thats ok, i dont really mind, yeah we'll have to find a way of making it capture the essence of the city,greenoaks wrote:sorry t-o-m, i don't like it at all. it does not seem to capture the flavour of that great city.
the colours dont really help!
Moderator: Cartographers
thats ok, i dont really mind, yeah we'll have to find a way of making it capture the essence of the city,greenoaks wrote:sorry t-o-m, i don't like it at all. it does not seem to capture the flavour of that great city.
on to-dobryguy wrote:The bridges look crappy, could u make them look better?
theres a poll, if people want them to either - link to other airports, or have an ability to bombard other airports,bryguy wrote:You dont say how the airports connect to territories, could u clear that up?
yeah, minor problem, easily fixedbryguy wrote:You could probably lower the height by a good 50 pixels, cause those 50 pixels are basically unused space
i blended the bottom 2 pics, and planning on blending the london eye pic with the others,bryguy wrote:maybe blend the images together?
how do you mean, i used a "screen" layer on top of the picture layer and set the transparency high, i can always alter that,bryguy wrote:Maybe try a solid color with things like big ben in the background?
bryguy wrote:The bonus' look a little high for some places, like the yellow continent, maybe change it to a 3?
i will add that to the to-dobryguy wrote:Also, could you remove the territory lines from the thingy showing what continent has how many?
ill show you what i mean latert-o-m wrote:how do you mean, i used a "screen" layer on top of the picture layer and set the transparency high, i can always alter that,bryguy wrote:Maybe try a solid color with things like big ben in the background?
but are you say that i should not fade the pictures?
they're the names of london boroughsgreenoaks wrote:those names don't do anything for me, is that what londoners refer to those areas as ?
what about if instead of doing all of london you did central london, central london map.
put in the parks, major railway stations, specialist centres such as 'the city' or trafalgar square and of course the river thames.
i actually laughed when i got that PM off you coz i was just thinking that youve probably been playing monopoly,greenoaks wrote:(and many others from monopoly)
i suppose its 'coz me and kemmler live in englnad - kemmler in london, me not in london, visit a lot, but i dont think that that crossed our mind..because we wouldnt really think of that, we've heard of those places, but thats because we live in england (what i said before)greenoaks wrote:ask people anywhere in the world to name places in london and they won't name the places on that map. they will however say things like westminster, waterloo, hyde park, kings cross station (and many others from monopoly) & the city (financial types might name that first). it is the inner city, the traditional city, that we think of.
lol its on dont you worry!cena-rules wrote:Being from Hillingdon I would feel insulted if a london map didnt have hillingon on it. Like it though
so are you saying that my map is simple?what,me worry? wrote:For the love of God can we please have a map that comes out without a complicated sub system, or a loopy railway, or any crazy "ability" maps. What happened to coming out with maps where you you dont have to squinch your eyes to read all the instructions or dont want to play in the first place because of its complexity. Theres something to be said about simplicity like the original maps on CC we have all come to love
bottom right!Unit_2 wrote:Don't forget Big Ben!!
I guess you're referring to the airports & the bombardments? I kind of agree with you, and don't think on a map this small we need those gimmicks. I think if this map gets the graphic touches it needs, it could be one of the greats on the site. I think most players prefer straightforward gameplay.what,me worry? wrote:For the love of God can we please have a map that comes out without a complicated sub system...

t-o-m wrote:bottom right!Unit_2 wrote:Don't forget Big Ben!!

exactly my feeling.what,me worry? wrote:For the love of God can we please have a map that comes out without a complicated sub system, or a loopy railway, or any crazy "ability" maps. What happened to coming out with maps where you you dont have to squinch your eyes to read all the instructions or dont want to play in the first place because of its complexity. Theres something to be said about simplicity like the original maps on CC we have all come to love
well i like the map. Its easy to distinguish between continents and is fairly simple gameplay-wise. The only reason I wouldnt play it is if we (hillingdon) werent on itt-o-m wrote:lol its on dont you worry!cena-rules wrote:Being from Hillingdon I would feel insulted if a london map didnt have hillingdon on it. Like it though
although it might not be if greenoaks gets his wayyylol
although i think greenoaks may be right
lol
greenoaks thinks that it would be better having a map of central london, with tourist attractions that people knowcena-rules wrote:well i like the map. Its easy to distinguish between continents and is fairly simple gameplay-wise. The only reason I wouldnt play it is if we (hillingdon) werent on itt-o-m wrote:lol its on dont you worry!cena-rules wrote:Being from Hillingdon I would feel insulted if a london map didnt have hillingdon on it. Like it though
although it might not be if greenoaks gets his wayyylol
although i think greenoaks may be right
lol
howd you mean, if it will please people we'll do it!Kemmler wrote:we're not changing the map. The only thing we could do is make this the greater london map and have london city map too