How about another option? (God and all that...)
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
TheProwler
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:54 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
I guess we don't get to argue this time, snorri. I misinterpreted what you mean the first time, but now it looks like we agree. Damn.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
-
Snorri1234
- Posts: 3438
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
- Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
- Contact:
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
Shit! Quickly, let's go to another thread!TheProwler wrote:I guess we don't get to argue this time, snorri. I misinterpreted what you mean the first time, but now it looks like we agree. Damn.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."
Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
-
PLAYER57832
- Posts: 3085
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
Wow, prowler, two times today you have come up with wonderful and thoughtful posts! You have definitely added to this discussion.
That said, I think it is a measure of extremes.
In one sense, as a scientist, I acknowledge that I cannot prove God to another person. On the other hand, I have seen enough evidence that for me, it is essentially as true as the firmest of concrete evidence that I can show someone else in a scientific sense. In the most technical sense, you could say that I am agnotic. Yet, I generally describe myself as Chrsitian, because I truly do believe and try to follow the precepts, teach my children the same.
Some would say that because I acknowledge any level of doubt at all, I am not fully Christian. Would I, for example, let myself be thrown into an oven rather than deny Christianity? If it were my kids being thrown in instead, I would almost certainly say "no" (with the caveat that some lives might be more terrible than death), but that also is because I don't believe my God would actually require that of me. In ancient times they did believe this.
Some suggest that we must all be like that, return to the unquestioning faith of children, or we do not have true faith. I am not sure. It is an interesting question.
That said, I think it is a measure of extremes.
In one sense, as a scientist, I acknowledge that I cannot prove God to another person. On the other hand, I have seen enough evidence that for me, it is essentially as true as the firmest of concrete evidence that I can show someone else in a scientific sense. In the most technical sense, you could say that I am agnotic. Yet, I generally describe myself as Chrsitian, because I truly do believe and try to follow the precepts, teach my children the same.
Some would say that because I acknowledge any level of doubt at all, I am not fully Christian. Would I, for example, let myself be thrown into an oven rather than deny Christianity? If it were my kids being thrown in instead, I would almost certainly say "no" (with the caveat that some lives might be more terrible than death), but that also is because I don't believe my God would actually require that of me. In ancient times they did believe this.
Some suggest that we must all be like that, return to the unquestioning faith of children, or we do not have true faith. I am not sure. It is an interesting question.
-
jonesthecurl
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: disused action figure warehouse
- Contact:
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
As an ex-believer, I would add that Christians are expected to have doubts. They are expected to overcome them with the aid of faith. Which is I think rather the point of faith.
There is no point in someone who has been baptised as a child being "confirmed" if they've never reached the point of saying to themself "maybe it isn't true after all", and then decided that it is.
There is no point in someone who has been baptised as a child being "confirmed" if they've never reached the point of saying to themself "maybe it isn't true after all", and then decided that it is.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
-
thegreekdog
- Posts: 7246
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
And THAT is why I don't engage in arguments about religion. No one knows for sure, so why bother arguing about it.jonesthecurl wrote:As an ex-believer, I would add that Christians are expected to have doubts. They are expected to overcome them with the aid of faith. Which is I think rather the point of faith.
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
Because it's fun. And I'm probably right.thegreekdog wrote:And THAT is why I don't engage in arguments about religion. No one knows for sure, so why bother arguing about it.jonesthecurl wrote:As an ex-believer, I would add that Christians are expected to have doubts. They are expected to overcome them with the aid of faith. Which is I think rather the point of faith.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
Everybody's an agnostic, and those who say they aren't are lying. You get varying degrees of belief one way or the other, but when it comes down to it nobody knows for sure.
My thoughts exactly... almost.Neoteny wrote:Because it's fun. And I'm probably right.thegreekdog wrote:And THAT is why I don't engage in arguments about religion. No one knows for sure, so why bother arguing about it.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
-
pimpdave
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
- Contact:
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
FINALLY, an M.D. on the board.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
-
PLAYER57832
- Posts: 3085
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: How about another option? (God and all that...)
Technically true, but for some that uncertainty is mostly a technicality, they live their lives by the belief. For others, the question itself is a way of life. That makes the difference. Those who cannot take one belief or another are agnostic.john9blue wrote:Everybody's an agnostic, and those who say they aren't are lying. You get varying degrees of belief one way or the other, but when it comes down to it nobody knows for sure.