d.gishman wrote:apparently 3 different colors mean homosexual now
There was a purple one somewhere.
Thats all of them. Aint no purple, aint no gays.
So, you are saying that if someone has a purple banner, you would automatically classify them as gay?
Sad.
-X
Xen is right, besides there isnt a purple one there and those were the only 4 colours supplied so unless someone made an extra purple one by themselves there won't be a purple one.
I rather like my color choices. Red for the blood of Christ. Pink for the dawn of the third day. If it makes me unmanly or even makes me seem homosexual, I'm alright with that. God knows how manly (or not) I am, and I've known some really great people who happened to be homosexual. I don't see anything wrong with being counted among them.
Mine's kinda purple. And everyone knows that all we do in the JF forum is have gay Christian cyber-orgies.
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
d.gishman wrote:apparently 3 different colors mean homosexual now
well that would make the amreican flag gay. it has 3 colors. or the union jack or the french thing. the only one that wouldn't be gay is the old russian flag, china and n. korea they only have two colors.
It is gay, who else would figure to put stars on stripes? Shit, all it needs then is some sequins.
It's far too fabulous to be straight.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
We could have "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" come in and give the JFs and their banner a gay overhaul. The present ones are really loud and obnoxious.
b.k. barunt wrote:The present ones are really loud and obnoxious.
You know you care too much about forum life when you can hear someone's signature.
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
