New Indochina Map!!!

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:12 pm

i dont like the sea links idea but i will adjust the citys

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:13 pm

spinwizard wrote:i dont like the sea links idea but i will adjust the citys

Ok but call them cities please! :p

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:17 pm

cities

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:25 pm

less cities

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:26 pm

The problem with Indochina, to me, is that the playability is awful. The bottleneck is too exploitable. Maybe you should try and make a new version with better playability. If you can't get permission from the maker anyway, CC could take down the old Indochina and put up a new one.

Probably need some guidance from Andy about this really..

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:30 pm

i think this makes the bottle neck less exploitable

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:32 pm

Ruben Cassar wrote:Limit those cities to 2 or 3 at most. Consider making the bonus applicable if you hold all 3 of them and then make it only a +2 bonus for example. Also consider some sea links...those could add another dimension to the map.

Good luck!

I meant holding 3 cities gives you a +2 unit bonus.

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:33 pm

Guiscard wrote:The problem with Indochina, to me, is that the playability is awful. The bottleneck is too exploitable. Maybe you should try and make a new version with better playability. If you can't get permission from the maker anyway, CC could take down the old Indochina and put up a new one.

Probably need some guidance from Andy about this really..

That's why he should use sea routes and perhaps something similar to the caravan route in your Mongolia map...to compensate for the bottleneck.

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:38 pm

is holding 4=+3 armys ok???

Jack0827 · Post by **Jack0827** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:49 pm

I didn't like the origanals playability but this one is ok. I only wish you could find some way to make more nations(i.e. I finnished a game on this map in five minutes with the person who had the most men neer each other as the winner, no stratigy just luck) if it is still so samll once it is finnished I won't play it. I do like the collers and I don't know about the city bonuses(it could just make the problems with the first one even worse) but it dose look better and I would at least try it out

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:53 pm

Make it a bigger map with more territories, more options, entirely new bonuses, conts, ea routes etc. etc.

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:56 pm

dont play unlimited then?

max is gr8 · Post by **max is gr8** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:01 pm

I prefer the original for both the revamps no offense
I would play them both but I like the original and with the other map If I could possibly choose not to play the revamp I'ld like it

Jack0827 · Post by **Jack0827** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:01 pm

you need to widen the bottel neck by ether using sea roughts, land roughts, or just widdening it by a one or two nations

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:03 pm

i like it as a small map as it gives the maps on the site variation, i added new routes!, this better?

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:12 pm

with the sea routes in i think i need some impassable borders

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:17 pm

I think I'm starting to miss the gameplay of the origional map, I think I'm going to go make 10 or 20 of it so I get my fill.

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:19 pm

i like the old gameplay too but other ppl want it 2 change...

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:20 pm

spinwizard wrote:i like the old gameplay too but other ppl want it 2 change...

Maybe a vote? Between just a graphics facelift vs New Gameplay.

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:22 pm

going up now!

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:25 pm

I want both cause i think laos should b split into 2 and it 2 have bonus cities...but not extra attack routes

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:28 pm

spinwizard wrote:I want both cause i think laos should b split into 2 and it 2 have bonus cities...but not extra attack routes

lol if someone wants extra attack routes on the map I'm working on I am going to say no and beat the stupid out of them.

Molacole · Post by **Molacole** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:56 pm

add thailand?

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:11 pm

i want 2 keep it asclose 2 the original as i can

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:21 pm

the borders still needs work, i see to much white

New Indochina Map!!!

Change graphics or gameplay?