Moderator: Community Team
He does. All the time there are little tweaks and fixes. Big projects he no longer has time for, but he tries to squeeze in little fixes all the time. His first year he actually did try to work on CC full time, and there were tons of changes then, but it didn't arrest the site's decline and at some point he obviously had to give it up and go get a real job.xroads wrote:If it is his baby, why doesnt he try to fix things?TeeGee wrote:xroads wrote:So $60,000 max revenue right now if he is lucky.
I guess we are lucky that wham does not rely on CC for income then.
CC is his baby, It is a long way from being euthanized while we still have a group of hardcore players and some blow ins, some who stay for a while and others who come and go.
Does he really care? Or is he just stubborn and doesn't want to admit he was wrong about anything?Dukasaur wrote:He does. All the time there are little tweaks and fixes. Big projects he no longer has time for, but he tries to squeeze in little fixes all the time. His first year he actually did try to work on CC full time, and there were tons of changes then, but it didn't arrest the site's decline and at some point he obviously had to give it up and go get a real job.xroads wrote:If it is his baby, why doesnt he try to fix things?TeeGee wrote:xroads wrote:So $60,000 max revenue right now if he is lucky.
I guess we are lucky that wham does not rely on CC for income then.
CC is his baby, It is a long way from being euthanized while we still have a group of hardcore players and some blow ins, some who stay for a while and others who come and go.
Actually, it was his baby.iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm fairly certain the street corner shit aint his idea.

xroads wrote:2. 95% of CC wants a family friendly site but insists on allowing non friendly content, now in the street corner "his idea"
There is wide support for this within the mod group. While Wham could choose to do something about it and hasn’t, he isn’t the only one that supports it.iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm fairly certain the street corner shit aint his idea.

But who's the actual driving force behind it?xroads wrote:Actually, it was his baby.iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm fairly certain the street corner shit aint his idea.

riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.


I don't know where you're getting your numbers. I looked into this about five years ago because I was curious and got an estimate of $700/month. I'm not going to waste that much time again, but just a very quick Google of "how much for a co-locational server" yields an answer of something between $200 and $700.iAmCaffeine wrote:There is no way the site doesn't run at a profit. Servers are not expensive and it's evident we're not running on high quality ones. It could even be a shared server which costs an irrelevant amount it's so small. If the servers for CC cost more than £50/month I'd be shocked. The only thing to consider is how much KA gets paid and how many hours bW puts into the site himself.
blake and I were. We had a crusade to bring back flame wars. Instead of flame wars a whole bunch of other things have been tried. Now I don't care anymore and blake stabbed me in the heart.iAmCaffeine wrote:But who's the actual driving force behind it?xroads wrote:Actually, it was his baby.iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm fairly certain the street corner shit aint his idea.
All seems pointless now anyway. Since calling people out and racism isn't allowed the place is dead. I don't understand what it offers more than off topics.
But you're terrible at flaming people.DoomYoshi wrote:blake and I were. We had a crusade to bring back flame wars. Instead of flame wars a whole bunch of other things have been tried. Now I don't care anymore and blake stabbed me in the heart.iAmCaffeine wrote:But who's the actual driving force behind it?xroads wrote:Actually, it was his baby.iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm fairly certain the street corner shit aint his idea.
All seems pointless now anyway. Since calling people out and racism isn't allowed the place is dead. I don't understand what it offers more than off topics.
I get my numbers from the profession I work in 5 days a week selling website design and hosting. We handle much more intensive and demanding sites than CC has ever been. If you pay that much you’re getting ripped off and have no idea on how to negotiate a deal.Dukasaur wrote:I don't know where you're getting your numbers. I looked into this about five years ago because I was curious and got an estimate of $700/month. I'm not going to waste that much time again, but just a very quick Google of "how much for a co-locational server" yields an answer of something between $200 and $700.iAmCaffeine wrote:There is no way the site doesn't run at a profit. Servers are not expensive and it's evident we're not running on high quality ones. It could even be a shared server which costs an irrelevant amount it's so small. If the servers for CC cost more than £50/month I'd be shocked. The only thing to consider is how much KA gets paid and how many hours bW puts into the site himself.
https://www.optimalnetworks.com/2015/01 ... olocation/
That's just for the space and the monitoring, not counting the actual cost of the hardware.



Theoretically anything is possible if wham was willing. A precious site I’m on that exact scenario happened. Owner abandoned site, community formed for a business partnership and pooled money (to buy shares / raise the money necessary) to purchase the site.Conde180711 wrote:would it be theoretically possible for members to buy him out then run site themselves? might be really stupid, no idea, just a thought

You guys went ahead and bought that midget snuff porn site?IcePack wrote:Theoretically anything is possible if wham was willing. A precious site I’m on that exact scenario happened. Owner abandoned site, community formed for a business partnership and pooled money (to buy shares / raise the money necessary) to purchase the site.Conde180711 wrote:would it be theoretically possible for members to buy him out then run site themselves? might be really stupid, no idea, just a thought
Pro and cons to this approach, but it’s possible.

Turned out to be a good investment, you’ve spent so much $ there the least few months I’ll be paid back in no timemookiemcgee wrote:You guys went ahead and bought that midget snuff porn site?IcePack wrote:Theoretically anything is possible if wham was willing. A precious site I’m on that exact scenario happened. Owner abandoned site, community formed for a business partnership and pooled money (to buy shares / raise the money necessary) to purchase the site.Conde180711 wrote:would it be theoretically possible for members to buy him out then run site themselves? might be really stupid, no idea, just a thought
Pro and cons to this approach, but it’s possible.


We have a new flaw on bigWham, bad negotiator. I'm waiting on ElJefe's response to my questions and I'll keep you posted.iAmCaffeine wrote:I get my numbers from the profession I work in 5 days a week selling website design and hosting. We handle much more intensive and demanding sites than CC has ever been. If you pay that much you’re getting ripped off and have no idea on how to negotiate a deal.Dukasaur wrote:I don't know where you're getting your numbers. I looked into this about five years ago because I was curious and got an estimate of $700/month. I'm not going to waste that much time again, but just a very quick Google of "how much for a co-locational server" yields an answer of something between $200 and $700.iAmCaffeine wrote:There is no way the site doesn't run at a profit. Servers are not expensive and it's evident we're not running on high quality ones. It could even be a shared server which costs an irrelevant amount it's so small. If the servers for CC cost more than £50/month I'd be shocked. The only thing to consider is how much KA gets paid and how many hours bW puts into the site himself.
https://www.optimalnetworks.com/2015/01 ... olocation/
That's just for the space and the monitoring, not counting the actual cost of the hardware.
Well yeah, ever since you guys started accepting bitcoin for personalized videos I'm like a kid in a umpa lumpa candy store on that site!IcePack wrote:Turned out to be a good investment, you’ve spent so much $ there the least few months I’ll be paid back in no timemookiemcgee wrote:You guys went ahead and bought that midget snuff porn site?IcePack wrote:Theoretically anything is possible if wham was willing. A precious site I’m on that exact scenario happened. Owner abandoned site, community formed for a business partnership and pooled money (to buy shares / raise the money necessary) to purchase the site.Conde180711 wrote:would it be theoretically possible for members to buy him out then run site themselves? might be really stupid, no idea, just a thought
Pro and cons to this approach, but it’s possible.
Last time I owned a website was 1997, so I'm not paying anything.iAmCaffeine wrote:I get my numbers from the profession I work in 5 days a week selling website design and hosting. We handle much more intensive and demanding sites than CC has ever been. If you pay that much you’re getting ripped off and have no idea on how to negotiate a deal.Dukasaur wrote:I don't know where you're getting your numbers. I looked into this about five years ago because I was curious and got an estimate of $700/month. I'm not going to waste that much time again, but just a very quick Google of "how much for a co-locational server" yields an answer of something between $200 and $700.iAmCaffeine wrote:There is no way the site doesn't run at a profit. Servers are not expensive and it's evident we're not running on high quality ones. It could even be a shared server which costs an irrelevant amount it's so small. If the servers for CC cost more than £50/month I'd be shocked. The only thing to consider is how much KA gets paid and how many hours bW puts into the site himself.
https://www.optimalnetworks.com/2015/01 ... olocation/
That's just for the space and the monitoring, not counting the actual cost of the hardware.
Bruceswar was a sports journalist last I was aware so unless he took a different career path I'm not sure what you're talking about.Dukasaur wrote:Last time I owned a website was 1997, so I'm not paying anything.iAmCaffeine wrote:I get my numbers from the profession I work in 5 days a week selling website design and hosting. We handle much more intensive and demanding sites than CC has ever been. If you pay that much you’re getting ripped off and have no idea on how to negotiate a deal.Dukasaur wrote:I don't know where you're getting your numbers. I looked into this about five years ago because I was curious and got an estimate of $700/month. I'm not going to waste that much time again, but just a very quick Google of "how much for a co-locational server" yields an answer of something between $200 and $700.iAmCaffeine wrote:There is no way the site doesn't run at a profit. Servers are not expensive and it's evident we're not running on high quality ones. It could even be a shared server which costs an irrelevant amount it's so small. If the servers for CC cost more than £50/month I'd be shocked. The only thing to consider is how much KA gets paid and how many hours bW puts into the site himself.
https://www.optimalnetworks.com/2015/01 ... olocation/
That's just for the space and the monitoring, not counting the actual cost of the hardware.
I'm just reporting what I found when I went and looked at quotes out of curiosity.
This time I just went and posted the first article I came across on a quick google, but last time this subject was discussed in the forums (maybe five years ago) I spent a bit more time and did a bit more thorough investigation and that's what I found. Bruceswar, who does work in the industry and knows quite a bit more about it than I do, said something similar.
Maybe you're underestimating how big and complex CC really is.
