It's not based in America.Jippd wrote:For a website based in America, the freedom of speech and information on this site is severely lacking IMO
Moderator: Community Team
It's not based in America.Jippd wrote:For a website based in America, the freedom of speech and information on this site is severely lacking IMO
yeah, there was stuff going on at the time... another dark period in CC's past, kind of like the one we are going through now with all the issues i will not post/discuss here... however, the clan was unbanned and the sig is still seen from time to time in the forums when a member gets nostalgic...-el Jesus negroJippd wrote:Seems ridiculous and like some mod was on a power hunger trip when they did that. If nobody in the said picture had any complaints about other people using it then conquerclub should not have cared or stepped in.spiesr wrote:The technicality more or less comes down to that each player's signature contained not only a picture of them self, but also of the others clan members. They all had the same picture which contained all of individual pictures.Jippd wrote:I don't see how they violated the rules if they were posting pictures of themselves
For a website based in America, the freedom of speech and information on this site is severely lacking IMO

It was before my time, but my understanding from reading the old thread was that the mod in question had simply run out of patience with the people involved. I'm sure you've seen people fly off the handle when they've been irritated for a long time and just one more little thing, insignificant by itself, pushes them over the edge?Jippd wrote:Seems ridiculous and like some mod was on a power hunger trip when they did that. If nobody in the said picture had any complaints about other people using it then conquerclub should not have cared or stepped in.spiesr wrote:The technicality more or less comes down to that each player's signature contained not only a picture of them self, but also of the others clan members. They all had the same picture which contained all of individual pictures.Jippd wrote:I don't see how they violated the rules if they were posting pictures of themselves
Canada, to be specific, but the legal environment is similar. Cyberstalking and cyberbullying are serious issues that are leading to larger and larger lawsuits. Unless the nature of the website is such that it requires the exchange of personal information, it just makes sense to avoid the liabilities and protect users' anonymity.For a website based in America, the freedom of speech and information on this site is severely lacking IMO
Wait, wait.. back up. Someone got banned for posting a picture of themselves in their signature? That sounds absurd.owenshooter wrote:and when you google that info you get just about everything you could ever want to know about the guy... just sayin... funny how we have gone from banning an entire clan for posting their own personal pics in their clan sig to allowing the posting of names and cities, etc within the forums... just seems to be a real disconnect within the forums about what is and isn't against the rules...-el Jesus negroNight Strike wrote:http://www.pr.com/press-release/381510World’s Foremost Risk Players Named: Conquer Club Produces and Celebrates Top Tournament Risk Players
Westmount, Canada, January 10, 2012 --(PR.com)-- The top spot was claimed by Jacob Lowenstein, aka “jleaux,” of Toledo, OH.
Dukasaur wrote: It was before my time, but my understanding from reading the old thread was that the mod in question had simply run out of patience with the people involved. I'm sure you've seen people fly off the handle when they've been irritated for a long time and just one more little thing, insignificant by itself, pushes them over the edge?
You'll have to ask Owen. I only found that thread last time because he posted the link.TheGeneral2112 wrote:Dukasaur wrote: It was before my time, but my understanding from reading the old thread was that the mod in question had simply run out of patience with the people involved. I'm sure you've seen people fly off the handle when they've been irritated for a long time and just one more little thing, insignificant by itself, pushes them over the edge?
Link?
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... ilit=dagipTheGeneral2112 wrote:Dukasaur wrote: It was before my time, but my understanding from reading the old thread was that the mod in question had simply run out of patience with the people involved. I'm sure you've seen people fly off the handle when they've been irritated for a long time and just one more little thing, insignificant by itself, pushes them over the edge?
Link?

saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
there you go! riddle is solved...-el Jesus negroAndyDufresne wrote:We asked Jleaux if the personal information was alright to include, and he consented.

not the same deal that was being discussed...-el Jesus negroGypsys Kiss wrote:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... ilit=dagip
They were banned for the same offence that owen was protesting about

Hahaha! He even wrote the rules, and he broke them.Dukasaur wrote:The trouble is, the policy as written does not allow any wiggle room:Night Strike wrote:I'm not the one who created the press release. I'm just posting it to share with the community.
Subject: Community Guidelines
(emphasis added)Night Strike wrote:[*]Don't ever post personal information of other users. Anywhere. Ever. Even if they already posted it somewhere else. This includes posting personal information about a CC user on another site, you will be held accountable here.
Owen is right. Posting a user's real name is against the rules, even if it's done with good intentions, even if they give consent, even if there's been a press release. The forum mods ruthlessly edit out the real name of the Conqueror when it pops up, even though it's now common knowlege and there really isn't any chance of putting the genie back in the bottle.
I wouldn't be opposed to changing the rules to allow for stuff like this, but as they presently stand this is not allowed, even with the best intentions. The words "Anywhere. Ever." are rather absolute.
I've been asking that for a long time.BigBallinStalin wrote:Hahaha! He even wrote the rules, and he broke them.Dukasaur wrote:The trouble is, the policy as written does not allow any wiggle room:Night Strike wrote:I'm not the one who created the press release. I'm just posting it to share with the community.
Subject: Community Guidelines
(emphasis added)Night Strike wrote:[*]Don't ever post personal information of other users. Anywhere. Ever. Even if they already posted it somewhere else. This includes posting personal information about a CC user on another site, you will be held accountable here.
Owen is right. Posting a user's real name is against the rules, even if it's done with good intentions, even if they give consent, even if there's been a press release. The forum mods ruthlessly edit out the real name of the Conqueror when it pops up, even though it's now common knowlege and there really isn't any chance of putting the genie back in the bottle.
I wouldn't be opposed to changing the rules to allow for stuff like this, but as they presently stand this is not allowed, even with the best intentions. The words "Anywhere. Ever." are rather absolute.
When does the punishment happen?