Moderator: Community Team
you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.
Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.
You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
Suspect101 wrote:you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.
People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
unvote vote Hologram
so you don't think this a reach at all and that his deduction is justified from my random vote?pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
unvote vote Hologram
Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?Hologram wrote:Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
Do you see me changing my vote?Suspect101 wrote:Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?Hologram wrote:Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
I hope you don't.Hologram wrote:Do you see me changing my vote?Suspect101 wrote:Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?Hologram wrote:Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
I saw that as well. With absolutely nothing to go on, he defended me on a completely bullshit argument. Either I'm way too persuasive, or he's way to scummy.Suspect101 wrote:I hope you don't.Hologram wrote:Do you see me changing my vote?Suspect101 wrote:Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?Hologram wrote:Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.
Suspect101 wrote:so you don't think this a reach at all and that his deduction is justified from my random vote?pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
unvote vote Hologram
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?Hologram wrote:I saw that as well. With absolutely nothing to go on, he defended me on a completely bullshit argument. Either I'm way too persuasive, or he's way to scummy.Suspect wrote: I hope you don't.
Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.
Unvote
Your move pmc.
Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?
Fair enough although if you read this:Suspect101 wrote:Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?
I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
Woo! See what I started? A giant gagglefuck where we have two suspicious people, myself and pmc. Now I know why I did what I did, but pmc seems to be a little too butt hurt and over-reactive to me suddenly putting suspicion on him.pmchugh wrote:Fair enough although if you read this:Suspect101 wrote:Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.
Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.
Hah, im voting you for backing down to easily, eery point should be scrutinised but this isn't a three player game. What does everyone else think?Hologram wrote:Woo! See what I started? A giant gagglefuck where we have two suspicious people, myself and pmc. Now I know why I did what I did, but pmc seems to be a little too butt hurt and over-reactive to me suddenly putting suspicion on him.pmchugh wrote:Fair enough although if you read this:Suspect101 wrote:Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.
Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.
My lack of vote still stands. Both of you seem to be way to butt hurt over all of this though, that's for sure.
Hologram looks the scummiest.pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?
Alright. Holo was reaching to accuse Suspect, but his points were in fact valid. Suspect looked like scum/lyncher to me more than Holo, especially since he was so sensitive about being called the lyncher over a random vote.Stroop wrote:Hologram looks the scummiest.pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?
Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.
Ok he was suspicious but that was a very premature hammer, why didn't you let him claim or at least put up a defense. Very poor decision IMO.Stroop wrote:Alright. Holo was reaching to accuse Suspect, but his points were in fact valid. Suspect looked like scum/lyncher to me more than Holo, especially since he was so sensitive about being called the lyncher over a random vote.Stroop wrote:Hologram looks the scummiest.pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?
Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.
Hologram backed off as soon as someone mentioned pmc and he might be partners in crime and turns the spotlight on pmc (who doesn't even look bad at all (am I scum with pmc now?)). My money is on Holo, but #2 is surely Suspect.
vote Hologram