SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

hwhrhett · Post by **hwhrhett** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:07 pm

Timminz wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
richardgarr wrote: "That if the people you have power over all like you, that you are doing your job wrong."
That is one messed up quote.
Seriously. Who said that, originally?

nixon?

jbrettlip · Post by **jbrettlip** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:10 pm

Hitler is my guess. Or Idi Amin?

Timminz · Post by **Timminz** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:22 pm

jbrettlip wrote:Hitler is my guess.

I was going to guess that, but didn't want to automatically lose.

reference

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:47 pm

i think wicked done a great job but once the admins make a descoin, do they ever back down??

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:58 am

this thread needs a pole!

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:14 am

wicked wrote:this thread needs a pole!

Pole? The real way to settle it is a KYjelly wrestling match in a paddling pool.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:14 am

happy2seeyou wrote:Where's the poll

i think you mean pole

Edit: hmm already did that one huh... damn people with naughty minds!

Ditocoaf · Post by **Ditocoaf** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:58 am

truly_tasha wrote:I am ashamed to have given my money to a company that would treat their employees so badly and unfairly.

QFT

nesterdude wrote:That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

To all of you talking about the "one-sidedness" of the issue... Twill wrote a post just about as long as Wicked did. He had every chance to explain how the decision was actually reasonable. Instead he said a lot of Formal Friendly Nothing. He BSed his way through several paragraphs in a way that makes it quite obvious that even if there is an "other side," it will not be very compelling. In any case, if Twill refuses to even attempt to show the other side of the story, then we have to base our view of the situation on what we know.

jpliberty · Post by **jpliberty** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:24 am

qeee1 wrote:jpliberty, don't try and restore sense to the argument, that's not fun.

I know. I'm sorry. Ban me.

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:03 am

Ditocoaf is right in that Twill has posted nothing to explain his side of the issue, however, I would like to get a more nuanced view of what took place before anyone gets sacked.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:15 am

MeDeFe wrote:Ditocoaf is right in that Twill has posted nothing to explain his side of the issue, however, I would like to get a more nuanced view of what took place before anyone gets sacked.

We're being an angry mob...we don't care about the point of view.

Ditocoaf · Post by **Ditocoaf** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:17 am

The Weird One wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:Ditocoaf is right in that Twill has posted nothing to explain his side of the issue, however, I would like to get a more nuanced view of what took place before anyone gets sacked.
We're being an angry mob...we don't care about the point of view.

I'd actually like to hear it. However, the fact that we're pointedly not hearing their side, is telling enough, to me.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:22 am

azezzo wrote:keep wicked.
shes one of the few mods with a set of balls.

And I thought Wicked was a lady?!

C.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:22 am

yeti_c wrote:
azezzo wrote:keep wicked.
shes one of the few mods with a set of balls.
And I thought Wicked was a lady?!

C.

Who says they're her balls.

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:38 am

nesterdude wrote:
suggs wrote:Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?
That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

I've more education in my little finger than the rest of this site put together, so your argument is dismissed with disdain.

sam_levi_11 · Post by **sam_levi_11** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:40 am

suggs wrote:
nesterdude wrote:
suggs wrote:Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?
That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.
I've more education in my little finger than the rest of this site put together, so your argument is dismissed with disdain.

yer he's forgetting that your suggs, suggs is never wrong, even when pretending to flirt with sum1 who isnt even 18 till august 12th!

bow to suggs, he is the king.

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:42 am

The motion is passed.

ps i think Twill should resign, let him keep some dignity.

Androidz · Post by **Androidz** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:43 am

i volenteer to take over his works:D seriously,:D

RashidJelzin · Post by **RashidJelzin** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:13 am

pimphawks70 wrote:I couldn't agree more

Twill is gay while wicked rocks

Yo, yo!

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:39 am

sam_levi_11 wrote:suggs is never wrong, even when pretending to flirt with sum1 who isnt even 18 till august 12th!

There's nothing wrong with that.

Just so long as the person isn't flirting with sum1 who isnt even 15 till august 12th, then all is well.

Remember kids: Ladies are like stock options, you buy them when they're young and cheap, then hold onto them until their assets mature... after that you either liquidate them and sell of their valuable holdings, or you put on a suit and take them to a big hall on Wall Street and sell them to rich old dudes who smoke big cigars and look like the guy on the Monopoly box.

Now, what were we talking about again?

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:57 am

Poles and wicked sex

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:59 am

girls.

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:59 am

sack twill.

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:23 am

No, no I don't think Lack should fire Twill.

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:25 am

Minister Masket wrote:No, no I don't think Lack should fire Twill.

Good. Its nice to have a debate. Still, at the moment I havent heard a single decent reason why he should remain de facto in charge.

SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?