Conquer Club

Bones2484 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote: I am not, but that is for another story...

lol. You can complain about that one game you saw bad dice, and I'll whine about Game 4720101!

you're totally right about that bones2484! your team's dice were sick!
you forced us to eliminate eachother to survive, that's how much we got weakened !

chipv wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:Woah can you say G1!? Youth over experience.....

Or dice have been sick for them... such as taking 10 singles and losing 0 for a kill.... meh dice happen right?

These guys have played excellent. G1 need 2 more wins for an outright victory, 1 to ensure at least a draw... gonna be tight.

Why do they need both to win ( Ladder?)-- need just 1 for the victory- no?

Scott-Land wrote:

chipv wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:Woah can you say G1!? Youth over experience.....

Or dice have been sick for them... such as taking 10 singles and losing 0 for a kill.... meh dice happen right?

These guys have played excellent. G1 need 2 more wins for an outright victory, 1 to ensure at least a draw... gonna be tight.

Why do they need both to win ( Ladder?)-- need just 1 for the victory- no?

30 games they have 14 won...

Scott-Land wrote:Why do they need both to win ( Ladder?)-- need just 1 for the victory- no?

There was a 30th game that hadn't been made yet when you looked.

I see now..... sorry.

Down to the wire-- gl to both sides.

G1 wins this game Game 4921267

gonna be down to the wire. Looks like we might need a tie break...

Bruceswar wrote:gonna be down to the wire. Looks like we might need a tie break...

Psh-- it's over.... US Senate is a lock for G1.

Scott-Land wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:gonna be down to the wire. Looks like we might need a tie break...

Psh-- it's over.... US Senate is a lock for G1.

69 men us 35 men them in US Senate, unless I am mistaken, that is almost 2 to 1 men... Unless I am mistaken looks good for us?

gonna be a tie... tie break of some sort to come.

Good challenge, well done both sides!

amazzony wrote:Good challenge, well done both sides!

Not over just yet. We are going to have a tie break, but I agree well done on both sides.

This is Just too Good.......OVERTIME......SUDDEN DEATH......Maybe we will even get to see a first . 2 clan's deciding use A Random Map Overtime ?

Indeed you very well may. Looks like G1 wants 7 games, 3 each side, and 1 on a random map. If that is what they want lets do it.

Bruceswar wrote:

Agreed upon settings:
No Speed
No Freestyle
No Beta Maps
Limit Conquest Maps
Limit the Flat Rate
CLA Map rules Apply. 1 map per clan per setting. AKA 1 map can only be used for 1 doubles, 1 triples, and 1 quads.

16 doubles
8 triples
6 quads

Games to Start after Easter Holiday.

Generation 1:The Clan Home Games

Doubles
Game 4682397 G1 Win
Game 4681119 Knights Win
Game 4673051 Knights Win
Game 4670152 G1 Win
Game 4681358 Knights Win
Game 4681385 Knights Win
Game 4681353 G1 Win
Game 4819576 G1 Win


Triples
Game 4692899 Knights Win
Game 4681367 Knights Win
Game 4692912 G1 Win
Game 4921267 G1 Win


Quads
Game 4681378 Knights Win
Game 4692930 Knights Win
Game 4904740 Knights Win

Knights of the Round Table Home Games


Doubles
Game 4690762 G1 Win
Game 4693142 G1 Win
Game 4722033 G1 Win
Game 4771624 Knights Win
Game 4836287 Knights Win
Game 4843860 G1 Win
Game 4852633 G1 Win
Game 4852593 Knights Win


Triples
Game 4722101 G1 Win
Game 4727656 G1 Win
Game 4745512 Knights Win
Game 4982383 Knights Win

Quads
Game 4720101 Knights Win
Game 4727615 G1 Win
Game 4727689 G1 Win

can i join your clan

Bruceswar wrote:Indeed you very well may. Looks like G1 wants 7 games, 3 each side, and 1 on a random map. If that is what they want lets do it.

I may be mistaken, but I thought the consensus around the robot forum was that a tie is a tie, and that we would totally be up for another challenge at some point in the future. If we hadn't been prepared to accept a tie result, we would have ensured the challenge was not an even number of games.

It was a great challenge, and I'm sure the next one will be too.

Timminz wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:Indeed you very well may. Looks like G1 wants 7 games, 3 each side, and 1 on a random map. If that is what they want lets do it.

I may be mistaken, but I thought the consensus around the robot forum was that a tie is a tie, and that we would totally be up for another challenge at some point in the future. If we hadn't been prepared to accept a tie result, we would have ensured the challenge was not an even number of games.

It was a great challenge, and I'm sure the next one will be too.

How bout make the new challenge a Tiebreaker challenge, starting....today?

Timminz wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:Indeed you very well may. Looks like G1 wants 7 games, 3 each side, and 1 on a random map. If that is what they want lets do it.

I may be mistaken, but I thought the consensus around the robot forum was that a tie is a tie, and that we would totally be up for another challenge at some point in the future. If we hadn't been prepared to accept a tie result, we would have ensured the challenge was not an even number of games.

It was a great challenge, and I'm sure the next one will be too.

According to Baldaonis we were going to work out a tie break series of some sort.

Is this FINAL?

not yet... not at all

Just seems odd that it takes almost a month to decide on whether there will be a tie-breaker and what it will look like.

Well I was out of town all last week or else this would be under way by now.

And is the tie-breaker under way?

Please, decide what you wants! A tie-breaker or not!? That aint to much to ask, is it?

Grtz
MarVal

There is no tie-breaker happening. We knew going into a 30 game series, that a tie was possible.

Bruceswar wrote:According to Baldaonis we were going to work out a tie break series of some sort.

As I recall, he posed the question to the clan, and the consensus was that we were not interested in a tie-breaker being played immediately, but that we would be more than happy to do battle again at a future date with another full challenge.

Also, BaldAdonis disappeared entirely, about 4 weeks ago, so any negotiations made through him are somewhat lost now.

Bottom line, this challenge resulted in a tie.

Timminz wrote:There is no tie-breaker happening. We knew going into a 30 game series, that a tie was possible.

Bruceswar wrote:According to Baldaonis we were going to work out a tie break series of some sort.

As I recall, he posed the question to the clan, and the consensus was that we were not interested in a tie-breaker being played immediately, but that we would be more than happy to do battle again at a future date with another full challenge.

Also, BaldAdonis disappeared entirely, about 4 weeks ago, so any negotiations made through him are somewhat lost now.

Bottom line, this challenge resulted in a tie.

These were my thoughts, exactly. jpcloet's rankings allow for such a scenario to take place and is expected to happen sometimes!

This was an amazing fought battle and both sides should be proud. Hopefully next time we meet there will be a tiebreaker set before the match