Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:13 am**

I agree with Premio, I really like this map for the new Eight player better then the old Classic and It also makes it so that Austarlia isn't a place you can cower in for half the game.

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:23 am**

votes are still split...

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:55 am**

None of the options suited my thinking - so I didn't vote.

C.

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:46 pm**

what is your opinion?

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:23 pm**

Kap, i think that you should add more than one terit for each continent. Also, africa doesnt have any new ones (unless i missed something). Maybe in africa you could add ethiopia, in SA you could add paraguay/uruguay, in asia you could add korea, in europe, you could split up scandinavia. thats all i can think of, but yoou should look up more countries to add to this map, and maybe people will enjoy this map much more.

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:35 pm**

What about New Zealand?

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:41 pm**

Unit_2 wrote:What about New Zealand?

he has already sayed why he would not put new zealand

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:52 pm**

oki-wotsit doesn't exist: google finds only gaming sites. if u use this name, then it'll be obvious that u copied it from someone else's game.

ian.

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:59 pm**

I just took the suggestion, ill change it

. Also thefatty: ill probably add those too.

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:23 pm**

What if i did something more like Feudal War? Changes the gameplay, and makes a different map. Would need a lot of neutrals tho.

oh yea, i would have to change the name to "War!"

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:25 pm**

NEW ZEALAND!!!!!

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:35 pm**

er... not much different... either do that and scratch continent bonuses and add a few other things, or none of that

Posted: **Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:11 pm**

Unit_2 wrote:NEW ZEALAND!!!!!

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:08 am**

Kaplowitz wrote:What if i did something more like Feudal War? Changes the gameplay, and makes a different map. Would need a lot of neutrals tho.

oh yea, i would have to change the name to "War!"

I got somethings also, why Warsaw not London? Why NYC not Washington D.C?Why Banglor not Delhi? Why Riverland not Sydney?

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:15 am**

Unit_2 wrote:I got somethings also, why Warsaw not London? Why NYC not Washington D.C?Why Banglor not Delhi? Why Riverland not Sydney?

Because those are traditional seats of government, and government is dead?

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:26 am**

looks like a fun map, not a fan of the whole classic 2.0 name though

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:36 am**

Unit_2 wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:What if i did something more like Feudal War? Changes the gameplay, and makes a different map. Would need a lot of neutrals tho.

oh yea, i would have to change the name to "War!"

I got somethings also, why Warsaw not London? Why NYC not Washington D.C?Why Banglor not Delhi? Why Riverland not Sydney?

simplest answer: cause he doesnt have new zealand on the map

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:29 pm**

bryguy wrote:
Unit_2 wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:What if i did something more like Feudal War? Changes the gameplay, and makes a different map. Would need a lot of neutrals tho.

oh yea, i would have to change the name to "War!"

I got somethings also, why Warsaw not London? Why NYC not Washington D.C?Why Banglor not Delhi? Why Riverland not Sydney?

simplest answer: cause he doesnt have new zealand on the map

ACtually because i put the stars in first, and then i found names :oops:

but i LOVE freeman's answer, im going with that one! :lol:

PLus, if i go with this version, im making it +2 for a continent.

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:53 pm**

I dont know what im doing....

Either this:

or this:

(maybe with more territories)

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:53 pm**

Incandenza wrote: I can appreciate that you're trying to make it look more like the game board you posted, but even that game board is pretty butt-ugly..."

I applaud you for using the phrase "butt-ugly". I haven't heard that since high school and it made me laugh out loud.

However, I am one that thinks the current classic map is "butt-ugly", and possibly the cheeziest, dopiest looking map on here, and that is the sole reason why I don't play it more often.

Though I'm not blown away by this attempt, I would love to see a map similar to the size and gameplay of classic, but with completely different graphics.

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:03 pm**

Kaplowitz wrote:I dont know what im doing....

Either this:

or this:
(maybe with more territories)

why not split this post and try at both?

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:45 pm**

For me these map look like Rewamp of Classic map,do you have permision to do these?

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:52 pm**

The 'government is dead' map seems a bit gimicky for the sae of being gimicky...

If you upped the number of territories to something near 56, then you'd have a good 8-player size map...

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:28 pm**

Good idea, but the graphics could use some work

Posted: **Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:02 pm**

MrBenn wrote:If you upped the number of territories to something near 56, then you'd have a good 8-player size map...

exactly!! which is why we need new zealand!! also we could use...

cuba
the bahamas
the islands of the caribbean
The easter islands

Conquer Club

Classic 2.0 (v11)--56 Territories--PAGE 12 [Abandoned]