Conquer Club

What is wrong with a bit of beastality once and a while? You might get some really bad STI's but if it floats your boat..

Skittles! wrote:What is wrong with a bit of beastality once and a while? You might get some really bad STI's but if it floats your boat..

Only if you happen to choose some variety of monkey or great ape for your partner.

Neutrino wrote:

Skittles! wrote:What is wrong with a bit of beastality once and a while? You might get some really bad STI's but if it floats your boat..

Only if you happen to choose some variety of monkey or great ape for your partner.

Shhh... We're primapes, oh shit. Lawl

Neutrino wrote:

Skittles! wrote:What is wrong with a bit of beastality once and a while? You might get some really bad STI's but if it floats your boat..

Only if you happen to choose some variety of monkey or great ape for your partner.

So goats are perfectly safe, then? You don't need a condom or anything like that?

Stopper wrote:

Neutrino wrote:

Skittles! wrote:What is wrong with a bit of beastality once and a while? You might get some really bad STI's but if it floats your boat..

Only if you happen to choose some variety of monkey or great ape for your partner.

So goats are perfectly safe, then? You don't need a condom or anything like that?

What's your favourite type of goat? A mountain goat or what?

I don't know - I wasn't asking for me - I was asking for a friend.

That's what they all say.

jay_a2j wrote:You'd expect to hear this story about some guy in California or Boston but noooooo.

Beastiality and incest are generally associated with southern states, not the more progressive parts of the country like Cali and Boston.

Kid_A wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:You'd expect to hear this story about some guy in California or Boston but noooooo.

Beastiality and incest are generally associated with southern states, not the more progressive parts of the country like Cali and Boston.

The "progressive states" are more likely to have a judge give Rover the dog in marriage to a man. Liberalism at its finest.

jay_a2j wrote:The "progressive states" are more likely to have a judge give Rover the dog in marriage to a man. Liberalism at its finest.

What an odd thing to say. You can't roll your eyes in resigned disgust at "Liberalism" for marrying a dog to a man, when it has never actually happened.

jay_a2j wrote:

Kid_A wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:You'd expect to hear this story about some guy in California or Boston but noooooo.

Beastiality and incest are generally associated with southern states, not the more progressive parts of the country like Cali and Boston.

The "progressive states" are more likely to have a judge give Rover the dog in marriage to a man. Liberalism at its finest.

Look, beastiality, pedophilia, incest, ect. have NOTHING to do with homosexuality. The majority of gays want NOTHING to do with those people. And Liberals don't want to make beastiality, pedophilia, ect. legal for a couple of reasons. I am a hippy. That is as liberal as it gets. I strongly believe in consent. I think that it is the most important thing in sex. Animals, children and dead bodies cannot give consent. So I strongly believe that beastiality, pedophilia and necrophilia should be illegal. All the gay people I know think the same way. Stop catagorizing gays and lesbians with the same group as dog fuckers.

And what if a brother and sister, both adults, want to marry. You start allowing things that were never the "norm" to become the norm you open the flood gates. Then the brother will say,"Hey, if those two guys can marry, why can't I marry my sister? Love is love right? Who are you to say I can't love my sister in an intimate way?"



(continues to stir the pot)

Well that sounds like a very southern thing to do. The south are very conservative, so it sounds like YOU'D be the one allowing such things.

hecter wrote:Well that sounds like a very southern thing to do. The south are very conservative, so it sounds like YOU'D be the one allowing such things.

I'm in NY. Yeah, would be a red state if not for NYC. Conservative judges are exactly that conservative. It is far more likely a liberal judge would allow such things not a conservative.

Again, incest is a very southern and conservative thing.

hecter wrote:Again, incest is a very southern and conservative thing.

Stereotype much?

jay_a2j wrote:

hecter wrote:Again, incest is a very southern and conservative thing.

Stereotype much?

Are you joking? Please tell me you're joking. This is coming from somebody who believes that all gays and liberals are exactly the same.

hecter wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

hecter wrote:Again, incest is a very southern and conservative thing.

Stereotype much?

Are you joking? Please tell me you're joking. This is coming from somebody who believes that all gays and liberals are exactly the same.

I don't think that at all.

Really? Cause that's the vibe you give off in the majority of your posts…

I think liberals and liberals are exactly the same. Believe it or not, there are conservative gays.

Believe it or not, I realize that there are conservative gays. But, liberals are not all the same. Get over yourself.

jay_a2j wrote:

hecter wrote:Well that sounds like a very southern thing to do. The south are very conservative, so it sounds like YOU'D be the one allowing such things.

I'm in NY. Yeah, would be a red state if not for NYC. Conservative judges are exactly that conservative. It is far more likely a liberal judge would allow such things not a conservative.

this is all going "fwoop" over my head

mr. incrediball wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:I'm in NY. Yeah, would be a red state if not for NYC. Conservative judges are exactly that conservative. It is far more likely a liberal judge would allow such things not a conservative.

this is all going "fwoop" over my head

It probably isn't going over your head, mr. incrediball - if the bold statement above strikes you as odd and difficult to get to grips with - that's because it's just plain crazy.

... You guys are basing a "right vs left" argument on some idiot perv who had to marry a goat in a country none of us will probably ever even set foot on, trying to draw comparisons to the US.

...