Conquer Club

lancehoch wrote:

Soloman wrote:Another great idea with no comment from admin...

trackersdream wrote:my bad I see that more stats is on the pending list the people have spoke yay

Read the posts before commenting.

i DID BUT THEY DID NOT GO FAR ENOUGH WITH THE STATS SO i POSTED...

risk master2000 wrote:

firth4eva wrote:i agree but shouldnt it be percentage of turns missed

maybe it should be both the # of missed turns and the percentage against all turns taken

IMO a average turns missed per game would be more helpful.

Thezzaruz wrote:

risk master2000 wrote:

firth4eva wrote:i agree but shouldnt it be percentage of turns missed

maybe it should be both the # of missed turns and the percentage against all turns taken

IMO a average turns missed per game would be more helpful.

I disagree, average turns missed per game can be skewed. If i miss one turn in 100 games and each game is 100 turns, and you miss one turn in 100 games but each of your games is 10 turns, then we both have a rate of 0.01 missed turns per game. However I have only missed 1/10,000 turns while you have missed 1/1,000 (10/10,000) turns. I think that the percentage of turns missed or even a percentage of turns missed per game would be better than average missed turns per game.

While I don't the number of rounds per game (as per your example) making that much of a difference I do see your point.
Could have it as a percentage or as an average of turns missed. My big beef was with the idea of using total number of turns missed as it means something.

with the implementation of the new feedback sysytem I feel more detailed stats would make a huge difference things like turns missed percentage, game types played and win loss ratio's broken down by game type, average turn length, average time between abvailable turns, etc... All of this will help people to judge coupled with the new rating system and I am sure I missed a few things but you all get the gist...

I have split off the discussion about IE vs Firefox. To find those posts look here. As AK_iceman stated on the first page of this discussion, this is on the To-Do List.

lancehoch wrote:I have split off the discussion about IE vs Firefox. To find those posts look here. As AK_iceman stated on the first page of this discussion, this is on the To-Do List.

"You are not authorised to read this forum."

Is this my issue or the forum's issue?

antony.trupe wrote:

lancehoch wrote:I have split off the discussion about IE vs Firefox. To find those posts look here. As AK_iceman stated on the first page of this discussion, this is on the To-Do List.

"You are not authorised to read this forum."

Is this my issue or the forum's issue?

Ran into same issue and shot Lancie a pm no response yet...Still I look forward to more built in game stats...

Sorry, I meant to move this into Chatter Box, but I moved it into the Mod equivalent. I am working on getting this restored. Again, my fault, I am sorry.

lancehoch wrote:Sorry, I meant to move this into Chatter Box, but I moved it into the Mod equivalent. I am working on getting this restored. Again, my fault, I am sorry.

any update?

Soloman wrote:

lancehoch wrote:Sorry, I meant to move this into Chatter Box, but I moved it into the Mod equivalent. I am working on getting this restored. Again, my fault, I am sorry.

any update?

Yes, try the link now.

And thanks again lance.

Welcome, and sorry. I needed an admin to fix it, great stuff on the first week.