Nobunaga wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Nobunaga wrote:... Also like the US but to a much greater extent the people are kept ignorant. Here it is done with third-rate public schools, reality TV and fantasy football. There it is done with internet filters, scary-as-hell cops everywhere, the People's News and meaningless obsession with western fads.
The difference is TV and fantasy football are choices. Perhaps stupid ones, but choices. In China, the government controls what you see.
If we have controls, it is in far more subtle forms... lack of funding for libraries ..oops I see you did mention poor schools. Also, putting journalism to the free market system.
... I cannot counter your "These are choices" argument because of course they are. But is it so difficult to believe that those in positions protected by the ignorance of the public might very well believe that it will be only a minority that seeks to know and understand? And might they be right? Like so many animals, following, moving with the herd/flock/pack along the easiest course.
I heard an interview the other day, sadly not available for free, with Robert McChesney. He poses an interesting counter to this. He suggests that the only way for us to have a truly free press is to take it OUT of the free market and instead to fund at least 3 divergeant points of view equally. He suggested that this is actually what the founding fathers did initially.
I cannot reiterate the entire discussion, but it did make sens.
Nobunaga wrote:
... What does government have to gain from a truly educated and informed public? Compare that to what it stands to lose.
That depends on who the government really is. If the government is a few powerful people, then having an educated mass is a threat, except that you have to allow for some technical education if you wish to gain technologically.
However, our government is and always has been of the people. Having a decent and freely available education AND access to information outside of the education system are key to that happening. Right now, our media is controlled by corporations who's ultimate goal is profit (other than, to some extent, PBS and such.. however they are not entirely immune).
Nobunaga wrote:
... We both know Americans are ignorant as hell, embarassingly so. I believe that is the plan.
True.
and there is a reason why "no child left behind" has been dubbed "every child left behind".
Nobunaga wrote:
... But back on the China theme... While in China I could not access many of the websites I normally visited while in the US, Japan, Taiwan. Most US news sites were unavailable - I missed Drudge. Your beloved NPR was not available, and that struck me as odd. Streaming radio was impossible.
... In Guangdong (and most certainly many other cities) there are large buildings dedicated soley to the monitoring of internet viewership and the blocking of potentially dangerous sites. In China there is a ridiculously cute cartoon character (as so many east Asians love) in a police uniform who pops up on the screen to ask you if you are certain you want to be searching for whatever it is you might have just run through Google. It's spooky.
...
I am not sure why NPR missing would be odd. I believe that would be among the first to be censored.
Taht said, what worries me are the huge numbers of people here who get their news solely from CBN or who consider Fox to be an unbiased source. Then you have what might not be true censorship, but which winds up with the same result .. people who won't spend more than 1-2 minutes on any topic, who won't go beyond the internet to find information, etc. And still think they are "well informed".
The thing is that some subjects are very well covered, so one can think all these are great sources. However, you notice a definite absence of certain kinds of information. I am not sure it is strictly intentional, but the bias is there.