Moderator: Community Team
RiskTycoon wrote:so Roger, in other words are you saying it's a choice between a human poop sandwich and a horse poop one? i mean neither sound good but I'd rather eat horse poop than human poop if i had to lol ... i mean, it's not a choice between like Washington and Lincoln !![]()
oh and there is no way he can be elected ... some people think the reverend thing didn't hurt him much ... but look at the polls ... when people look at these they don't look deep enough .. for example ...
national polls - and the attendant wishful-thinking among all the Barack fans in the media - that show "0-Bama bouncing back" and has thus "overcome any damage done to him by Rev Jeremiah Wright"?
NOTHING.
These polls are a measure of how Barack Hussein Obama is thought of by DEMOCRAT VOTERS ONLY - they are the ones who will first forgive and forget the Rev Wright-Obama love affair.
There remains No Evidence (nor any common sense) suggesting INDEPENDENT and REPUBLICAN voters - most espceically White, Blue Collar voters in key swing states - have forgiven nor forgotten the hateful Wright and Obama's long, close embrace of Wright's twisted dogma.
From here, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA REMAINS UNELECTABLE IN A GENERAL ELECTION.

heavycola wrote:WHy do you insist on using his middle name each time? Do you refer to his opponent as John Sidney McCain III?
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
3 factual mistakes in 3 lines.....pretty good effortzodiak wrote:and what is England now?just another UN member,living under the new euro sociolist system.
Hey, let's be like England and turn in our guns and eat crappy food..yum yum
Laughable. Your conclusion (that England is a second rate, even third rate global power) is correct.zodiak wrote:and what is England now?just another UN member,living under the new euro sociolist system.
Hey, let's be like England and turn in our guns and eat crappy food..yum yum
What was the question?jay_a2j wrote:heavycola wrote:WHy do you insist on using his middle name each time? Do you refer to his opponent as John Sidney McCain III?
Good point.
In other news:
YES WE CAN!
jay_a2j wrote:heavycola wrote:WHy do you insist on using his middle name each time? Do you refer to his opponent as John Sidney McCain III?
Good point.
In other news:
YES WE CAN!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
OK, yeah. Hello, I'm an independent. I found it quite funny (and depressing) to watch everyone splutter and gasp over something that some guys fucking pastor said. I suppose that as an athiest I can't really draw the connection, but let me ask you: Do you agree with everything your pastor says? If you answer yes I have next to no respect for you. That was the church that Obama grew up with, and his pastor was likely his father figure throughout a good deal of his life. The fact that he stuck with him for so long despite the potential risks of doing so says mountains more than if he had thrown him on the wayside as soon as things got tough. Hell, I wouldn't vote for someone whose personal ties have that little substance, it indicates to me that they care about nothing but power. The same goes for that racist preacher that endorsed McCain. Who cares? Jesus, let me break this down. If you're looking at a candidate, you should look at one of two things. First off, examine their policies. Second, examine their personal character. What you don't do is look at people vaguely connected to them, dig out their personal history, and smear their name. That sort of politics is disgusting and should be reserved for the sort of people that give half a shit about what Britney Spears is doing. I have some qualms about Obama's policies, but I have so far seen no reason to distrust his character. Also, if you honestly think that Obama is unelectable, you're giving WAY too much credit to the American people. The average independent associates the Republicans with George W. Bush, and the only reason he wasn't tossed out last term was that Kerry was a complete oaf. I don't see how Obama could lose without a huge change in the current situation.RiskTycoon wrote:so Roger, in other words are you saying it's a choice between a human poop sandwich and a horse poop one? i mean neither sound good but I'd rather eat horse poop than human poop if i had to lol ... i mean, it's not a choice between like Washington and Lincoln !![]()
oh and there is no way he can be elected ... some people think the reverend thing didn't hurt him much ... but look at the polls ... when people look at these they don't look deep enough .. for example ...
national polls - and the attendant wishful-thinking among all the Barack fans in the media - that show "0-Bama bouncing back" and has thus "overcome any damage done to him by Rev Jeremiah Wright"?
NOTHING.
These polls are a measure of how Barack Hussein Obama is thought of by DEMOCRAT VOTERS ONLY - they are the ones who will first forgive and forget the Rev Wright-Obama love affair.
There remains No Evidence (nor any common sense) suggesting INDEPENDENT and REPUBLICAN voters - most espceically White, Blue Collar voters in key swing states - have forgiven nor forgotten the hateful Wright and Obama's long, close embrace of Wright's twisted dogma.
From here, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA REMAINS UNELECTABLE IN A GENERAL ELECTION.
These are good reasons not to vote for him. Spouses are good reflections of their counterparts and usually share the same political stance or separate pretty quickly over it. I think it is ridiculous not to take into account his religious influence. If his religious influence didn't have to do with racism and putting down other groups and basically hating America then that would be different. Check out this video.heavycola wrote: He's the antichrist, what did you expect?
Yay for Obama. And yay for the US - this is a massive landmark. A black presidential frontrunner. Fantastic. Way to go!
'Ooooh his wife isn't proud enough to be american, his pastor [who Obama has cut ties with] said some bad things' - are these really reasons to vote GOP? Really?
I wonder if, come polling day, the US will demonstrate it has healed itself enough to vote in a black president. Hope so.
BTW RD - please see the 'universal healthcare' thread. It will explain to you just how disastrously wrong you are on this issue.
Juan_Bottom wrote:<a href="http://s287.photobucket.com/albums/ll147/msiisdashizz/?action=view¤t=guitaricons.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i287.photobucket.com/albums/ll147/msiisdashizz/guitaricons.jpg" border="0" alt="Rock Icons"></a>
Is there any truth to this? Anyone hear about this before? It seems made-up, but I can't be for sure.
I don't want a president who's retardedly patriotic, they usually make poor decisions that piss everyone in the entire world off.kentington wrote:These are good reasons not to vote for him. Spouses are good reflections of their counterparts and usually share the same political stance or separate pretty quickly over it. I think it is ridiculous not to take into account his religious influence. If his religious influence didn't have to do with racism and putting down other groups and basically hating America then that would be different. Check out this video.heavycola wrote: He's the antichrist, what did you expect?
Yay for Obama. And yay for the US - this is a massive landmark. A black presidential frontrunner. Fantastic. Way to go!
'Ooooh his wife isn't proud enough to be american, his pastor [who Obama has cut ties with] said some bad things' - are these really reasons to vote GOP? Really?
I wonder if, come polling day, the US will demonstrate it has healed itself enough to vote in a black president. Hope so.
BTW RD - please see the 'universal healthcare' thread. It will explain to you just how disastrously wrong you are on this issue.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EdAKM5bPX2M&watch_response
Oh, no doubt, Wright is wrong on many (most, perhaps) of his points. Perhaps he is racist. However his suspicion of the government, rather than his blind loyalty, makes him much more American than most. I find it very interesting to hear people call others anti-American for taking stances that the founding fathers would likely have approved of...but what can I do, it's a cultural thing.Juan_Bottom wrote:I must say that I do believe that Wright does have a point. The media is painting him as a racist monster, but I don't believe that's what he is. It seems to me the media just wants a good anti-Obama story. I hate how everything he says is taken out of context. Wright was saying that the government is racist. And I don't think he is wrong. And I can't fault him for believing that the government sent out viles of medicine for HEP. B, contaminated with AIDS, to black and gay men. I don't agree with him, but I see how he came to that conclusion.
Is there anyone else brave enough to post here that hasn't only listened to clips of his speeches?
These are just some of the reasons I'm thinking about voting for McCain. I know most people will think it's just sour grapes because Richardson didn't get in but the Reverand Wright thing was just too much for me to stomach. He sat under that guy's preaching for how many years? I just can't see voting for someone who has been constantly listening to sermons about how to hate America.Roger Dodger wrote:As a veteran myself, I respect Mcain. POW for all those years and still has lots of fight in him.
Obama really doesn't even have a chance at this job. he wants to negotiate with terrorists.
that is totally ridiculous. his wife is a wack job too. born & raised in this country and NOW she's proud of being an american
That is just fracking amazing to me.
luns101 wrote:You should be able to convert a soul from 500 yards away armed only with a Gideon New Testament that you found at a Holiday Inn!!!!
muy_thaiguy wrote:Sir! Permission to do 50 push-ups with the Ark of the Covenant on my back?
kentington wrote:Frigidus: The father analogy doesn't really work in this situation. You can not choose your father, you can not choose to leave until a certain age. However, you can choose your church. If I chose to go to a church where the Rev. made displays and rants such as these or even alluded to racism I would expect people to believe I had these same values. You are correct you don't believe everything your pastor says, but if my pastor said something against my principles, values, or moral code I would call him on it and leave. I would not continue to go to the church for 20 years. If you believe his character has nothing to do with his church then why would he lie about it? Tell the whole truth or worse will be believed because the case is usually worse.
Norse wrote: But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
While this is certainly possible, This Reverend Wright thing is hurting him. Just look at all the people posting here.suggs wrote:Obama hung around because he is a very fine politician.
There! That was an easy one!