Page 2 of 27
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:27 am
by falcon
Skittles! wrote:falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Nephilim wrote:jay, you're a jackass. passion of the christ isn't "religion" and brokeback isn't "alternative lifestyles." how old are you? too young to know that the world ain't black and white like you might want it to be.
passion was ultra gory. brokeback won oscars. get over it.
Passion of the Christ was about JESUS (refraining from a life altering insult here). How YOU can say it doesn't fall into a religious category and GAY COWBOYS doesn't fall into alternative lifestyles shows your complete ignorance and the possible revocation of your right to breath!
Cowboys are very much hardly existance anymore. But then again, jesus isn't existance anymore.
So hmm.
Actually, some people think both are very much still in existence.
I know that.
Cowboys aren't as much as they used to be. People are called cowboys cause they live on farms now and wear the stereotypical stuff.
Jesus, oh man, he's got some believers.
Well, more than anyone else on earth anyways
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:28 am
by Skittles!
falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Nephilim wrote:jay, you're a jackass. passion of the christ isn't "religion" and brokeback isn't "alternative lifestyles." how old are you? too young to know that the world ain't black and white like you might want it to be.
passion was ultra gory. brokeback won oscars. get over it.
Passion of the Christ was about JESUS (refraining from a life altering insult here). How YOU can say it doesn't fall into a religious category and GAY COWBOYS doesn't fall into alternative lifestyles shows your complete ignorance and the possible revocation of your right to breath!
Cowboys are very much hardly existance anymore. But then again, jesus isn't existance anymore.
So hmm.
Actually, some people think both are very much still in existence.
I know that.
Cowboys aren't as much as they used to be. People are called cowboys cause they live on farms now and wear the stereotypical stuff.
Jesus, oh man, he's got some believers.
Well, more than anyone else on earth anyways
I think God has more believers.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:29 am
by jay_a2j
Jesus IS God.
God is Jesus.
Separate but the same.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:30 am
by Neutrino
falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:
Yup, that's why they teach religion in schools. Sure, they can teach religions in schools, but not different lifestyles. Yeah, that makes sense.
I'm sure about 1 in 10 children in that class would become homosexual anyway. And yeah, Religion really boosts up your morality, and homosexuality just decreases it.
And you Americans have way to many R rated movies.
There is no religion taught in school, the chances of one in 10 kids becoming homosexual is absurd, sarcasm is a tool for those who have no real arguement so don't use it, and your point about R rated movies is backed up by no proof and comes from a decidedly biased perspective.
Religion is taught in schools and its
Christianity, not religion. If It were religion they would teach others, rather than just the one the state has accepted.
I dont have the actual stastics, but 1:10 dosent seem to extreme to me.
Sarcasm is a good tool for those who don't wish to use unncessilary large amounts of expletives to get their point across and
compared to Australia, America has many, many R rated movies.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:30 am
by falcon
Skittles! wrote:falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:jay_a2j wrote:
Passion of the Christ was about JESUS (refraining from a life altering insult here). How YOU can say it doesn't fall into a religious category and GAY COWBOYS doesn't fall into alternative lifestyles shows your complete ignorance and the possible revocation of your right to breath!
Cowboys are very much hardly existance anymore. But then again, jesus isn't existance anymore.
So hmm.
Actually, some people think both are very much still in existence.
I know that.
Cowboys aren't as much as they used to be. People are called cowboys cause they live on farms now and wear the stereotypical stuff.
Jesus, oh man, he's got some believers.
Well, more than anyone else on earth anyways
I think God has more believers.
According to the majority of Christians on the earth, Jesus is God.
God is also a loose term. Does it refer to Allah, Yahwah, Zeus, Shiva . . .or perhaps all of the above?
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:32 am
by Neutrino
jay_a2j wrote:Jesus IS God.
God is Jesus.
Separate but the same.
I thought the point was the Jesus was God's som, or something along those lines. Dont bale me if its qrong though, I didnt pay any attention during RE.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:33 am
by Skittles!
Yes, that's in your religion.
But with Judaism, they don't believe Jesus was the Messiah, but they believe in Yahweh, who is God.
With Islam, they believe Jesus was a Prophet, but he is still not more highly believed than Allah, who is God.
Christianity, as you know, believes Jesus is God. But the other Abrahamic religions don't.
So add that up, God has more believers than Jesus.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:34 am
by falcon
Neutrino wrote:
Religion is taught in schools and its Christianity, not religion. If It were religion they would teach others, rather than just the one the state has accepted.
I dont have the actual stastics, but 1:10 dosent seem to extreme to me.
Sarcasm is a good tool for those who don't wish to use unncessilary large amounts of expletives to get their point across and
compared to Australia, America has many, many R rated movies.
Please find the statistics
Sarcasm and large amounts of expletives serve the same purpose: to slam an opposing view point with offering an credible response yourself.
Who's to tell which one got it right
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:36 am
by falcon
Neutrino wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Jesus IS God.
God is Jesus.
Separate but the same.
I thought the point was the Jesus was God's som, or something along those lines. Dont bale me if its qrong though, I didnt pay any attention during RE.
The majority of Christians believe that Jesus is God's son and God at the same time
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:37 am
by Skittles!
falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:
Cowboys are very much hardly existance anymore. But then again, jesus isn't existance anymore.
So hmm.
Actually, some people think both are very much still in existence.
I know that.
Cowboys aren't as much as they used to be. People are called cowboys cause they live on farms now and wear the stereotypical stuff.
Jesus, oh man, he's got some believers.
Well, more than anyone else on earth anyways
I think God has more believers.
According to the majority of Christians on the earth, Jesus is God.
God is also a loose term. Does it refer to Allah, Yahwah, Zeus, Shiva . . .or perhaps all of the above?
The Abrahamic one.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:37 am
by jay_a2j
Neutrino wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Jesus IS God.
God is Jesus.
Separate but the same.
I thought the point was the Jesus was God's som, or something along those lines. Dont bale me if its qrong though, I didnt pay any attention during RE.
God has 3 manifestations. God the Father, God the Son (Jesus) and the Holy Spirit. 3 in 1.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:39 am
by falcon
Skittles! wrote:Yes, that's in your religion.
But with Judaism, they don't believe Jesus was the Messiah, but they believe in Yahweh, who is God.
With Islam, they believe Jesus was a Prophet, but he is still not more highly believed than Allah, who is God.
Christianity, as you know, believes Jesus is God. But the other Abrahamic religions don't.
So add that up, God has more believers than Jesus.
Whose to say its my religion? I'm agnostic
Now that you clarify it yes in that sense God does have more believers than Jesus. Though there are others that believe all religions that believe in a supreme power actually believe in the same deity.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:39 am
by Neutrino
falcon wrote:Neutrino wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Jesus IS God.
God is Jesus.
Separate but the same.
I thought the point was the Jesus was God's som, or something along those lines. Dont bale me if its qrong though, I didnt pay any attention during RE.
The majority of Christians believe that Jesus is God's son and God at the same time
Rather contradictory, dont you think?
Or does God have the holy power of contradictorialness?
I also notice that His almighty powers allow him to trancent the normal grammatical laws.
Ok, ill stop now.

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:41 am
by Skittles!
falcon wrote:Skittles! wrote:Yes, that's in your religion.
But with Judaism, they don't believe Jesus was the Messiah, but they believe in Yahweh, who is God.
With Islam, they believe Jesus was a Prophet, but he is still not more highly believed than Allah, who is God.
Christianity, as you know, believes Jesus is God. But the other Abrahamic religions don't.
So add that up, God has more believers than Jesus.
Whose to say its my religion? I'm agnostic
Now that you clarify it yes in that sense God does have more believers than Jesus. Though there are others that believe all religions that believe in a supreme power actually believe in the same deity.
I was originally talking to Jay.
And I know that, I used to be one of those people
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:43 am
by jay_a2j
Neutrino wrote:
Rather contradictory, dont you think?
No, not at all.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:45 am
by falcon
Neutrino wrote:
Rather contradictory, dont you think?
Or does God have the holy power of contradictorialness?
I also notice that His almighty powers allow him to trancent the normal grammatical laws.
Ok, ill stop now.

The concept of the Holy Trinity is one of the reasons I am agnostic. Yes, it is contradictory at first sight but the concept does make sense from the point of view of Christian Theology. And technically God would have the power of contradictorialness since he is believed to be omnipotent and would also allow him to transcend grammatical law
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 am
by Skittles!
Is contridictorialness even a word?
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 am
by Neutrino
jay_a2j wrote:Neutrino wrote:
Rather contradictory, dont you think?
No, not at all.
Its like saying I am myself
and my own father. Aside from making me rather inbred, that is tehnically impossible.
Anyway; back on topic. Why is Christianity allowed, when Brokeback Mountain is not?
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:48 am
by Skittles!
Neutrino wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Neutrino wrote:
Rather contradictory, dont you think?
No, not at all.
Its like saying I am myself
and my own father. Aside from making me rather inbred, that is tehnically impossible.
Anyway; back on topic. Why is Christianity allowed, when Brokeback Mountain is not?
Because, obviously, it has homosexuals in it and you do know homosexuals are the devil themself.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:49 am
by luns101
jay_a2j wrote:Where is religion taught in school?
Uh Jay, in just about every public school Biology classroom in America.

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:49 am
by falcon
Here is the problem.
Jay who started this thread has little to no idea who to defend his point of view or religion which essentially set up everyone who enjoys bashing religion up for a slaughter.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:49 am
by Neutrino
Skittles! wrote:Is contridictorialness even a word?
It is now. I have a patent on it [size=0](patent pending, patent pending, patent pending)[/size]
You owe me $20 for its use.

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:50 am
by Skittles!
Neutrino wrote:Skittles! wrote:Is contridictorialness even a word?
It is now. I have a patent on it [size=0](patent pending, patent pending, patent pending)[/size]
You owe me $20 for its use.

Does that mean with that $20 you pay for my premium?
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:50 am
by Neutrino
falcon wrote:Here is the problem.
Jay who started this thread has little to no idea who to defend his point of view or religion which essentially set up everyone who enjoys bashing religion up for a slaughter.
I would have to agree. I usually stear clear of religious debates, but the sheer insanity of this claim made me pounce.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:51 am
by Neutrino
Skittles! wrote:Neutrino wrote:Skittles! wrote:Is contridictorialness even a word?
It is now. I have a patent on it [size=0](patent pending, patent pending, patent pending)[/size]
You owe me $20 for its use.

Does that mean with that $20 you pay for my premium?
Or I pay for a game. Whichever I feal like at the time.
Of course, it would be much easier for you to just buy your own Premium...