote:Vote Fircoal. Yeah, I went there.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
So... got anything new for us?Fircoal wrote:You don't need to stay alive to win
That doesn't mean I shouldn't defend myself at all, though.and it's easier to be town and die and win than for scum to die and win.
Wait... what!?SCum need to stay alive it's very important. Town doesn't.
It's 50% and L-2, maybe we're operating under different definitions of "too many for being comfortable", but I tell you, your definition sucks.and two out of four really isn't that many.
I honestly have no idea what you're trying to tell me here, nor why you think I said that two people aren't going to vote for the same person on day 1. If you're trying to confuse me with nonsense you're succeeding.And you can't tell me that two people aren't going to vote the same person on day 1 as it's gonna happen.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Are you wanting to push him to L-1? Seems a bit scummy that you're recruiting BWers....Fircoal wrote:What I'm saying is that being defensive at 2 votes on you is very scummy. Considering Day 1 is all random votes there will be times that two people will vote the same person even in such a small game. It's nothing to get really defensive about. The fact that you got so riled up at little makes me think that you have too much of an attachment onto your life. That trait is more common in scum than town.
It seems scummy that I'm trying to make a case on someone who I believe I scum? What game have you been playing?Victor Sullivan wrote:Are you wanting to push him to L-1? Seems a bit scummy that you're recruiting BWers....Fircoal wrote:What I'm saying is that being defensive at 2 votes on you is very scummy. Considering Day 1 is all random votes there will be times that two people will vote the same person even in such a small game. It's nothing to get really defensive about. The fact that you got so riled up at little makes me think that you have too much of an attachment onto your life. That trait is more common in scum than town.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
True, but that's no reason for all town people to sacrifice themselves to the greater good on day 1.Fircoal wrote:You don't need to stay alive to win, and it's easier to be town and die and win than for scum to die and win. SCum need to stay alive it's very important. Town doesn't. and two out of four really isn't that many. And you can't tell me that two people aren't going to vote the same person on day 1 as it's gonna happen.
So your reason for voting for me is that you think I want to stay alive "too much". What solid logic, your powers of reasoning astound me! If I don't defend myself I obviously don't have a defense because I'm scum, if I do defend myself I'm obviously scum because I want to stay alive. You might as well tie stones to me and throw me into a river to see if I float.Fircoal wrote:What I'm saying is that being defensive at 2 votes on you is very scummy. Considering Day 1 is all random votes there will be times that two people will vote the same person even in such a small game. It's nothing to get really defensive about. The fact that you got so riled up at little makes me think that you have too much of an attachment onto your life. That trait is more common in scum than town.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
If you defended yourself from reasonable suspicion, like my votes there is nothing scummy about that. Defending yourself from random votes is really scummy however. Random votes are random, they're gonna go away and unless the town is stupid nothing will come of them.MeDeFe wrote:So your reason for voting for me is that you think I want to stay alive "too much". What solid logic, your powers of reasoning astound me! If I don't defend myself I obviously don't have a defense because I'm scum, if I do defend myself I'm obviously scum because I want to stay alive. You might as well tie stones to me and throw me into a river to see if I float.Fircoal wrote:What I'm saying is that being defensive at 2 votes on you is very scummy. Considering Day 1 is all random votes there will be times that two people will vote the same person even in such a small game. It's nothing to get really defensive about. The fact that you got so riled up at little makes me think that you have too much of an attachment onto your life. That trait is more common in scum than town.
unvote
vote Fircoal
Because you are casting a vote with no good reasoning and no logic whatsoever behind it. Your only claim to my scumminess is that I defend myself more vehemently than you think proper. Well, fuck your ideas of what's proper, I'm going to defend myself as I see fit, not as you and your pre-conceptions would have it.
I knew what image edoc was linking to as soon as I saw "xkcd" in the link. It might have been a real joke or an attempt to start a bandwagon disguised as a joke, as of now, though, you look scummier to me than edoc does.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I'm not saying all town people are going to go out and sacrifice themselves for the greater good.aage wrote:True, but that's no reason for all town people to sacrifice themselves to the greater good on day 1.Fircoal wrote:You don't need to stay alive to win, and it's easier to be town and die and win than for scum to die and win. SCum need to stay alive it's very important. Town doesn't. and two out of four really isn't that many. And you can't tell me that two people aren't going to vote the same person on day 1 as it's gonna happen.
Also, Edocsil is at L-2 as well. Don't hear him complain.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Indeed, L-2 is just two votes away from lynch. That's been my point all along.Fircoal wrote:I'm not saying all town people are going to go out and sacrifice themselves for the greater good.aage wrote:True, but that's no reason for all town people to sacrifice themselves to the greater good on day 1.Fircoal wrote:You don't need to stay alive to win, and it's easier to be town and die and win than for scum to die and win. SCum need to stay alive it's very important. Town doesn't. and two out of four really isn't that many. And you can't tell me that two people aren't going to vote the same person on day 1 as it's gonna happen.
Also, Edocsil is at L-2 as well. Don't hear him complain.
It's a 7 player game, L-2 means nothing. That's just 2 votes. Again it's easy to have 2 votes land on you. I have 2 votes right now. One from Victor which I have no idea why, (could be a random) and one from MeFeDe. It's not until the 3rd comes on where it's really big.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.