The Cover-up Is Exposed!

[Pack Rat]

only cover up is what the commie dems have done, so much, ot enough web space to post it all just from joe biden

Please post all these felonies that the Biden Crime Family has committed. I'm sure The Trump Crime Family would appreciate all these secrets you can provide them with.

[jusplay4fun]

AI Overview

Sentence: On January 10, 2025, Judge Juan Merchan sentenced Trump to an unconditional discharge, meaning he faced no fines, jail time, or probationreported by CBS News.
Appeal: Trump has vowed to appeal the conviction.
Manhattan District Attorney's Office
Manhattan District Attorney's Office

This is totally irrelevant, as is MUCH of what pack rat posts, and usually, incessantly and redundantly.

+4,321
What does pack rat TOTALLY IGNORE? please see above

I will not even get into the fact that Bragg used what is essentially a bookkeeping error into 34 felonies. Did the American people, the ULTIMATE Court of Public Opinion, BELIEVE that these were indeed TRUMPED up charges against Trump? Whom did they elect as President in 2024 after this decision?

pack rat, you again TOTALLY ignore the EVIDENCE and do not see the BIG PICTURE. Please add MYOPIC to the list of adjectives of those that apply to the self-loathing rat.

What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict
By Stefan Becket
Updated on: June 3, 2024

Former President Donald Trump's conviction in New York stemmed from a $130,000 "hush money" payment his attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the days before the 2016 election. Prosecutors said the deal was meant to keep voters in the dark about Daniels' allegation that she had sex with Trump years earlier, which he denies.

But the actual charges that Trump faced were far less salacious, and dealt with the comparatively mundane paperwork that was generated when he reimbursed Cohen for the payment.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-char ... y-verdict/

[Dukasaur]

Former President Donald Trump's conviction in New York stemmed from a $130,000 "hush money" payment his attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the days before the 2016 election. Prosecutors said the deal was meant to keep voters in the dark about Daniels' allegation that she had sex with Trump years earlier, which he denies.

But the actual charges that Trump faced were far less salacious, and dealt with the comparatively mundane paperwork that was generated when he reimbursed Cohen for the payment.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-char ... y-verdict/

The fact that you dismiss this as trivial shows how much latitude you are willing to give Trump.

Can you imagine the absolute horror that would have overtaken the nation if Eisenhower (for instance) had been convicted of paying hush money to a whore that he was banging while his wife was at home with their newborn baby? Or Roosevelt, or Ford, or Bush? But Donny does it, and you shrug it off with a casual "yeah, just Donny being Donny".

[jusplay4fun]

Former President Donald Trump's conviction in New York stemmed from a $130,000 "hush money" payment his attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the days before the 2016 election. Prosecutors said the deal was meant to keep voters in the dark about Daniels' allegation that she had sex with Trump years earlier, which he denies.

But the actual charges that Trump faced were far less salacious, and dealt with the comparatively mundane paperwork that was generated when he reimbursed Cohen for the payment.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-char ... y-verdict/

The fact that you dismiss this as trivial shows how much latitude you are willing to give Trump.

Can you imagine the absolute horror that would have overtaken the nation if Eisenhower (for instance) had been convicted of paying hush money to a whore that he was banging while his wife was at home with their newborn baby? Or Roosevelt, or Ford, or Bush? But Donny does it, and you shrug it off with a casual "yeah, just Donny being Donny".

Different Times, Duk. At one time, being divorced got you OUT as a politician. Trump is 2X divorced; Reagan 1X.

I have said, in 2016, that I did not like Trump and felt his personal life was NOT GOOD, and not worthy of my vote. BUT Trump is better than:
1) Biden
2) Kamala, and
3) Hillary.

I found Trump only a bit better than Hillary in 2016. He is MUCH better than Biden or Kamala, when those were my only TWO viable choices. And, for the record, I already said I wanted Marco Rubio for POTUS in 2016 and voted so in the VA Primary. BUT Trump had it (the Republican nomination) basically "sewn up" and DONE by then, Super Tuesday in 2016.

[Pack Rat]

Marco lost his back bone.

[jusplay4fun]

Marco lost his back bone.

There are many cover-ups NOW exposed here:

1) that pack rat posts silly videos THAT almost NO ONE watches; (I challenge pack rat to produce evidence that more than ONE person actually commente on more than 4 of your worthless videos.)

2) that the puny brain that our resident rat had is NOW LOST;

3) that pack rat continues to use innuendo, obfuscation, Fake News, False Narratives, and absolute LIES about Trump, and me, and others who support Trump and his policies;

4) that pack rat continues to use adhominem attacks and impotent insults about me and President Trump;

5) that pack rat suffers from TDS;

6) that pack rat CONTINUES to start new Forum threads that nearly everyone ignores; many have NOT ONE response, perhaps other than himself.

a) Champion of Coal Award goes to?
by Pack Rat » Thu Feb 12, 2026 2:20 pm
0Replies155Views
Last postby Pack Rat ; Thu Feb 12, 2026 2:20 pm

b) Melania New Hit Movie!
by Pack Rat » Tue Feb 24, 2026 8:08 am
0Replies83Views
Last postby Pack Rat ; Tue Feb 24, 2026 8:08 am

c) The most exciting NFL game this year!
by Pack Rat » Sun Dec 21, 2025 1:53 pm
0Replies323Views
Last postby Pack Rat ; Sun Dec 21, 2025 1:53 pm

NOTE the contrast here:
American Football
by DirtyDishSoap » Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:30 pm …
204Replies 65703Views
Last postby jusplay4fun
Sun Jan 25, 2026 11:38 pm

d) Another Church shooting.
by Pack Rat » Sun Sep 28, 2025 1:20 pm
0Replies711Views
Last postby Pack Rat ; Sun Sep 28, 2025 1:20 pm

And here is ONE where pack rat talks to himself in a QUAD Post; where is The Llama to keep tabs on such silliness?

e) Trump's War On Democratic Cities, Political Opposition
by Pack Rat » Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:04 am
3Replies 717Views
Last postby Pack Rat
Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:27 pm

Note that some or even many VIEW such threads, but NO one bothers to REPLY since the post is quite WORTHLESS, as is MUCH of what pack rat says or posts or re-posts, INCLUDING his silly videos that he THINKS and HOPES is "proof" of anything.
REE-dic-a-lous

And for those I insult pack rat, I will say that I offer ACTUAL Proof of what I suggest; pack rat continues to be the IDIOT and repeatedly and incessantly does the SAME THING, again, and again, and AGAIN, and again, and MORE of the SAME.

Who said

Did Einstein say, 'Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results'?
Online users have for years — "over and over again" — shared the quote with the famous physicist's name and image.

[Pack Rat]

Seriously my little pedo-protector, you put too much retribution and hate into your reply to others.

Really my little lost in space, your posts all become a blur of gibberish.

For your listening pleasure of a song that could've and should've been written by you.

[jusplay4fun]

Not one DENIAL by our resident pet rat. His previous post, that is NOT worth quoting, COGENTLY and lucidly demonstrates:

1) that pack rat cannot deny any of my statements;

2) how feeble and impotent are his ideas, arguments, "rebuttals" and "analysis;

3) that he is BAD at having an intelligent and coherent discussion using logic and actual evidence;

4) AND that insults and LIES do not carry the day in this Court of Public CC Opinion.

5) Also NOTE that pack rat CANNOT deny his 5 worthless posts with ZERO replies and his other worthless ideas, posts, or videos.

[Pack Rat]

I find it quite queer of your support to bury the Trump-Epstein Files and call it a day. Hmmm, I suppose since you are anonymous here, that you are safe from being discovered as a pedo-protector. That you don't fukkking care about the thousands of young women and girls who were traffic through a sex ring controlled and used by the rich and powerful.

I will never debate a petty little guy like yourself. A guy like yourself in real life would never let anyone around you know of your views on the Trump-Epstein Files. Can you just imagine the looks and disdain you would receive from the parents of the kids in Sunday School or for that matter your pastor and fellow church goers.

Your stance on the Epstein Files, puts you in the very small minority and for good reason.

AI Overview

+8
Recent polling (as of February 2026) regarding the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein indicates widespread public distrust, a strong desire for full disclosure, and significant dissatisfaction with the federal government's handling of the files.
Key findings from 2026 Reuters/Ipsos, CNN/SSRS, and Economist/YouGov polling include:
Low Satisfaction with Release: Only 6% of Americans are satisfied with the amount of information the government has released, with the Department of Justice having disclosed less than 1% of the total, according to January 2026 polling.
High Desire for Disclosure: About 81% to 89% of Americans support the full release of all Epstein-related documents.
Trust in Leadership Lowered: 69% of Americans agree that the files demonstrate that powerful people in the U.S. are rarely held accountable for their actions. Furthermore, 53% say the files have lowered their trust in political and business leaders.
Skepticism of Cover-up: A significant portion of the public suspects the government is withholding information, with many believing that high-profile individuals are being protected.
Partisan Views on Handling: While there is bipartisan agreement on releasing the files, there is a split on the performance of the current administration. A majority of Democrats and independents disapprove of the handling of the files, while Republicans are more divided, with many expressing uncertainty.
Quinnipiac University Poll
Quinnipiac University Poll
+7
Key Trends:
The polls show that interest in the case remains high, with a majority of the public believing the documents contain embarrassing information about prominent figures across the political spectrum. The issue has continued to act as a significant point of scrutiny, with many Americans feeling that the system is covering up or failing to hold individuals accountable.
The Washington Post
The Washington Post
+2

[jusplay4fun]

And pack rat cannot deny the FACTS that I post and he attempts to offer a refutation that is again impotent. What a sad and self-loathing puny rat you are. And you continue with your FALSE ad hominem attacks. PITIFUL.

The reason you do not debate me is because you are so BAD at it. The reasons you give are simply your attempt to offer a cover-up that amounts to a fig leaf over your more than ample midsection; totally ineffective. And now you offer an AI summary of polls? More worthless stuff disguised to offer something substantial.

Also, you will not refute this FACT:

Re: Epstein Client List
Post by SoN!c » Wed Mar 04, 2026 3:06 pm

It's the democrats Epstein files and that british prince. Even Bill Clinton said under oath that Trump is not involved..

I was about to post this fact, but someone else did so before I did. And you will not debate him NOR refute this.

Admit it, pack rat, you are really bad at this. pack rat = LOSER

You're pathetic, pack rat. Every post you make adds more evidence of your pitiful and self-loathing nature.

[Pack Rat]

Calm down Karen