Conquer Club

hecter wrote:

Martin Ronne wrote:

InkL0sed wrote:Temporary nationalization may be necessary, but it isn't socialism if it's temporary.

What could possibly go wrong?!?!?!

The market could collapse creating a ripple effecting negatively affecting the worlds economy? Oh, wait...

that sounds like globalization to me.....

Snorri1234 wrote:

demonfork wrote:

InkL0sed wrote:

demonfork wrote:

InkL0sed wrote:You don't even know the crazies out there.

This dude who ran against Obama for Illinois State Senate claims his actions reveal that he's clearly a Communist and needs to be stopped before the country falls apart. No, don't laugh, it isn't funny in the slightest!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6p3l8BX ... re=related

Everything that Keyes said in this video is 100% true.

See the first post on this page.

You'll think face palm when your locked up in a FEMA concentration camp.

THE US GOVURNMUNT IS OUT TO GET US! QUICK! STACK UP ON CANNED BEANS AND AMMO! WE MUST DEFEAT THIS MENACE!

It's too late!!! Why didn't we just vote for Ron Paul, then none of this would've happened?!!!

It is not so bad. Obama has had the pods sent out with the recovery package. State officials will place them at key locations in your neighborhoods. Just go to sleep and in the morning you will find everything is wonderful.

tin hats for everyone please.

Don't accept gummint-ishoo tin hats - the control chips are on the inside.

InkL0sed wrote:Temporary nationalization may be necessary, but it isn't socialism if it's temporary.

A temporary government program is an oxymoron.

Please explain this phenomenon, kind sir.

Rationing?

mpjh wrote:It is not so bad. Obama has had the pods sent out with the recovery package. State officials will place them at key locations in your neighborhoods. Just go to sleep and in the morning you will find everything is wonderful.

Night Strike wrote:A temporary government program is an oxymoron.

In this instance, I agree. It's painfully obvious that all of this happened because the people in charge wanted it to happen... So why would we fix their mess by giving them even more control and power? I believe this is exactly what Thomas Jefferson warned Americans about when he said "a central bank printing money is more dangerous to American freedoms than a standing army."
That's an approximate qoute but you get the idea.
And who is so stupid to say "the best way to save our freedom is through socialism!" I mean, C'mon.

jonesthecurl wrote:Rationing?

If you're saying that rationing is a temporary program that our government has stopped, then I agree IN PART. Because the laws that the government put in place during the 2nd world war and the Great Depression are still in place. The governmnet still has the authority to confiscate, gold, silver, food, and other items from private citizens, they just don't do it. Besides, this is something that would stiffle the economy, and the rich wouldn't want that exactly.

It's more accurate to say "don't give the government more power, because they will never give it back."

Don't understand where all the fear comes from, Britain has had socialist elements to it's style of government since just after the 2nd world war and our standard of living is equal to the US's, roughly.
I think you're getting socialists and bogey men mixed up.
Bear in mind that not all types of socialism are intrusive or even Marxist (the national health service is the result of one of these, and a very nice result too) and also the fact that the reason we are in a global recession (depression, possibly) is down to the free market and capitalism.

sssh walnut
Don´t tell the people of the colonies the big secret (ǝɹɐɔ ɥʇlɐǝɥ lɐsɹǝʌıun)
better dead than red!

..and what is this bullshit I hear about letting poor people go to public school in the US?
Payed by the hardworking middle and upper class.. fucking commies are what you are!

snufkin wrote:sssh walnut
Don´t tell the people of the colonies the big secret (ǝɹɐɔ ɥʇlɐǝɥ lɐsɹǝʌıun)
better dead than red!

..and what is this bullshit I hear about letting poor people go to public school in the US?
Payed by the hardworking middle and upper class.. fucking commies are what you are!

I believe that the public is in favor of both universal health care and education. It's the politicains that are against it.

It's the reorganization of the banking system that we are throwing a fit about. The public keeps saying NO NO NO!!! and the politicans keep saying YES YES YES!!!

I think 50% of my taxes should go to education. There would be less idiots then, which is a good thing. Plus they would make more money since they aren't stupid, which in turns makes more tax revenue.

Hate to disappoint you, but uneducated and stupid are not the same thing. In addition, educated and smart are similarly not the same thing.

Certainly, if he had more of either he would have known that.