Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:06 pm
by happysadfun
But I'll be a big dog who eats communists. And you can't do anything about it.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:08 pm
by P Gizzle
cowshrptrn wrote:a good way to make this original would be to have the native people featured for territories. The amazon river, could make some great boundaries.
yeah, that's what i was thinking about territories. continents could be the people who conquered them and boundaries that are impassible could be Andes and Amazon.
and happysadfun, take a bite out of communism, for me, will ya?
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:09 pm
by happysadfun
FINE! So I will disappear from this thread. And Kim Jong-Il is too salty. Needs a bit of pepper. He's also undercooked. We humans should treat our dogs better.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:10 pm
by P Gizzle
happysadfun wrote:FINE! So I will disappear from this thread. And Kim Jong-Il is too salty. Needs a bit of pepper. He's also undercooked. We humans should treat our dogs better.
get the Chinese guy too please. and you know, i thnk KJI is too crazy to eat
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:12 pm
by happysadfun
Darn... my cover is blown. I'm still here in Wisconsin. Not in NK.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:13 pm
by P Gizzle
love the sig happysadfun. also, how is the F and I map lookin? or r we gonna ditch it?
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:13 pm
by Knight of Orient
we need to figure out what countries we are gonna have and their boundaries
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:21 pm
by P Gizzle
Knight of Orient wrote:we need to figure out what countries we are gonna have and their boundaries
here's what i was thinking..... ok, first what we do is set up the Continents. they would be Spanish America, English America, Portugese America and french America. then the Countries would be indian tribes and their territory. and with the Mayans and Aztecs, we'd add their capitals too. Like tenochtitlan
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:51 am
by happysadfun
We Have Detected A Big Error: French America is basically French Guiana and Haiti. How would they connect? You're better off not including non-Spanish territory. Because then it wouldn't be Spanish Conquest. See what I'm getting at?
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:04 pm
by P Gizzle
happysadfun wrote:We Have Detected A Big Error: French America is basically French Guiana and Haiti. How would they connect? You're better off not including non-Spanish territory. Because then it wouldn't be Spanish Conquest. See what I'm getting at?
good point. me and knight will discuss this
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 8:35 am
by Knight of Orient
indeed
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:13 am
by P Gizzle
so..., what do u think. it will be easier to just keep in the other countries territories, but happysadfun thinks we should make it just spanish.
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:35 am
by Knight of Orient
carribean new world, mexican conquest, the gulf conquest....what do you think about these?
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:11 pm
by happysadfun
If you grey out haiti and f guiana, it could be iberian conquest....
P Gizzle wrote:happysadfun wrote:No! They shall be greyed out.
No. it will give me more to work with!
P Gizzle wrote:happysadfun wrote:I hope you know that Brazil and Greater Suriname are not going to be included in this map
yep. it's SPANISH and not Portugese conquest.
You're talking in circles.
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:53 pm
by P Gizzle
happysadfun wrote:If you grey out haiti and f guiana, it could be iberian conquest....
P Gizzle wrote:happysadfun wrote:No! They shall be greyed out.
No. it will give me more to work with!
P Gizzle wrote:happysadfun wrote:I hope you know that Brazil and Greater Suriname are not going to be included in this map
yep. it's SPANISH and not Portugese conquest.
You're talking in circles.
well, im sorry, i guess now that i look at it, i changed my mind. i think American Conquest would be good. and depending, we could include N.A. but just for that we would lose support.
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 8:59 pm
by Knight of Orient
conquest of mexico. simple, something unique here, and not contradictory....i think
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:24 pm
by P Gizzle
well it includes places other than mexico. how bout European Conquest of the Americas?
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:09 am
by Knight of Orient
what about maps others are makin?
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:21 am
by P Gizzle
what do u mean?
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:16 am
by Knight of Orient
so u think we should do one that has c. amer., s. amer., and n.amer.?
the original idea, i guess
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:15 pm
by happysadfun
A colonial idea at that. I voice, "YEH and NOT NAY!"
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:50 pm
by P Gizzle
well, it doesnt matter what we do. what do u think? it would be easier to do all of the americas, and their indian tribes.
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:07 pm
by Knight of Orient
Looking around, ive seen no map of mexico. the best s. america has is a brazil map. i am hesitant at doing a joint s. america map, but one of central america im in complete favor of. i will leave this up to you p gizzle.
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:24 pm
by P Gizzle
ok, i say we do a C. America and S. America, because a) i hate the brazil map., b) it will give us a lot of territory to work with, c) nobody will complain about including N. America d) we shall name it Colonizing Latin America, or something along those lines
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:34 pm
by Knight of Orient
Or just Latin America for that matter