Conquer Club

All of the 'serious' gaming clans are closed anyway, so isn't this question fairly moot???

hwhrhett wrote:if you dont like the rule then join one of the clans that doesnt have it.

No, join several of the ones that don't have it.

Also, I voted yes, as I'm in CWC, RS and PC at the same time with no divided loyalty problems.

So what do you do if one of your clans challenges the other?

sangfroid wrote:All of the 'serious' gaming clans are closed anyway, so isn't this question fairly moot???

what are you talking about? i was getting invites every day from all the clans, and it has now evolved into a bidding war with the top offer being a 3 year paid premium account if i join a certain clan and bring all my "owen-ness super funk" to their roster. maybe all the good clans are closed to you, but not to me!-0

I voted no... I think being dedicated to a clan is another... all these smaller groups like the spelling nazi's etc are fine to be in several.. but as for clans go I think its important to just be with 1.

Genghis Khan CA wrote:So what do you do if one of your clans challenges the other?

Either abstain from playing, or pick the side of my preferred clan (either because I like them more, or because of the game type required).

The1exile wrote:Either abstain from playing, or pick the side of my preferred clan (either because I like them more, or because of the game type required).

And you don't think that's divided loyalties? Either you can't represent your clan in a challenge, or you're saying that you like one clan more than the others. No offence but I would have thought any self-respecting clan would kick out someone who had them as their number 2 choice.

I didn't say I didn't have divided loyalties, I said I had no problems with it (yet, at least).

Honestly, the so-called self respecting clans won't have me as a member, and I don't really care too much - I get to play more clan challenges (since chances are they won't conflict), play with a more diverse spread of good players, and have a wider range of interesting conversations.

soundout9 wrote:

Peaceful Warrior wrote:I believe in loyalty

and in how many clans are you in sound?

The1exile wrote:I didn't say I didn't have divided loyalties, I said I had no problems with it (yet, at least).

Honestly, the so-called self respecting clans won't have me as a member, and I don't really care too much - I get to play more clan challenges (since chances are they won't conflict), play with a more diverse spread of good players, and have a wider range of interesting conversations.

Ok fair enough, if it works for you and your clan then alls well and good

I am in one competitive clan but I am in a number of non competitive usergroups that will never be doing battle with anyone especially The Untouchables. This list may be of interest to those partaking in this debate - it shows which clans are competitive and which are not, I am still waiting to hear from some what their competitive / non competitive status is.


Competitive Clans / Usergroups:
The Untouchables
Pleasant Chaps
Generation One
Next-Gen Gamers
American Dominators
Grammar and Spelling Nazis
Team Bewbiez
In Cust we Trust
The Army of Darkness
Region of Risk Fans
Gladiators of Sport
esoog a si !selttikS
Monty Python Fan Club
Pikachu ???
18 and under clan
Feckanity
THOTA
Imperial Dragoons
Legion of the Damaned
Legends of War
Mythology
Bounty Hunters
Bushwhackers
Murder Inc.
Gridiron Gang
Rose Duelists
Jesus Freaks ???
Team Bewbiez
The Warlords of the Wort



Non Competitive Clans / Usergroups:
Tournament Organisers
Ball Busterz
CC mafioso
Jesus Freaks ???
Council of Usergroup Leaders
An Animinated Description of Mr. Map (AADOMM)
Poker Stars
Pikachu ???
Digital Artists
Flying Monkeys
Advisory Panel
Chatters
Re-Writers
Cartos
Hunters
Mod Squad
UN
Tournament Directors

This list will be updated once the following clans indicate their competitive status:


Anime Discussion Group
Churchill War Cabinet
De Veroveraars der Lage Landen
Elmo's War Legion
HUB
Least I could Do
Legacy
Smash Brothers
Knights of Empire
SoB
Spamalot
Stachewackers
The Commandos
The Hell-Raising Eyeless Angels of Death
The Knights Crusader Guild
The Legionnaires of Chaos
The Merovingians
The New Gamers
The Old-School Forumites
Trouts
Veteran's Forum
xiGAMES
Other hidden clans / usergroups that I am missing

Genghis Khan CA wrote:

The1exile wrote:Either abstain from playing, or pick the side of my preferred clan (either because I like them more, or because of the game type required).

And you don't think that's divided loyalties? Either you can't represent your clan in a challenge, or you're saying that you like one clan more than the others. No offence but I would have thought any self-respecting clan would kick out someone who had them as their number 2 choice.

i`m in 2 of exiles clans/firms, if we fight for The Pleasant Chaps alls good, if we fight for the CWC that`s fine too. if 1 clan is against the other so be it will depend on what game i`m in. not really arsed about anyone else winning as long as i win my game.



to rebelman,Gladiators of Sport are more or less dead for the second time. i`ve been in them since the start, a founder member, but alas it has died again.

um, isn't most of the clan loyalties points moot, since we don't have a clan ranking system yet?

NO! you need to stay loyal to your clan man!

Hey, Rebelman, no one has seen Greecepwns in quite awhile, and I have no idea what is going on with him, as he is the leader of the Anime Disscussion Group. But I seriously doubt we will be a competitive group.

As for the Pikachu Clan, we are currently deciding on it. Though at the moment, we are more of a disscusion group. For Spamalot, you'll need to see hecter about that one, though we are currently deciding it.

yes, the one clan rule does suck. A LOT! A clan shouldn't prevent their members from joining other clans. I won't care if they choose to fight for another clan in a clan war.

I personally think it's stupid. To fight for only one clan I can understand but to have to leave other clans I don't