It was just what I had in mindsempaispellcheck wrote:
I'm using GIMP, and I think what I'm going to do is redraw the map following natty's GIMP tutorial
Moderator: Cartographers
It was just what I had in mindsempaispellcheck wrote:
I'm using GIMP, and I think what I'm going to do is redraw the map following natty's GIMP tutorial


Code: Select all
sacre-couer paris iconDone.Flapcake wrote:whats easy for every one is that you post the images on the last page aswell as the first
Thank you. I worked hard on this update, and I'm glad to hear that it shows.Flapcake wrote:Now your new updateabout the blurness, much better, its just about gone (hurray
) You got all seperate colors for bonuses now, thats good.
I certainly see an improvement in you map
Of course.That's why it's in the Drafting Room.Flapcake wrote:but you have some things you need to sort out.
I did use a brush - 9 px fuzzy circle at 0.50 scale, as natty suggests in his tutorial. I'll try a smaller brush for my next version and see how it works.Flapcake wrote:The outer border, its very rough and pixilated, did you use a pencil tool ? use a brush ( 3 pix for outerborders) I have my brush for borderlines set with 90% transparency, it gives a softer look. ofcourse it depend on how the image appears (soft vs. hard)
If you think I can skip them, I probably will - that way the XML won't give me as much of a headache with centering and all that. I'll work on the ones for the Métro - maybe use a smaller brush or something. I have to make them larger anyway, so that might help.Flapcake wrote:The armycirkles, same rough and pixilated, I think you can skip the cirkles in the territories and keep the ones for Ligne, but they are also rough and pixilated.
Sure. That's an easy fix.Flapcake wrote:Innerborder from Montmartre/Gare du nord to La villette, delete the littel piece that crosses over![]()
To me, too. I'll fix that.Flapcake wrote:The flag for bagground is much better, the "red" side just seems kind of "pink" to me![]()
Thank you!! And thanks for all the feedback, it really helps.Flapcake wrote:I like your improvements and you are on track for a very nice map, keep it up![]()
Flap

No, I meant on the small scale like on Denmark. If you do have it covering the whole background, then you will need to subdue it so that it is barely visible. Just enough that you can see it, and just enough that it doesn't detract from the playable area.koontz1973 wrote:isaiah40 idea of using the same thing as Flapcake on Denmark should really bring the map to life.Not with the water or on a small scale, but covering the whole of the maps background. (Look at the style)
Look below.sempaispellcheck wrote:Oh! My apologies, isaiah, I misunderstood you. I'll find a better flag.
Why not draw them yourself. That way you do not have copyright to deal with.The images were the best I could find. I'll look some more and find better ones.
Thats right, the text. Some of it can stay and some you will need, but see what can be cut without losing the flavour.I'm assuming you mean the text at the top? Aw, I liked it. I thought it was funny.Oh well. I can cut it.
Did not mean to put words into your mouth. But you are right. A barely there map would be best. Why not something like nattys London with an image as well?isaiah40 wrote:No, I meant on the small scale like on Denmark. If you do have it covering the whole background, then you will need to subdue it so that it is barely visible. Just enough that you can see it, and just enough that it doesn't detract from the playable area.koontz1973 wrote:isaiah40 idea of using the same thing as Flapcake on Denmark should really bring the map to life.Not with the water or on a small scale, but covering the whole of the maps background. (Look at the style)

Because I can't really draw. I could try, but they would be barely recognizable, if at all.koontz1973 wrote:Why not draw them yourself. That way you do not have copyright to deal with.
Meaning reduce the opacity? I can do that.isaiah40 wrote:If you do have it covering the whole background, then you will need to subdue it so that it is barely visible. Just enough that you can see it, and just enough that it doesn't detract from the playable area.
Because it would make the landmark illustrations redundant.koontz1973 wrote:Why not something like nattys London with an image as well?
Yeah, I've cut a lot of it. I put it in because I thought it was funny, but it's not really necessary.happy2seeyou wrote:the wording on the top is hard to pay attention to.
I'll try that in my next update.happy2seeyou wrote:Maybe the flag could be lighter, like the state flags in the "Great Lakes" map (flags are more muted but still seen).
How? Can you be a bit more specific?happy2seeyou wrote:Also, maybe fix the legend on the side a lil.
Thanks!happy2seeyou wrote:Great job so far though
ND with the auto bonus doesn't need to be explained that it is not apart of any other bonus. If you figure out your background flag, you can have the legend without an eyesore of a large white box. Also, you could make their fonts in the legend more bold with the font being the appropriate color of each bonus (Africa, London, Montreal, San Francisco..) OR... have a mini diagram with the bonus numbers large on them (Japan, Kingdom of Denmark, Land and Sea..)sempaispellcheck wrote:How? Can you be a bit more specific?happy2seeyou wrote:Also, maybe fix the legend on the side a lil.
happy2seeyou wrote:ND with the auto bonus doesn't need to be explained that it is not apart of any other bonus.
I did that so that people in the foundry would know, but I guess I can just put that stuff in the first post.happy2seeyou wrote:Do you really have to state what places start as a neutral?
Anything that doesn't really need to be on the map but you want the foundry to know can just be posted in your first post.sempaispellcheck wrote:happy2seeyou wrote:ND with the auto bonus doesn't need to be explained that it is not apart of any other bonus.I did that so that people in the foundry would know, but I guess I can just put that stuff in the first post.happy2seeyou wrote:Do you really have to state what places start as a neutral?
Good suggestions, man. Thank you for those - I should have some fun working on them.